WHO updates its widely-used gender mainstreaming manual — “(...) gender identity exists on a continuum and that sex is not limited to male or female.”

submitted by FlyingKangaroo from who.int

all 20 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]handbananasrevenge 14 insightful - 2 fun14 insightful - 1 fun15 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

The “I FUCKING LOVE SCIENCE!” crowd can go piss on a live wire. Funny how they never seem to notice that SCIENCE! has been completely converged and always magically seems to support whatever opinions are held by ruling class and people who give them grant money.

[–]LtGreenCo 9 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

I love science when it's used correctly and not abused, which is unfortunately happening with exponentially increasing frequency.

But this isn't even science. This gender shit is purely subjective and based on emotions and feelings, which is not something science was meant to deal with. There exists no scientific test you can administer that will tell you if a person is outside of the male-female dipole, short of asking the person how they feel, and that ain't science. The closest we have is the rare individual with less/more X or Y chromosomes, but they are not considered a different sex, nor do those chromosomal categories align with the genders on the made-up 'gender spectrum'.

Make no mistake everything about this gender ideology nonsense is 100% anti-science.

[–]FlyingKangaroo[S] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Fully agree.

Now I wonder if we’ll see any intersex (not SJW) organizations protesting against this. Because there are intersex people who protest against the gender nonsense; and this guide by WHO would actually further damage them by giving “scientific” approval for calling them some kind of “third gender” which is a harmful myth and I’m sure many are against it. How very inclusive of you WHO!

[–]JasonCarswellSisyphus / Ouroboros 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

New science is a nuisance, but I can do it too...

I feelz like the ruling class is out to get us.

[–]FlyingKangaroo[S] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

True. The lobotomy comparison that some people make is really on point. Funny how the SJWs would brag about white supremacy in science or how science damaged women because it was mostly developed by men but will cheerfully celebrate this.

[–]Alienhunter糞大名 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's all the popular science shit. For the average dumbass science is like magic cause they don't understand it they just think it's real. So it doesn't take much to write some science fiction shit and pass it off as hard science and the idiots will argue it like it's real.

It's telling that the adds in popular science magazine are mostly erection pills.

[–]JasonCarswellSisyphus / Ouroboros 10 insightful - 6 fun10 insightful - 5 fun11 insightful - 6 fun -  (2 children)

This reminds me that I have a rare old book from 1955, something like "How To Deal With The Negro In The Workplace". I should dig it up, take photos, and share.

[–]jet199 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

Yes please.

[–]JasonCarswellSisyphus / Ouroboros 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

I'll dig through my library.

[–]filbs111 8 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Hang on. This site is operated by the WHO? "Gender mainstreaming" seems like a term used by critics to criticise propaganda, but this is language they're openly using themselves. WHO? More like WTF! The Babylon Bee are going to have to up their game.

[–]FlyingKangaroo[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Looks so, even when you google WHO (the organization), this is the first link: https://www.who.int/ It’s their official domain. If WHO posted it, it really means that “gender mainstreaming” got really far...

[–]RedEyedWarriorThe Evil Cishomo 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Fuck the WHO. And fuck the UN. I do not trust these organisations at all.

[–]iamonlyoneman 5 insightful - 5 fun5 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

Sex is not limited to male and female . .. gender is on a continuum.

This is true. In much the same sense that fishing boats exist on a continuum between sinking and floating.

[–]FlyingKangaroo[S] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

The most ‘interesting’ points:

“3 Going beyond binary approaches to gender and health to recognize gender and sexual diversity, or the concepts that gender identity exists on a continuum and that sex is not limited to male or female.

4 Introducing new gender, equity and human rights frameworks and tools to further support capacity building around these concepts and the integration of their approaches in the work of WHO.”

Link to the manual from 2011 https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241501057

[–]ClassroomPast6178 11 insightful - 2 fun11 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Introducing new gender, equity and human rights frameworks

That conveniently ignore the genocide, organ harvesting and general appalling human rights abuses occurring in the PRC, because they now call the shots here at the WHO and are totally not using the language and concepts of Critical Social Justice to paralyse and undermine their economic and military counterparts in The West, whilst exporting their debt to dominance (The Belt and Road Initiative) strategy throughout the developing world. Fuck the CCP. Fuck all the greedy elite cunts here in The West that shoved their snouts in China’s trough and allowed them to buy up ports and infrastructure all over the world. Fucking traitorous cunts should be stood before a wall.

[–]FlyingKangaroo[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Exactly. They’re like “screw the wars, human trafficking, child abuse, poverty and so on, not supporting transition and correct pronouns is the human rights abuse!”.

When I saw this I felt we are is a really dark timeline. I want it to end soon.

[–]Newzok 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

How? I cannot fathom how this has become a thing for the WHO nor a mainstream opinion. It's mental! Who is pulling the strings, and how do supposedly intelligent leaders go along with this?

And my mantra I guess: why is idpol bulletproof? Why the fuck is it being pushed in every media outlet?

[–]jet199 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

https://www.firstthings.com/web-exclusives/2020/01/the-billionaires-behind-the-lgbt-movement

[–]Newzok 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Interesting, thank you!

So it's a coordination of multiple billionaires' lobby/charity groups, spreading money and thus influence through countless subgroups worldwide. Changing everything from government policy to school curriculum.

Isn't this what's called a color revolution?

[–]JasonCarswellSisyphus / Ouroboros 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Taste the rainbow.