you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Richard_Parker 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

That is real constructive. Do you not see how that if 38 percent of women are willing to fuck blacks (or any other ethnic group), French posterity will be eviscerated in two or three generations if not sooner?

[–]EthnocratArcheofuturist[S] 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

What about the 49% of men? Why are you leaving them out? Anyway, that kind of extrapolation is useless.

[–]FoxySDTWhite Nationalist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

It's been found in American studies that people who do not state any racial preference behave in very racially-selective manner as those who state their racial preference.

Figure 5.11 shows the estimated ethnicity preferences separately for users who declarethat they only want to meet users of their own race and users who do not have a declaredpreference. Due to sample size issues, we consider only first-contact e-mails from Caucasians.It is evident that both members who declare a preference for their own ethnicity, and thosewho do not, discriminate against users who belong to different ethnic groups. However,discrimination is more pronounced for members of the former group, i.e. these users act in amanner that is consistent with their stated preferences. There is strong evidence, however,that the members of the latter group also have same-race preferences, which contradictstheir statement that ethnicity “doesn’t matter” to them.

https://sci-hub.se/https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=895442

[–]Richard_Parker 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Good news. Even so, the concerted effort to saturate airwaves, advertising so on with interracial relationships is having an effect.