Opinion of the red-green-brown alliance

submitted by Courbeaux from self.debatealtright

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Ally is a strong word. If Jews can create coalitions against whites whites can create coalitions as well.

[–]arainynightinskyrim 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Not with the factions that our guy here proposed.

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Agreed. I've never heard such an alliance mentioned in the dissident space which makes me suspicion courbeaux as some type of bad faith poster. People should not put forth alliances or coalitions without carefully explaining their reasoning.

[–]Minedwe 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I mean, I was under the impression that people in our movement were generally supportive of people like Assad, Hussein, Gaddafi, etc. and I don't see an issue with it. As long as they stay in their lane (that is, the ME) they are great as they have existing beef with and proximity to Israel and without the support of the West, Israel would get creamed. And, as I understand, Ba'athists are nationalists, which I assume would be rather against their countrymen fleeing and running off to Europe to rape and eat off welfare, but who knows.

Although something VERY IMPORTANT should be noted: It would be less of an alliance in any case, more of a mutual "we don't care about you too much, but we have the same general goal, so lets agree to leave each other alone"