Saidit's 'free speech' is under attack from the new admin, who is of course a tranny. Check the moderation logs and see individual user posts to see what is being removed and ask yourself "is this level of censorship in line with saidit's rules, or are they serving a personal agenda'.

submitted by bobbobbybob from self.SaidIt

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]magnora7 37 insightful - 9 fun37 insightful - 8 fun38 insightful - 9 fun -  (63 children)

So you're mad there's too much shit being stirred up, so in response you stir up more shit? Genius

Amelia does the job right, and was the only one who actually wanted to help with this website instead of just blaming me for everything, like you are. What they do in their personal time is of no concern to me.

[–]NeedMoreCoffee 17 insightful - 5 fun17 insightful - 4 fun18 insightful - 5 fun -  (49 children)

I love you magnora7 and appreciate all you do for us <3

[–]magnora7 10 insightful - 4 fun10 insightful - 3 fun11 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

Thank you, cheers. I like your username, I'm going to make coffee now! :)

[–]NeedMoreCoffee 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

lol Thank you! :)

[–][deleted] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (46 children)

ditto

[–]Tom_Bombadil 12 insightful - 4 fun12 insightful - 3 fun13 insightful - 4 fun -  (45 children)

PSA: /s/socks is a confirmed shill.

[–]JasonCarswell 7 insightful - 5 fun7 insightful - 4 fun8 insightful - 5 fun -  (9 children)

Bonus confirmations: /s/Terminology/comments/7k6o/stabs_shills_trolls_and_bots/sfvu

[–]Tom_Bombadil 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

You may consider capitalizing the A in "and" to complete the acronym. STBs.

Maybe add an S word to the end, as well.

I dunno.

Edit: STABS deserves it's own sub.

Also, I'd suggest a banner with a person facing away andwearing a "Saidit" logo shirt who's getting stabbed in the back. Betrayal.

Plus, 75% transparent foreground words (betrayal, traitor, treason, infiltration, etc.); all spelled in red letters and dripping blood.

Or maybe that same character with the shirt in the Caesar senate stabbing scene where the senators are Gates, Faucci, zberg, Soros, etc.

Also, you could replace the "and" in STABs with "Attack", as in Shills, Trolls and Attack Bots, and Saboteurs.
Also maybe "Saboteurs".

/s/JasonCarswell for edits

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

STAB = Shill, Troll, and Bot or plural: STABs = Shills, Trolls, and Bots

I want the word to stab all the STABs in they eye, figuratively.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

You call u/socks a shill though and I'm pretty sure he's not.

[–]JasonCarswell 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

Did you even look at the links Tom and I provided? He's most certainly a shill perpetually pretending to be stupid on specific matters.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Yes and I don't see how that's proof of shilling.

[–]Node 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun -  (33 children)

I see I emphatically agreed in that thread, so this is going to sound a little weird. Socks replied to one of my comments in the past couple days with a legitimate reply! You'd never guess it was socks who typed it, but it really was! No shilling, just sentences that appeared to come from a normal user. It was pretty amazing.

[–][deleted] 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (32 children)

Ironic, I just wrote "You call u/socks a shill though and I'm pretty sure he's not. " to Jason.

He's just liberal and you guys disagree with him. Hell, I disagree with him a lot but I see where he's coming from.

[–]JasonCarswell 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (19 children)

He's 50% insightful and 50% shill. That's part of their shilling charm. Most people on SaidIt are too smart and/or independent to fall for their bullshit.

Edit: And/or skeptical.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (18 children)

Guess I am just dumb then. https://media1.tenor.com/images/f9d911691a9281ea303c0063ac961b72/tenor.gif?itemid=8142558

[–]JasonCarswell 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (17 children)

Edit: And/or skeptical.

IMO, you're smart and seem independent. However, you seem to not be skeptical enough to see the patterns of socks (and Chipit). Tom often seems too skeptical and hasty to call many shills, and rarely provides evidence.

Maybe Tom and I are wrong and he really is just a clever/stupid civilian with profound blind spots, tendencies to revert back to trusting the corporatocracy, and the talent to appear like annoying (and dangerous) agenda driven shills due to too much propaganda brainwashing.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (16 children)

Socks like opposition, I think that's what you're seeing. He's smart but he's also young. If he was a shill, why would he be here were the majority is unlikely to agree with him.

[–]Node 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (11 children)

I'm still slogging my way through that post, and just a few minutes ago saw socks doing another of his far-left shills against everything he considers 'Nazi'. It's a laughably ridiculous assortment of things that only share the characteristic of not being far-left.

But at least I'm convinced there's a real person operating the account. The only alternative to him not being a shill is to be someone of very limited intelligence, or to have a mental issue. It's a toss up for me between shill and mental, because I've seen him exhibit intelligence.

Can you explain where he's coming from?

socks 3 insightful - 0 fun - 14 hours ago*

Horrux - what would you want to post that is too extreme for Saidit? I see mainly far-right disinformation, misinformation, propaganda, racism, Nazis, sexism, anti-vax, anarchism, Republicans, hatred, criminals, and occasional informative posts on this site. That's one reason I visit the site (even if I don't agree with much of it, I won't see it elsewhere). I cannot imagine what you're talking about. Are you referencing material that's on Parler, Ruqqus, Win, Gab, 8chan, or 16chan? Really, what's missing here? [Edit: words]

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (10 children)

I think I'm the criminal he's referring to. Besides that it seems pretty self explanatory, was there something specific about it?

Hey u/socks, am I the criminal?

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (9 children)

Well... I don't know, Muskrat. One benefit of Saidit is that we can be anonymous (supposedly; though so many responses by users here respond with, something like: "I know what you are! You are a _____!" It's sometimes like dealing with 12-year-olds. I'm here to talk about the content, not the mysterious person behind the curtain.) So, if you are indeed a criminal, I'm not judging you... :-)

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

I just thought you might have been referring to me as a criminal. It wasn't a loaded statement. I mean, drugs ain't legal here and I do like my drugs.

[–]JasonCarswell 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

You're not here to talk about the content.

You're here to advocate your agendas between being insightful and friendly while denouncing Jimmy Dore calling out your fake progressive Democrats like liars AOC and Bernie - and to push pro-vaccine propaganda of the corporatocracy ignoring their message funding, while disingenuously claiming that anti-vaxxers are being funded by malicious forces.

[–]Node 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

Hey, I would want to help, but I'm already spread too thin to be reliable. I do what I can by forwarding spammer links to TAM when I run across them.

[–]magnora7 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Hey it's cool, even just forwarding spammer links (or reporting them) is helpful. I appreciate it

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

^

This is what we all must do.

[–]Akali 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Hold on, ''Was the only one who actually wanted to help'' ? Does that mean you are seeking mods? I'm not always there, but I look at the site about twice a day and I sometime see those weird X upvote / X smile in 15 min post with no comments about a publicity for a random application which are obviously bots so if you want a hand in clearing the frontpage, I don't mind helping.

[–]bobbobbybob[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

let me know how you do. M7 regularily turns down help

[–]Akali 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Well, still no answers so I suppose I was turned down as well. You were correct.

[–]bobbobbybob[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

m7 has some funny ideas, and his complaining isn't honest. Oh well

[–]bobbobbybob[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

bullshit. I offered to help, multiple times. It is only since you let tam take power that things ahve turned to shit, but keep blaming everyone else.

he told EVERYONE when you were out of action, in the guise of 'concern', yet for some reason you continue to breathe in his lies and think that his madness in some way helps.

but you are lost, mate. can't even see when your allies are offering a helping hand. Enjoy having your dream fucked

[–]magnora7 6 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 4 fun -  (3 children)

And I obviously made a good decision not choosing you, if this is how you conduct yourself.

[–]bobbobbybob[S] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

really? you'll defend tam to the hilt, but give me shit because I wrote a reasonably sensible, calm and thoughtful post. Tam can scream "you are an enemy of me and an enemy of saidit" at various users and that's OK, but I can raise my disquiet with their insane behaviours and 'good riddance?'

brainfuck, mate. you've been brainfucked

[–]magnora7 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

If comments like this are how my "allies" treat me, I'd hate to see how my enemies treat me!

[–]bobbobbybob[S] 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I'd hate to see how my enemies treat me!

with honeyed words and reality distorting lies.