you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]cisheteroscumWhite Nationalist[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

So Ryan's main point with this vid of I understand correctly is that there was some marginal voter flip-flopping between Nazi and Communist parties in 1930s Germany - and that this goes to show the two ideologies are not necessarily diametrically opposed. In a broader sense, that the left/right divide is kind of fake and the Nazis being "far right" and the Communists "far left" is oversimplifying the issue. This lends support to his "cult-like" model of politics that he thinks better describes the phenomenon.

I think this is largely unsurprising to us - but still an interesting vid, glad he's back at it again.

[–]JuliusCaesar225Nationalist + Socialist 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

The 2 ideologies and the character of its proponents are diametrically opposed. However just because someone votes for one these parties when they were relevant in Germany would not make them a passionate ideological supporter of the cause. Therefore most of those who would switch were never truly "communists" or "nazis" in the first place, just casual voters switching sides.

[–]Nombre27 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That's my take as well. I know AH mentioned the "No true Scotsman" fallacy but I think it's applicable in this instance as changing your vote is an exact demonstration that you don't agree with that party.