Especially when they've undergone a practical 'Talibanization' that leads them to bizarrely believe that they have some sort of 'moral right' to uproot everything about history that they don't like, e.g. to destroy practically every historical statue bar those, unsurprisingly, of Karl Marx and his acolytes. That historical Marxists are noticeably exempt from their attempts to demolish and reshape history is perhaps the most obvious giveaway regarding what these people really want.

What's fascinating is how they have accumulated so much power that their attempts to gain more no longer even require violence. They act with practical impunity, and thus do not even need weapons. Governments won't touch them, because any crackdown on the likes of BLM would obviously be 'racist'. Likewise, they come up with the most absurd excuses for refusing to declare Antifa a terrorist organization. 'They're not organized and have no obvious leaders'. Yeah? A group that has chapters in practically every notable Western city (complete with social media groups and pages, with which they organize their sympathizers) and has obvious chapter leaders? The 'Alt-Right' has no organization (actually, far less than Antifa, given it has no city-wide chapters, and has no equivalent to 'Acab', the anarchist circled 'A', or other Antifa symbols which are ubiquitously found in the form of graffiti, and are evidence of Antifa being practically everywhere) or obvious leader/s either, but notice how the same excuses suddenly don't apply anymore? If a bunch of Cartels or Islamist groups (or even worse, if 'MAGA' or the 'Alt-Right') did a fraction of what those in the CHOP, Antifa, BLM, etc. have done (e.g. mass arson attacks, clashes with police, declaring 'autonomous zones'), it would be considered an 'invasion', as 'terrorism', etc. practically without hesitation.