you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]ayotollahsinIran 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

A question for Americans here: Assume your side has taken over the US. White Americans are the absolute majority with positive birth rates and the Left and jews are completely out of power. Would you consider gun control measures?

Most of the rest of the developed world doesn't have to deal with a very real reality of getting killed by some mentally ill depraved beast, you can argue about the rarity all you want but when it happens it happens, you or someone you love is dead, permanently injured or scarred etc. Mentally Ill scum like this guy or Elliot Rodgers or Adam Lanza should not be allowed within even a yard of a firearm, even with laws against them, guns are widespread all over the US they can easily still acquire one.

The second amendment really hasn't even been that useful for White Americans considering the state the country is in now and how little hard power yous have. Obese hillbillies with shotguns and pistols do not stand a chance against the most powerful,technologically advanced army in the world, so as a freedom failsafe the second amendment fails.

If what I described in the opening part occurred, would you consider gun control measures?

[–]aukofthecovenantWhite man with eyes 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Would you consider gun control measures?

Back when I was still a liberal, I came across this story about two (white) men who shot each other dead with their legally-owned concealed handguns over a minor traffic incident. Being the Daily Kos, it naturally ended with "if it weren't for guns they'd still be alive, hurr durr" but it's obvious that the real problem is that the guy who shot first could not control his impulses. I am for impulsive-moron control.

Obese hillbillies with shotguns and pistols do not stand a chance against the most powerful,technologically advanced army in the world

It is a grave error to think that only obese hillbillies are hardcore 2A-ers. This guy, for example. Also, the Viet Cong didn't stand a chance against the most powerful, technologically advanced army in the world either.

[–]ayotollahsinIran 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

The Vietnam war was a different situation compared to a domestic fight. It was thousands of miles a way, heavily backed by the Soviets and Chinese and had overwhelmingly popular support as well as having a home guerrilla advantage in deep jungles, an advantage an American revolt doesn't have. Not to mention the evolution of weaponry, tech and tactics since the 1960s.

[–]aukofthecovenantWhite man with eyes 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It was thousands of miles a way, heavily backed by the Soviets and Chinese and had overwhelmingly popular support as well as having a home guerrilla advantage in deep jungles

You cite these facts to explain the defeat, yet all of them were known or could reasonably be expected upon first entering the war. So according to you, the decision makers should have known that they would lose but they entered the war anyway and lost anyway. They miscalculated once, they may do it again.

Not to mention the evolution of weaponry, tech and tactics since the 1960s.

Be more specific.