WHO updates its widely-used gender mainstreaming manual — “(...) gender identity exists on a continuum and that sex is not limited to male or female.”

submitted by FlyingKangaroo from who.int

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]LtGreenCo 9 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

I love science when it's used correctly and not abused, which is unfortunately happening with exponentially increasing frequency.

But this isn't even science. This gender shit is purely subjective and based on emotions and feelings, which is not something science was meant to deal with. There exists no scientific test you can administer that will tell you if a person is outside of the male-female dipole, short of asking the person how they feel, and that ain't science. The closest we have is the rare individual with less/more X or Y chromosomes, but they are not considered a different sex, nor do those chromosomal categories align with the genders on the made-up 'gender spectrum'.

Make no mistake everything about this gender ideology nonsense is 100% anti-science.

[–]FlyingKangaroo[S] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Fully agree.

Now I wonder if we’ll see any intersex (not SJW) organizations protesting against this. Because there are intersex people who protest against the gender nonsense; and this guide by WHO would actually further damage them by giving “scientific” approval for calling them some kind of “third gender” which is a harmful myth and I’m sure many are against it. How very inclusive of you WHO!

[–]JasonCarswellSisyphus / Ouroboros 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

New science is a nuisance, but I can do it too...

I feelz like the ruling class is out to get us.