you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Salos10000[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

You have to back this up with hard evidence.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

With regards to what? I'm not picking small specific events, but rather macroeconomic shifts. Ghaddafi was a well known pusher of the petrodollar and was a thorn in the side of global hegemony. Iranian banking is separated from the world economy and is it's own can of worms- there is a lot to say/read about that. Vietnam only joined WBG in the 50s and it's economic connections to international finance were only strengthened by the 5-year plan in the aftermath of the fall of Saigan.

In regards to quantitative easing, there was RAMPANT speculation that it would lead to inflation in 2008/2009. Every other economics paper was certain that we would pay the price for flooding the market with unbacked currency to float the economy but this never happened. There was very little consequence to printing ungodly amounts of money and now we are doing it all over again.

You should be able to read between the lines here and easily establish that the conspiracies are at least rooted in truth: global finance has a stranglehold on the comings and goings of the world and the "rulebook" that we think we play by is irrelevant. Fiscal responsibility, scarcity, etc all go out the window when the people pulling the strings want them to.

International finance as a whole is undoubtedly more about control than economics.