Alleged Trans incident at upscale LA Spa may have been staged

submitted by HeimdeklediROAR from losangelesblade.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]HeimdeklediROAR[S] 2 insightful - 6 fun2 insightful - 5 fun3 insightful - 6 fun -  (15 children)

I mean they did mention that a source at the spa said there weren’t any trans people in the spa that day

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex 15 insightful - 2 fun15 insightful - 1 fun16 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

How would they know since, according to your own arguments, it is impossible to see if someone is male, female, or transgender?

[–]HeimdeklediROAR[S] 2 insightful - 7 fun2 insightful - 6 fun3 insightful - 7 fun -  (3 children)

All trans people have a gender appropriate cutie mark on their ass .

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex 12 insightful - 2 fun12 insightful - 1 fun13 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

you cant answer that one and had to back way up to a mediocre joke, huh?

[–]HeimdeklediROAR[S] 1 insightful - 7 fun1 insightful - 6 fun2 insightful - 7 fun -  (1 child)

I mean you’re question was worded offensively in the first place. Transgender people are not a separate category

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex 13 insightful - 1 fun13 insightful - 0 fun14 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yes they are Besides, you always skip to language policing when you realise you fucked up and have made an argument that contradicts your past ones.

You will never control my language or thought. Kindly respond to my actual points, admit you have been proven wrong, or just don’t respond further if all you’ll be doing is making futile attempts to make me obey you.

[–]MarkTwainiac 11 insightful - 3 fun11 insightful - 2 fun12 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Yes, many days after this incident, spa staff said that none of their regular trans-identified customers had booked specific services that day.

But that's not an indication of whether a penis & balls possessing human decided to avail himself of the spa's general entrance "trans friendly" policy in order to infiltrate female-only spaces that day.

[–]FlanJam 10 insightful - 2 fun10 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Now I'm confused. Why did you ask "How would you find evidence for a story about lack of evidence?" if you already have an example of evidence?

Rabbit holes aside, my point is this story is flimsy and probably shouldn't have been publish in this state.

[–]HeimdeklediROAR[S] 2 insightful - 6 fun2 insightful - 5 fun3 insightful - 6 fun -  (1 child)

I mean the evidence is the lack of evidence so it feels like a weird situation?

[–]FlanJam 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Well kind of, I guess? You pointed out a source at the spa, that's one kind of evidence. And like I mentioned before, you can seek out evidence that the woman planned to fabricated the incident. Not saying it would be easy to prove if it was staged. But the article should've sought out more evidence before claiming it may have been staged. At this point it just feels like conjecture.

[–]questioningtw 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

They could easily be saying that to try to cover their asses.

[–]HeimdeklediROAR[S] 1 insightful - 5 fun1 insightful - 4 fun2 insightful - 5 fun -  (4 children)

They don’t need to cover their asses there would have been nothing wrong if a trans woman were using the area.

[–]questioningtw 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

So then are there a bunch of people that said their was a male in the dressing room for no reason? Sorry, I just don't believe that.

[–]HeimdeklediROAR[S] 1 insightful - 4 fun1 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Two people so far, those making the accusations. That’s not a lot

[–]BiologyIsReal 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Only QT think that way, but most people don't think a male should be there just because he says he is a "woman". That is why TRA are saying now that this incident is a hoax made up by "transphobes" who want to smear trans identified people despite that Californian law does indeed allow any male to enter female only spaces as long as he says the magic words.

[–]HeimdeklediROAR[S] 1 insightful - 4 fun1 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Not really, people are saying it was a hoax because there appears to be no evidence to the contrary except for the words of some christian bigots.