all 21 comments

[–][deleted] 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (16 children)

Isn’t this illegal? Why is this necessary for children to be exposed to?

[–]jerkwad152 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Questioning it goes against the religious tenets of Diversity Inclusion Equity.

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (13 children)

A lot of kids get a distorted idea of what the range of normal bodies looks like. This can lead to unnecessary shame and distress if they feel that they are abnormal, or shock when they first encounter a normal body that it outside what they've been exposed to.

[–][deleted]  (10 children)

[deleted]

    [–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

    For instance: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/0092623X.2020.1787279

    Your over-puritanical approach to sex education is damaging.

    You should try to get over your childhood trauma, and don't perpetrate the cycle.

    [–][deleted]  (8 children)

    [deleted]

      [–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

      I gave you a scholarly article discussing the one field where factual information would have real benefits. This is counter-argument on the pyramid of debate.

      You have responded with ad-hominem. This is dragging the conversation down on the pyramid of debate, which is against saidit values.

      I have reported your comment and encourage you to do better in the future.

      [–][deleted]  (6 children)

      [deleted]

        [–][deleted] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

        I’m not sure where these people are going with this.

        “We should expose all minors to sex and nudity”.

        Why is this good.

        Because they talk about inclusion and diversity?

        [–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        Being aware of what different bodies look like isn't a poison. You seem to be confusing it with being sexually molested by your pastor.

        [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        I’m not sure where these people are going with this.

        “We should expose all minors to sex and nudity”.

        Why is this good.

        Because they talk about inclusion and diversity?

        [–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

        Real benefits?

        That's what I said. Yes.

        We have a generation of kids growing up that can't tell if they're boys or girls and are becoming increasingly suicidal.

        Interesting claim, but it is just contradiction. To construct and argument, you need to provide your source of information.

        Do we in fact have a generation of kids growing up that can't tell if they're boys or girls? That seems unlikely to me. What's the evidence of this claim, or did you just make it up?

        and are becoming increasingly suicidal.

        Again, plausible, given how climate change and geopolitics is going, but as you have stated it, it is just a claim. To keep up on the pyramid of debate you need to supply supporting evidence or citations.

        And just a reminder, they're not your kids.

        Are they yours?

        They don't belong to you, the school, the teachers, or the state. Just stay away from them.

        Should you stay away from them for the same reasoning?

        [–][deleted]  (1 child)

        [deleted]

          [–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

          Please try to follow the conversation. The questions you avoided:

          Do we in fact have a generation of kids growing up that can't tell if they're boys or girls? That seems unlikely to me. What's the evidence of this claim, or did you just make it up?

          What is your supporting evidence or citations for "A generation of kids ... are becoming increasingly suicidal."

          Also, you make a point that they're not my kids. I didn't understand the point you are trying to make, so i asked if they were your kids. I know they're not, but can you explain what point you think you were trying to get to work that comment?

          It's inexcusable that schools are essentially graduating barely functioning illiterates.

          You link to an article about education in Baltimore, which is in the US. The OP is school kids in the UK. The cause of the former is the terrible way that schools are funded in the US, and is unrelated to sex education in the UK.

          I think children should be protected from people like you.

          You realise that i think they should be protected from people like you, don't you?

          [–]BISH 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

          /s/ActuallyNot = Democrat pedo

          [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

          You are a pervert.

          [–]Godknight 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

          LGBTP.

          Slippery slope.

          Groomers.

          If (((they))) can't murder 800k babies per year in the womb, (((they)))'ll groom them and sterilize them.

          Your goddess Shiva can suck Jesus's balls and God will nuke us like he did Sodom and Gomorrah.

          [–]Canbot 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

          No surprise, they are all gay.

          [–]smeagol 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

          This is 'naked education' BS is ridiculous by any standard, though to add to ActuallyNot's thoughtful comments, and to let the alarmed Americans know: in the UK 'Naked Attraction' is a TV series (since 2016) that has a simple format of having 5 or 6 naked people in a row, in display boxes, gradually revealed, from the legs upward - with a rising curtain - while the guest is asked questions about which one to eliminate from the group. The final 2 or 3 naked people are revealed and the guest has to has to determine which one they find attractive. The guest also has to undress in the final scenes. The winning couple are thereafter expected to go on a date, and to report back in a few weeks. They're shown in a bar meeting, with predictably shallow discussions. When they return to the show for an interview, they - in the 2 examples I saw - reveal they didn't start a relationship. The show sometimes tries to explain the science of physical attraction. I think the show is on around 10 pm once per week, with reruns on other channels 2 other times per week on different free TV channels. There are m/w, w/m, m/m, w/w, participants to my knowledge. It NOT an attractive show my any stretch of the imagination. The discussions are very shallow. After seeing 1 or 2 of these shows you will likely have absolutely no interest in them. To add to /u/ActuallyNot's comments, a show like this with 'normal' bodies might help people worry less about their own bodies. My point is: kids have had weekly access to this show (and other TV shows with nudity in Germany and other parts of Europe). It's a lame show that kids will not like. (Kids also have access to the internet.) Both the Daily Star and this show are trying to get more viewers by discussing school children on the show. I agree it's fucked up, but I don't believe it should concern anyone.

          [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

          Yeah if kids wanna see nudity, they have iPhones and Google. This is stupid and funny, but not a big deal

          [–]Godknight 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

          No matter how degenerate this is...

          There is an even more degenerate parent out there who greenlit this for their kid, probably for money and clout.

          Make Parents Great Again

          [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

          Also, does this mean I can also show teenagers my penis too? We should leave them with some hope for the future, I have a magnificent penis

          [–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

          Also, does this mean I can also show teenagers my penis too?

          If you have been hiding your nudity from your kids until now, I wouldn't stop. You'll freak them out.

          But most of Europe doesn't have the hang up about nudity that Americans and Saudi Arabians have. Their kids turn out fine.

          [–]IkeConn 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

          Tennessee will hate this.

          [–]Alphix 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

          I can NEVER see the videos off this fucking site, drives me mad. This one less than others but still. Argh!

          OK, it's my adblocker, but if I turn it off, I have sound from 3 ads on top of the video, what the fucking hell?