you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]HeimdeklediROAR[S] 1 insightful - 5 fun1 insightful - 4 fun2 insightful - 5 fun -  (4 children)

They don’t need to cover their asses there would have been nothing wrong if a trans woman were using the area.

[–]questioningtw 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

So then are there a bunch of people that said their was a male in the dressing room for no reason? Sorry, I just don't believe that.

[–]HeimdeklediROAR[S] 1 insightful - 4 fun1 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Two people so far, those making the accusations. That’s not a lot

[–]BiologyIsReal 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Only QT think that way, but most people don't think a male should be there just because he says he is a "woman". That is why TRA are saying now that this incident is a hoax made up by "transphobes" who want to smear trans identified people despite that Californian law does indeed allow any male to enter female only spaces as long as he says the magic words.

[–]HeimdeklediROAR[S] 1 insightful - 4 fun1 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Not really, people are saying it was a hoax because there appears to be no evidence to the contrary except for the words of some christian bigots.