Black Man Rapes Woman on Public Train, Media Complains People Stood by and Watched by Ethnocrat in debatealtright

[–]ActuallyNot [score hidden]  (0 children)

Those rapes are obviously by black men, it's true the vast majority of rape has the victim and perpetrator being the same race.

Great. Show me the data.

As for the nonsense about black people apparently thinking they won't be believed for being black just fucking lol.

Only one woman went to the police about Holtzclaw. Only once he was charged did the other women come forward. 13 willing to testify. That's 12 that that didn't think they would be believed, but strong enough to go through the process, once it was clear that there would be an investigation.

There are exactly zero black people who believe they're discriminated against in America for being black, and coincidentally also exactly zero black people being raped by white people. Whereas there's tens of thousands of black on white rapes every year.

What the fuck are you smoking?

Black Man Rapes Woman on Public Train, Media Complains People Stood by and Watched by Ethnocrat in debatealtright

[–]ActuallyNot [score hidden]  (0 children)

Do these surveys also interview the alleged rapist and ask them their opinion about whether a rape has been committed?

Generally you don't track them down, no. That would be a lot more expensive study that a random survey.

We have this wonderful Anglo-Saxon tradition of juris prudence where you're innocent until PROVEN guilty.

This is not part of the justice system.

In other words you asked the other guy to disprove your evidence free assertion of bias

Either there is or there isn't. There's anecdotal evidence that race is a barrier to reporting rapes, as I have linked to.

It needs evidence on both sides. But he hasn't even shown his evidence for "In almost every case, the race of the victim and the perpetrator are the same." Yet, so lets leave the discussion of reporting bias until we understand the data he's referring to, as that will affect its relevance.

Black Man Rapes Woman on Public Train, Media Complains People Stood by and Watched by Ethnocrat in debatealtright

[–]ActuallyNot [score hidden]  (0 children)

What kind of children do you find not ugly enough that you want to molest them?

Network of Right-Wing Health Care Providers Is Making Millions Off Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin, Hacked Data Reveals by ActuallyNot in Coronavirus

[–]ActuallyNot[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

JAMA, Cochrane, some of the most respected sources in the English language world.

What's an example of a better source?

Black Man Rapes Woman on Public Train, Media Complains People Stood by and Watched by Ethnocrat in debatealtright

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I point out that in at least some instances black women don't report rape because they feel that being a black women, they won't be believed.

I mention this because a source is coming from /u/Mastermustard03 for his claim that "In almost every case, the race of the victim and the perpetrator are the same.", and the data is going to be difficult to interpret if it is convicted rapes, or even reported rapes.

But let him know that half-white half-Japanese is not white. He'll have to show that they are almost always raped by other half-white, half Japanese people.

Black Man Rapes Woman on Public Train, Media Complains People Stood by and Watched by Ethnocrat in debatealtright

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

How could you possibly know that and how can anyone objectively determine whether a rape has occurred without evidence or a trial?

You survey a sample of people.

If you're making the allegation of bias you have to prove it and not sit there and ask for evidence against your own as of now evidence free assertion.

I asked "How do you know that it's not that there's no black mothers reporting rapes of the daughters by white guys to the police, because the police are, in some areas, hostile to the black population?"

As part of my request for a source on the claim: "In almost every case, the race of the victim and the perpetrator are the same."

I didn't "allege" anything, friendo. But if you're going to allege that "In almost every case, the race of the victim and the perpetrator are the same", you need to supply the evidence, for your as of now evidence free assertion.

Black Man Rapes Woman on Public Train, Media Complains People Stood by and Watched by Ethnocrat in debatealtright

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

A large problem with rape in particular is that a small minority are reported. Contributing to this problem is that a tiny minority of reported crimes end in a prosecution.

If you're aware that race doesn't bias the reporting of child molestation, show me the data that supports that: Because I'd be interested to know.

I do know that there are instances of under-reporting of rape of black women by white men. Victims of Daniel Holtzclaw said that they didn't report being raped by him because "I didn't think anyone would believe me. I'm a black female."

Black Man Rapes Woman on Public Train, Media Complains People Stood by and Watched by Ethnocrat in debatealtright

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

In almost every case, the race of the victim and the perpetrator are the same.

Do you have a source on that one?

There are no white guys driving around to molest black girls.

How do you know that it's not that there's no black mothers reporting rapes of the daughters by white guys to the police, because the police are, in some areas, hostile to the black population?

Black Man Rapes Woman on Public Train, Media Complains People Stood by and Watched by Ethnocrat in debatealtright

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This includes child sexual abuse. Even if the media has done its best to cultivate the image of a bespectacled, fat white male sex offender, blacks molest, rape and physically abuse their children at higher rates both per capita and in general, only beaten out by native Americans.

Those sources only refer to the race of the victim.

Network of Right-Wing Health Care Providers Is Making Millions Off Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin, Hacked Data Reveals by ActuallyNot in Coronavirus

[–]ActuallyNot[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

1) There's no graphene oxide in the mRNA vaccines.

2) Of course it get into the cells. That where it acts. It doesn't get into the nucleus, so it doesn't get anywhere near the DNA of the cell.

The other points still stand. It isn't DNA and can't make DNA, so even if it was in the nucleus, it couldn't affect the genes.

COVIDLAND: The Lockdown (Full Movie) (1:48:23) a riveting and fast-paced movie made by award-winning filmmaker Paul Wittenberger and narrated by Alex Jones that’s designed to break people out of their trance, see the big picture, and take our world back! by JasonCarswell in Documentaries

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You don't know me very well then. I often admit mistakes. It's part of learning and growing. I'd rather be corrected than "right".

In my interactions with you in the past, when you're wrong, you start calling me "shill". In this case you said "go fuck yourself". Only in the following post did you confess "I quoted the video description."

When are you going to learn and grow that you're believing in proven perpetual liars

I don't believe everything I read. But some sources are much better than others. MSM are more often wrong than lying. The scholarly literature is much more reliable, but you have to be careful that our understanding is under constant review at the cutting edge, and there are predatory journals that publish a lot of bullshit, that can look exactly like a respectable peer reviewed journal to the amateur.

I have yet to see you actually admit errors

What error do you think I've made?

You can never get enough COVID vaccinations since it's so safe and effective.

I'll get a booster if the evidence shows that I should.

Network of Right-Wing Health Care Providers Is Making Millions Off Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin, Hacked Data Reveals by ActuallyNot in Coronavirus

[–]ActuallyNot[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Plenty of evidence shill.

You think saying what the facts are is shilling. You need to realign your beliefs back to reality.

Go look it up.

You think I haven't? You haven't read many of my comments have you.

SCIENTIST SHOWS VACCINE EFFECTS IN AUTOPSIES. DON'T BELIEVE IT? SEE FOR YOURSELF. by dissidentrhetoric in Coronavirus

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

When you're a quack giving a talk about quackery, ALWAYS WEAR A LAB COAT.

This will make everything you say sound plausible.

Dr. Cole says a lot of stuff thats not true: Idaho Doctor Makes Baseless Claims About Safety of COVID-19 Vaccines

And faces a complaint from Idaho Medical Association. Idaho doctors’ complaint against Dr. Cole is good news. Don’t count on it to save you

COVIDLAND: The Lockdown (Full Movie) (1:48:23) a riveting and fast-paced movie made by award-winning filmmaker Paul Wittenberger and narrated by Alex Jones that’s designed to break people out of their trance, see the big picture, and take our world back! by JasonCarswell in Documentaries

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I don't give a shit about the awards, I quoted the video description. Blame them, not the messenger.

Ha! I've never known you to accept you've made a mistake before, Jason. Congratulations on a small window into the world of rationality.

You probably should take more responsibility for quoting bullshit, but that's a relatively minor point.

Go fuck yourself - get a vaccination.

I've had many mate: Fully vaxed against COVID-19. From memory Influenza most of the last ten years. Polio. Yellow fever. Tetanus is getting old. Hepatitis B. Pertussis.

Which do you think I should get?

discussing whether or not vaccines are safe or not is not allowed on reddit. by humancorpse in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

For all medical articles on wikipedia they use cochrane.

Sensible. Cochrane are often the best authority on any particular treatment, because they go and get all the data from all the studies on the treatment.

So therefore it can't be trusted.

I think you're missing a step in the logic here. How did you get from they are cited often by wikipedia to they cannot be trusted?

Network of Right-Wing Health Care Providers Is Making Millions Off Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin, Hacked Data Reveals by ActuallyNot in Coronavirus

[–]ActuallyNot[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Your rhetoric is confident, but your biochemistry is crap.

mRNA doesn't get anywhere near the genes. It doesn't enter the cell nucleus. It operates, like all RNA, outside the nucleus. If it did, it couldn't change genes, because genes aren't made of RNA. There's the whole other half of the DNA missing. mRNA is not a retrovirus, which (which do make DNA from RNA). mRNA is not close to a retrovirus. A retrovirus has two copies of each gene. There is never anything that mRNA makes that could insert into DNA.

COVIDLAND: The Lockdown (Full Movie) (1:48:23) a riveting and fast-paced movie made by award-winning filmmaker Paul Wittenberger and narrated by Alex Jones that’s designed to break people out of their trance, see the big picture, and take our world back! by JasonCarswell in Documentaries

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Go fuck yourself professional nay-sayer of ill repute.

You post bullshit. It gets called out. Live with it, or don't post bullshit.

Next I suppose you are going to tell me that I didn't work on an Oscar-winning film.

I can tell you I couldn't work out what award Paul Wittenberger has won. Since your reply doesn't include any response to that, I'm guessing you can't either.

You're not welcome to comment on my posts or respond to my comments.

You're not welcome to post bullshit and strawman to avoid addressing the issue.

discussing whether or not vaccines are safe or not is not allowed on reddit. by humancorpse in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

They regularly find that an intervention isn't supported or isn't as good as another.

So they're not shilling for pharma.

Who are they shilling for?

And what do you be this claim on?

SaidIt Survey: Ban /u/JasonCarswell or keep it around? by ActuallyNot in AskSaidIt

[–]ActuallyNot[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Then shill doesn't mean what you think it means.

SaidIt Survey: Ban /u/JasonCarswell or keep it around? by ActuallyNot in AskSaidIt

[–]ActuallyNot[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

"Shill" for wearing masks?

So you're suggesting that there's someone making these $3 masks, and they've got together with everyone else making $3 masks, and they're concerned that although the vast majority of people wear masks, there's a few people who really don't care about other people, and they figure that to get the extra 3% of the market, they'll employ people to go to forums visited by literally tens of people and point out the actual fucking science of how airborne transmission is significantly reduced by wearing masks.

Then they hope that some part of those tens of people will be convinced by the reason, when they never used reason to come to the belief in the first place, and some part of them will by their brand. And so they pay me to point out the blatantly obvious on obscure forums?

Is that genuinely what you believe?

Because if so, you need to lay off the cool-aid, mate.

But how does that relate to not being able to tell a grand conspiracy theory.

I reckon I've got a rough idea. Flat earth. 911 truth. Pizzagate. Moon hoax. Vaccines aren't vaccines, they change your genes. That sort of crazy.

COVIDLAND: The Lockdown (Full Movie) (1:48:23) a riveting and fast-paced movie made by award-winning filmmaker Paul Wittenberger and narrated by Alex Jones that’s designed to break people out of their trance, see the big picture, and take our world back! by JasonCarswell in Documentaries

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

made by award-winning filmmaker Paul Wittenberger

It's not obvious what award he won. His IMDB page says Paul Wittenberger is known for his work on Race to Witch Mountain (2009), Crank (2006) and The Green Hornet (2011).. His roles in those movies was rigging electrician, production assistant and lighting technician, respectively.

He did make a bullshit conspiracy movie about fluoridation of water called The Great Culling, noted by skeptics for having no obvious rational basis.

and narrated by Alex Jones

Jones, on the other hand, claims to be a "playing a character", when defending his conspiracy theories in court. Which include that the U.S. moon landings were faked and that the government faked the Sandy Hook Elementary School mass shooting using actors.

that’s designed to break people out of their trance

This "trance" presumably being living in reality.

discussing whether or not vaccines are safe or not is not allowed on reddit. by humancorpse in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

are you capable of using the internet aside from attempting to illiterately spewing bullshit?

Yes. I didn't find anything to confirm your call.

I guess from your defensiveness you couldn't either?

You'd get more respect by admitting that you'd mis-remembered.

theres just as much evidence to the contrary, if not more.

I guess you can't point to any of that evidence either.

Biden down to 36%, 'sinking like the Titanic by P-38lightning in politics

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

What part?

SaidIt Survey: Ban /u/JasonCarswell or keep it around? by ActuallyNot in AskSaidIt

[–]ActuallyNot[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You wouldn't know a grand conspiracy if it sat on your face and looked like a mask.

What's your evidence for this claim?

Get homeschooled if necessary. It turns children into adults.

You were homeschooled?

Biden down to 36%, 'sinking like the Titanic by P-38lightning in politics

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Abortion is not under assault from conservatives,

It's gone, so it's been under assualt from someone. And it's Republican picked judges only that killed it.

Contraception could well be next. Banning that was unconstitutional for the same arguments that abortion was.

Biden down to 36%, 'sinking like the Titanic by P-38lightning in politics

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

He's not young. And men peak mentally in their mid twenties, at least for learning.

But I wouldn't have classified that as a learning disability. And he seems to be a lot better than the previous geriatric at listening to advice.

Or more motivated to do it.

SaidIt Survey: Ban /u/JasonCarswell or keep it around? by ActuallyNot in AskSaidIt

[–]ActuallyNot[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

American horror story?

Biden down to 36%, 'sinking like the Titanic by P-38lightning in politics

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Those Republicans who voted to impeach will not win their primaries.

You think it's coincidental that the Republicans that chief to impeach will be out of politics?

SaidIt Survey: Ban /u/JasonCarswell or keep it around? by ActuallyNot in AskSaidIt

[–]ActuallyNot[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

You've found a forum sufficiently free speech that you can be a racist cunt and not be banned.

The nature of such forums is you get called a racist cunt when you are a racist cunt.

Calling out racist cunts isn't an ulterior motive. It's the only correct response.

Either way...blocking you now.

CFT

Network of Right-Wing Health Care Providers Is Making Millions Off Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin, Hacked Data Reveals by ActuallyNot in Coronavirus

[–]ActuallyNot[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

There's no evidence either work for covid.

Network of Right-Wing Health Care Providers Is Making Millions Off Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin, Hacked Data Reveals by ActuallyNot in Coronavirus

[–]ActuallyNot[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I see you didn't read the article.

For one of the organisations making money:

AFLDS referred over 255,000 people to speak with physicians in order to get Covid-19 treatments. Of those people, 72,000 paid $90 for phone consultations, and many of those had follow-up consultations costing $59.99 each. The hacked data from Cadence Health does not include payment data itself, but doing the math, in just that two-month period, patients appear to have paid more than $6.7 million for phone consultations alone.

So you see that the money was charged for consultations, not by Merck, who don't recommend it for covid.

Network of Right-Wing Health Care Providers Is Making Millions Off Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin, Hacked Data Reveals by ActuallyNot in Coronavirus

[–]ActuallyNot[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

A million? That's way too high. Are you getting that from the VAERS and then assuming that all are real and attributed to the vaccination?

Network of Right-Wing Health Care Providers Is Making Millions Off Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin, Hacked Data Reveals by ActuallyNot in Coronavirus

[–]ActuallyNot[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

mRNA doesn't manipulate genes.

Biden down to 36%, 'sinking like the Titanic by P-38lightning in politics

[–]ActuallyNot 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

What learning impairment does Biden have?

Texas Says 'No!' to Covid Mandates - Ron Paul by magnora7 in videos

[–]ActuallyNot 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Well that's still legal. You have to wear the boxers.

And the mask.

Texas Says 'No!' to Covid Mandates - Ron Paul by magnora7 in videos

[–]ActuallyNot 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I'm pretty sure that's accountancy. Different faculty. I did mathematics in the science faculty. Accountancy is usually taught in the business faculty.

discussing whether or not vaccines are safe or not is not allowed on reddit. by humancorpse in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I would caution trusting cochrane though, they exist to shill for main stream medicine.

On the contrary. They're independent, and nearly the only body holding pharmaceutical products to account.

They have then running scared for some products. I recall in particular during the swine flu, governments were stockpiling Tamiflu, and Hoffmann-La Roche were making an absolute (and plausibly a literal) killing.

The refused to supply the data from the trials to cochrane, which is fucking incredible. And cochrane eventually determined that buying it was a dead waste of money.

They're rightly respected.

And I think common sense would say that talking to someone about problems would help.

The 12 steps isn't "talking to someone".

Step 2 is: Came to believe that a Power greater than ourselves could restore us to sanity.

Step 3 is: Made a decision to turn our will and our lives over to the care of God as we understood Him.

It's complete religious bullshit. the reason that it doesn't work is because it's not derived by finding the things that work.

Pfizer fires whistleblower who leaked COVID emails to Project Veritas. by x0x7 in videos

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Are you claiming you can say how?

Then how?

Biden down to 36%, 'sinking like the Titanic by P-38lightning in politics

[–]ActuallyNot 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

... Brandon?

Pfizer fires whistleblower who leaked COVID emails to Project Veritas. by x0x7 in videos

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

So there's some medical intervention that treats or cures some disease or disorder, but you don't know what.

It's given to non-consenting children, but you can't say how.

Its "vile beyond description", but it doesn't hurt anyone.

And anyone trying to find out what it is your fucking taking about, is boring and a pharma shill?

Oookay.

Oh, and it's "Chimera sauce". You may mean something by that, but fuck me for wondering what, right?

Pfizer fires whistleblower who leaked COVID emails to Project Veritas. by x0x7 in videos

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Re: "chimera sauce".

What is the product that you're taking about that is being injected into young children?

SaidIt Survey: Ban /u/JasonCarswell or keep it around? by ActuallyNot in AskSaidIt

[–]ActuallyNot[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I create meaningful dialogue. /u/JasonCarswell is the one disrupting it.

LIES

Another case in point. This chatbot or troll never engages in discussion.

Time to ban him and lift the level of discourse in here, and while enabling positive influences to culture a bit of rationality.

What haven't you done to shill bullshit?

Provide reliable sources for my information and rational argument.

Biden down to 36%, 'sinking like the Titanic by P-38lightning in politics

[–]ActuallyNot 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You'd think.

But you'd think they wouldn't choose him the first time.

Trump still controls the GOP. Those Republicans who voted to impeach will not win their primaries.

His legacy is the fall of the US into theocracy. Abortion illegal in many states. Contraception will follow. Which books in a huge increase in violent crime in 15 years, and more resources moved into policing and corrections, at the expense of infrastructure and education.

Biden down to 36%, 'sinking like the Titanic by P-38lightning in politics

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Is "fair" really negative?

Excellent+Good+Fair gives Biden about 55% approval. Which is better than other polls.

He seems to be sitting at about 45% approval. Which is tanking.

That's worse at this point in the presidency than any president since Ford. Who had just pardoned Nixon.

Not counting Trump of course. He didn't have 45% when he was elected.

The retreat from Afghanistan was too rushed, and people have died in the chaos. I only hope he's learned from Ford and continues to pursue Trump for his corruption.

Pfizer fires whistleblower who leaked COVID emails to Project Veritas. by x0x7 in videos

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Using fetal material of any source, as an ingredient, for any reason, is vile beyond description.

"Ingredient" probably isn't correct. They're probably isolating a protein generated by the cell, not that is part of the cell. But it's difficult to discuss when you haven't said what it is that you're talking about: What is the product that is derived from this lung tissue?

And "Fetal material" isn't correct. The cell line has been grown for decades in labs. The original cells were isolated from an embryo, but those cells are long gone.

And I don't follow "is vile beyond description". I understand why we are ethically bound to not hurt people, and even help them if we can. But most pregnancies end in miscarriage. Why the fuck should it matter if some of those cells are used to help people?

Can you get me to understand why it is "vile beyond description"?

Texas Says 'No!' to Covid Mandates - Ron Paul by magnora7 in videos

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

There's mathematical structures where that is true. Not very interesting if by 1 you mean the multiplicative identity, and by "+" you mean a binary operation over which multiplication is distributive. Which is the normal meaning in group theory.

I can't think of one that has more than the one element.

But while this journey down discrete mathematics memory lane is fun, this has nothing to do with statistics.

Free Covid Tests by zyxzevn in NoNewNormal

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Covid-19 are the disease with symptoms.

Yeah, okay. Technically COVID-19 is the disease. But colloquially, you get a "COVID-19" test and people know what that means.

Without symptoms you do not spread the disease due to low viral load,

That's not true. There are many cases of asymptomatic people spreading the infection.

"Combined, these baseline assumptions imply that persons with infection who never develop symptoms may account for approximately 24% of all transmission." - https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2774707

but you can spread the immunity.

What?

The SARS-Cov2 virus can be everywhere, and you probably had it a several times.

I probably haven't.

The symptoms are very similar to the flu and were mixed up a lot.

Yes. For less serious cases.

The tests of Covid are really bad, with 95% to 100% false positives.

Nowhere near that high. PCR tests for SARS-Cov2 are most likely somewhere in the 0.8% to 4.0%, which is the interquartile range of the studies aggregated for this paper, looking at false postives in SARS-COV2 tests: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.04.26.20080911v1.full

Texas Says 'No!' to Covid Mandates - Ron Paul by magnora7 in videos

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I understand monkey's frustration that many people don't understand statistics. It's good to talk with other people with a basic understanding of sampling, bias and significance testing. I was just letting him know that if you uses technical jargon to explain his points formally, I will understand.

Is there some "basic shit" about statistics that you think I don't understand?

I'd be interested if you could articulate what.

Pfizer fires whistleblower who leaked COVID emails to Project Veritas. by x0x7 in videos

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They've been using fetal tissue (lung cells IIRC) to culture other human serums.

Okay. For what purpose?

The Catholic Church acknowledges this, strongly indicating this is a fact.

Really? I would've though that Pfizer would be a better source of information about what Pfizer are producing than the catholic church. The Catholic church won't even say what the Catholic church are up to with respect to money laundering and raping children. They're not an especially compelling indication of fact.

They supposedly filter out cellular components, and whatnot. This still contains human proteins, etc.

Plausible. They're a pharmaceutical company. Human proteins would be the ones you'd use to treat a human. Do you know which products?

The "filtered" argument is fairly weak.

What is it arguing?

Let someone make a serum with dog poo, and argue that the solution is "filtered".

What?

1) Dog poo doesn't make a serum.
2) The issue with injecting dog poo is that it's going to be contaminated with bacteria and possibly other pathogens.
3) A human cell line isn't contaminated with bacteria or other pathogens.
4) I presume they're not straining it through filter paper when they filter it. There'll be a biochemical process that isolates the desired proteins.

Injecting this mystery material bypasses all of the normal biological defense systems.

What is the product that is derived from this lung tissue?

The reason I ask is because I'm not clear on where is it injected, what it treats, or why and how it bypasses "normal biological defense systems". ... By which you mean the immune system?

The filtered cellular lung poo is within you. Defiled.

Okay. So you think lung tissue is contaminated with bacteria and pathogens in the same way as faeces, and so it's defiled.

You might be mistaken. Faeces is waste material from an animal. A cell line of fetal lung tissue isn't. It's living cells.

To be fair, you're drawing a pretty long bow to get from embryonic cell line to dog faeces. They're very dissimilar.

Pfizer fires whistleblower who leaked COVID emails to Project Veritas. by x0x7 in videos

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Pfizer used the HEK 293 line didn't they?

It's not known whether is was from an abortion or a spontaneous miscarriage. It's only known that the line derives from cells isolated in the Netherlands in the early 1970s. (And that they're embryonic kidney cells).

Traditional vaccines grow the virus in chicken eggs, before the protein that the immune system is to be trained to recognize is separated off the viruses. But you still test what happens in a human cell as part of the development, generally speaking. Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine is like that. And they used the HEK 293 cell line as part of the development.

But it's much more obvious in the case of the mRNA vaccines, because they don't do the chicken egg bit. The vaccine doesn't do anything until it is in a human cell, and then it generates the spike protein. You'd need to stick it in a human cell to see if it does what you hope, and makes the spike protein.

SaidIt Survey: Ban /u/JasonCarswell or keep it around? by ActuallyNot in AskSaidIt

[–]ActuallyNot[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Fuck /u/ActuallyNot.

If you want. Get his consent first of course.

Look at the guy's post history. Look closely. Claims supported by sources. Appropriate disbelief at drunk-deeply-from-the-coolaid posts. Short with racists.

He's a cuck shill for vaccines, suckling the Covid tit.

By which you mean he points out that vaccines are very positive overall for human health, and particularly important for overcoming covid?

This is what paid shills do. They try to behave like a normal person but their goal is to:

Shill for the cause.

Disrupt meaningful dialogue.

Discredit and fracture cohesive communities.

No one is going to come to saidit to shill unless the traffic increases several orders of magnitude. I create meaningful dialogue. /u/JasonCarswell is the one disrupting it.

And his continual, repeated dragging down the pyramid of debate is the sort of thing that is discrediting this community.

Look how he created this thread, fleshed it out with links, went in to detail and tries to divide people in to vax/anti vax.

I didn't notice I did that. What have i done that attempts to divide people into vax and anti-vax?

I already blocked him but sadly I enjoy the comical value of what shilly niggers, jews and faggots have to say.

And now we see the racists cunts coming out to keep the community here down.

SaidIt Survey: Ban /u/JasonCarswell or keep it around? by ActuallyNot in AskSaidIt

[–]ActuallyNot[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I wasn't really thinking of a grand conspiracy theory peddling websites. Kind of the opposite really. Good thinking in terms of sound evidence, and rational thought.

More along the lines of:
https://goodthinkingsociety.org/
https://www.coursera.org/learn/skepticism
or even
https://www.theskepticsguide.org/

SaidIt Survey: Ban /u/JasonCarswell or keep it around? by ActuallyNot in AskSaidIt

[–]ActuallyNot[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I have 2 "strikes" and will be banned with the 3rd strike, merely for saying twice what Carswell has said 100s of times.

Whoa! Really?

I thought that this place was attracting the conspiracy theory nutjobs and the 13 year old edgelords who say "nier nier ni**er cuck cuck cuck" because they weren't tolerated in most forums. I didn't know that they're actively weeding out rational voices here.

Free Covid Tests by zyxzevn in NoNewNormal

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You're suggesting that you can't have COVID-19 until you have symptoms?

So neither believe in the fact that the virus has to build up to a certain level before your immune systems responds noticeably. Nor do you believe in asymptomatic carriers?

None of that sounds right.

Pfizer fires whistleblower who leaked COVID emails to Project Veritas. by x0x7 in videos

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The issue is hiding information. If that didn't happen, maybe more people would consider taking the jab.

Hidden?

Who the fuck would assume that an mRNA vaccine hadn't been injected into a human cell as part of the development?

The whole thing works by utilising the resources and the chemistry of a human cell. Of course it's going to be developed using human cells. You don't have to announce the bleeding obvious to ensure that people know. Because it's bleeding obvious.

Pfizer fires whistleblower who leaked COVID emails to Project Veritas. by x0x7 in videos

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Everything she reported is already old news in other versions of their serums.

You use human cells to see what something will do when injected into a human. It's not an "other version of their serums" thing, it's simply a step that you would take. Especially with an mRNA vaccine, that needs to do its thing in a human cell.

This isn't red meat for the pubic to push back against.

I'm not familiar with the metaphor here. Do the public push back against red meat?

It's a beef human jerky rawhide for the MSM to pretend at controversy.

It's one of those human cell lines that you can buy for medical research. Originally harvested back in the 1950s. It's not rawhide. It's not jerky. It's a cell line.

But it's also a defiler's confession.

"Defiler"? How so?

This way they can someday morally claim the public knew what they were accepting into their bodies.

The vaccine doesn't have human cells in it. It's just tested on a human cell line.

Texas Says 'No!' to Covid Mandates - Ron Paul by magnora7 in videos

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yep. Discrete Mathematics. Says on the degree.

SaidIt Survey: Ban /u/JasonCarswell or keep it around? by ActuallyNot in AskSaidIt

[–]ActuallyNot[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I like jason and he is for free speech.

No he's not. Look at this submission of his.

This post is not though.

Apart from blagging on for less, and linking to actual evidence, it's pretty much identical to a post by the person who you claim is for free speech.

Bias?

Texas Says 'No!' to Covid Mandates - Ron Paul by magnora7 in videos

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

you simply DO NOT understand the art form known as “statistics”, nor do you understand how easily they are manipulated to make them say whatever you want them to says.

I have a degree in mathematics and my job often involves statistical analysis.

So assume I can understand the jargon: What specifically is a better statistical analysis of the data?

statistics are not data. these are completely different forms of expression. one is unarguable fact, the other is a vehicle of personal politics.

Hmm. Which do you claim is which? Are you suggesting raw data is "unarguable fact" independent of how it is collected? Or that it is a vehicle of personal politics because it can be biased by the methods of collection?

I’m too free by goobandit in memes

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

After 2,977 victims were killed in September 11, 2001 the patriot act was passed, that allowed unprecedented surveillance of US citizens, including the tapping of domestic phones. There was some grumbling but overall the reaction to increased checks, the requirement to show papers to travel, and accessing of personal communications by the government was accepted given the risk.

After 718,000 victims were killed in the US from the covid pandemic, people seem to be objecting to wearing masks when they go out.

The long term effect of mask wearing is that facial recognition software is less reliable. The requirement is less laborious than putting on other clothes. But these people don't object to having to put their dick inside their pants when they go out ... do they?

What's the real issue here, because surely we can agree that this "freedom" thing makes no fucking sense.

"I thought that Black lives matter" | From slaves to human guinea pigs… Why the dark history of Black America justifies the vaccine hesitancy. by Orangutan in politics

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Interesting to see the anti-vax being pushed to blacks.

The basis of the Trump anti-vax position, was likely the increased susceptibility of minorities to COVID. So spreading it as far as possible improved the Trump margin in closely fought electorates.

However, this started backfiring when supporting the GOP became more associated with death from COVID via vaccine hesitancy.

There's two things you could do about that. The first, trying to get conservatives to back out and get vaccinated doesn't work.

The other thing you could do is this. Let's see how it goes.

Why Is PayPal Denying Service to Palestinians? by Drewski in TechCompanies

[–]ActuallyNot 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

The EFF do good work. More power to them.

A record 4.3 million Americans quit their job in August. Is a global economic catastrophe incoming? by casparvoneverec in debatealtright

[–]ActuallyNot 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

There's 7.7 million unemployed in the US, so 4.3 million unemployable doesn't imply insufficient labour.

And insufficient labour in the US doesn't imply a global economic catastrophe. It just implies that employers in the US will have to compete with each other a bit, raising wages.

Pfizer fires whistleblower who leaked COVID emails to Project Veritas. by x0x7 in videos

[–]ActuallyNot 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Company executives discussed how to best hide information from the public regarding the use of fetal cell lines derived from aborted babies in the development of the COVID vaccine.

Jesus please us. Do we live in a world where you have to hide that you've got a human cell to test a vaccine that you're going to inject into humans?

What the fuck should we be using? Handfuls of sand?

She Is Still Healthy? by EndlessSunflowers in funny

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I said "and other storylines", meaning not only that embarrassing idiocy.

Yes. When you say "and other stategic storylines that glamorize "witches", you're saying that that one and other one's "glamorize witches". It doesn't have any fantasy elements such as witches. Or any other magic.

You're missing a lot of things.

What is an '"orange man bad: spell'?

SOY MOUTH

What's a SOY MOUTH ... besides soy milk and vermouth?

Texas Says 'No!' to Covid Mandates - Ron Paul by magnora7 in videos

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Texas has had 4,140,000 cases of COVID-19 resulting in 68,075 deaths.

So far.

For comparison 2,996 people died in the September 11 attacks of 2001, which resulted in significant losses of freedom, a lot more substantial than putting on a mask when you go out.

(You still have to put on pants when you go out. No one seems to be complaining about that).

Texas Says 'No!' to Covid Mandates - Ron Paul by magnora7 in videos

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Is that generally true?

For instance, laws ban me from releasing sarin gas near my neighbor's fence, when the wind is blowing towards their property.

But even though I can't do that, I think that it's not true to say that "there is no freedom". I have other freedoms. I can plant whatever trees I want on my side of the fence, for instance.

The science is getting more and more complicated every day by Orangutan in politics

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Someone found a photo of them without masks. I found one of them with masks.

So which one is the photo op/theatre?

The photos in the original post are mostly people actually posing for the photo. So the claim that that's when they wear masks is not proven.

SaidIt Survey: Ban /u/JasonCarswell or keep it around? by ActuallyNot in AskSaidIt

[–]ActuallyNot[S] 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

You reap what you sow.

I tend to provide sources and sound reasoning. /u/JasonCarswell doesn't do that. He just drags down the discussion on the pyramid of debate when presented with facts.

If you have problems having discussions with him, block him.

Good idea. However, its approach is to start threads like this one.

The rest of the users here are likely not going to be sympathetic to your argument, especially considering that you've rubbed many the wrong way.

If facts or reasoned arguments rub you the wrong way, you probably just need to consider your beliefs. Cognitive dissonance is a bitch.

SaidIt Survey: Ban /u/JasonCarswell or keep it around? by ActuallyNot in AskSaidIt

[–]ActuallyNot[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I only call out bullshit, and that's all you shovel at us.

You do nothing of the sort. You just say "BULLSHIT" and "LIES" when presented with an argument that goes against the dangerous lies that you are attempting to spread.

NEVER-ENDING BULLSHIT LIES.

Case in point. No premise. No reasoning. Just dragging down the discussion, plain and simple.

I am, and have, and do.

You do not. See the links in the top thread.

Find my bullshit.

There's some in this very post.

Find where I've insulted you.

See the examples of dragging down the discussion on the pyramid of debate linked in the submission post.

You can't.

I just did. Would you like to go through the examples one by one?

If I wanted to insult you, you would never forget it

Oooh! Gosh!

What a reasoned response, high on the pyramid of debate. "I'm not interested in reasoned argument, but I could insult you on a minor internet forum SO MUCH."

Really?

Can I ask how old you are?

  • and it could be even worse if you weren't cowardly and anonymous. Show us a photo.

Sure. You go first.

Division and censorship is what tyranny, their minions, and shills would like

So that's why you've tried banning me.

Which are you; in favour of tyranny, a minion or a shill?

Actually, go fuck yourself, your sealioning, and your lies, authoritarianism, and big pharma propaganda.

Another case in point. This is why this community would be so much better without you.

She Is Still Healthy? by EndlessSunflowers in funny

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

The same cosmopolitan neoliberal shitheads who watch "The Handmaid's Tale" and other stategic storylines that glamorize "witches"

The handmaids tail is a story set in a distopian future where part of the US has descended into theocracy. There's no fantasy elements like magic.

as part of an anti-white-man and anti-christian Hollywood tactic of instilling "feminist freedom" and anti-white-nation aspirations

Wait. Is the handmaids tale "anti-white man" because it has women as lead characters? Or because the antagonists are white generally white?

and ushering in a globalist tyranny leading the way through medical tyranny.

Okaaay. I'm missing a couple of the steps here. What is globalist tyranny, and how do you get there from "medical tyranny", which I assume means asking people to look after eachother and the economy by wearing masks and social distancing until they can be vaccinated?

Even a lot of the fucking "witch groups" were doing "orange man bad" spells

Okaaay. What is an '"orange man bad: spell'?

SaidIt Survey: Ban /u/JasonCarswell or keep it around? by ActuallyNot in AskSaidIt

[–]ActuallyNot[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Good idea.

Do they have schools for good thinking?

SaidIt Survey: Ban /u/JasonCarswell or keep it around? by ActuallyNot in AskSaidIt

[–]ActuallyNot[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I'm only rude to the two people

That's not the point. The point is you're continually dragging down the pyramid of debate. The rules say you should be banned for that.

And they're good rules. The quality of the discussion in here would be very good without you around, throwing insults instead of discussion points, and always taking the russian propaganda lines of trying to get western democracies to extend the impact of the pandemic on their people and economies.

It would be okay if you were genuine, and could support your position. But you just spread bullshit then drag the discussion down to insults.

The community is good without you.

The science is getting more and more complicated every day by Orangutan in politics

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I don't recognize the others, but her majesty the Queen, the right honourable cockwomble Boris, and the Duke of Cambridge all wear masks when the situation warrants.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/entertainment/celebrities/2020/11/08/queen-elizabeth-wears-mask-first-time-public-outing/6213154002/
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/wear-masks-in-shops-boris-johnson-tells-britain-9vq2mkp9s
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-11-02/prince-william-reportedly-contracted-coronavirus-covid-19-april/12838110

They're all vaccinated, and the Duke and the cockwomble have also been infected, which adds to the immune response.

discussing whether or not vaccines are safe or not is not allowed on reddit. by humancorpse in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

The vaccines are a lot safer than COVID. There's more than enough data that shows this now.

Do you want me to go through some of it with you?

discussing whether or not vaccines are safe or not is not allowed on reddit. by humancorpse in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Actually, experimental injection.

It's a vaccine. It vaccinates against COVID-19. It's no longer experimental. It's been though phase 1, phase 2 and phase 3 testing. And billions have been vaccinated.

Actually, harming and KILLING COUNTLESS LIVES

There's no evidence that it's killing more than a few per million. Countless fewer than it's saving.

Actually, there is no justification for this tyrannical harmful lockdown (or your BULLSHIT).

Reducing the spread of a disease that is killing people is the justification for the lockdowns.

Quarantine the sick and weak, the rest is obvious tyranny.

Plausible if by weak you mean unvaccinated. Is that not what we're doing?

Actually, go fuck yourself, your sealioning, and your lies, authoritarianism, and big pharma propaganda.

QFT

discussing whether or not vaccines are safe or not is not allowed on reddit. by humancorpse in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Reported too for dragging down the pyramid of debate.

discussing whether or not vaccines are safe or not is not allowed on reddit. by humancorpse in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

ok, let me hold your hand and show you how to use the internet:

"... or of a portion of the pathogen's structure that upon administration to an individual stimulates antibody production or cellular immunity against the pathogen but is incapable of causing severe infection"

This correctly describes many of the vaccines. It describes the product of the mRNA vaccines.

discussing whether or not vaccines are safe or not is not allowed on reddit. by humancorpse in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Reported for dragging down the conversation on the pyramid of debate.

Do you have a point that you would like to articulate?

discussing whether or not vaccines are safe or not is not allowed on reddit. by humancorpse in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

If you don't want to engage the subtext is:

1) Of course its a fucking vaccine.
2) They are not fucking poisons. They are vaccines. The only poisons people inject are the dumbarses who inject botulism toxin.
3) There's no LD50, so no justification for calling it a poison.

Respond to the points rather than the questions if you object to a conversation in which I directly ask for your understanding.

discussing whether or not vaccines are safe or not is not allowed on reddit. by humancorpse in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

not sure what language this sentence is supposed to be in.

Good point. "Infections" should have been "infectious".

did your translate program fail on this one?

If you can't pass a sentence with one letter wrong, you must have a lot of trouble with accents. Do you have a lot of trouble understanding spoken English?

shes also famous for possibly having nothing to do with it at all.

I didn't know that. Her wiki page doesn't mention that. Do you have a source I could read?

you dont do much research on your bullshit do you?

The point is asymptomatic carriers exist. I the case of COVID-19, that's everyone in their first week of infection.

discussing whether or not vaccines are safe or not is not allowed on reddit. by humancorpse in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]ActuallyNot 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's got a foothold in America for historical reasons. Courts will often require AA attendance as part of conditions for drunk driving or antisocial behaviour.

They're heavily religious based, and many judges are religious, so they probably genuinely believe in it as an approach, despite the lack of evidence. It raises constitutional questions regarding separation of church and state, but the US is descending away from rationality and towards theocracy at the moment, at least at a supreme court level, so that's likely to get worse for a couple of generations.

discussing whether or not vaccines are safe or not is not allowed on reddit. by humancorpse in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

There is no science without debate.

And yet the converse isn't true.

discussing whether or not vaccines are safe or not is not allowed on reddit. by humancorpse in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They vaccinate against COVID-19.

In what way aren't they vaccines?

How are they poisons?

If they are poisons, what is the LD50?

If you don't know the LD50, how do you know they're poison?

discussing whether or not vaccines are safe or not is not allowed on reddit. by humancorpse in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

im more concerned with people, in this thread even, still using the word 'vaccines' as if thats what this shit is.

Okaaay.

What are the vaccines?

discussing whether or not vaccines are safe or not is not allowed on reddit. by humancorpse in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]ActuallyNot 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

my next door neighbor who can still barely stand after 2 months of her first jab might disagree with this nonsense.

They're not as dangerous as COVID-19.

TTS affects 2-3 people per 100,000 vaccinated.

Long covid affects about 1/3rd of people infected, and death affects about 1,000-2,000 for every 100,000 infected in the first world.

discussing whether or not vaccines are safe or not is not allowed on reddit. by humancorpse in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]ActuallyNot 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Imagine a vaccine so safe you have to be threatened to take it.

I didn't have to be threatened to take it. I can see why medical professionals and service providers should not be able to work without the vaccination, unless they're medically unable to get it.

For a disease so deadly you have to be tested to know you have it.

The reason you have to be tested is that you're infectious for about a week and a half before you're symptomatic.

Having said that, lots of deadly diseases have carriers that are not symptomatic: Including covid-19. Typhoid Mary was a famous unsymptomatic carrier of typhoid.

discussing whether or not vaccines are safe or not is not allowed on reddit. by humancorpse in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

If it's not a medical experiment, then it's a social one.

In which case you're a guinea pig too.

I think it's both though.

Big experiment. 6.52 billion doeses have been administered. Surely a few million would be enough to measure medical outcomes.

What outcomes do you think they're looking for?

discussing whether or not vaccines are safe or not is not allowed on reddit. by humancorpse in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They're a lot safer than COVID.

And they're great from a technology perspective. Certainly the mRNA ones.

The jab isn't enough. by trident765 in Coronavirus

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

True. Even once everyone is vaccinated, you still want to be careful around people with comorbidities.

Cold case team says Zodiac Killer ID'd, linking him to another murder by Zapped in news

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

... maybe ...

Atlanta hate hoax: Author of KKK notes turns out to be black woman by Chipit in news

[–]ActuallyNot 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I wonder what the motivation is.

Murder Pandemic: Fourth Straight Month With More Homicides than COVID Deaths in Washington, D.C. by Rob3122 in news

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

1) Define "savages"

2) Provide evidence

Murder Pandemic: Fourth Straight Month With More Homicides than COVID Deaths in Washington, D.C. by Rob3122 in news

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I'm not sure that they do always investigate.

The areas where murders are mostly unsolved have a tendency to have high black populations.

Worth the Watch: Fauci and HHS in October 2019 Plotting to Use a Flu Virus from China to bring in mRNA Vaccines by Orangutan in politics

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No he's not.

In the first cut of him, he's saying that an influenza focussed entity should exist in order for solutions to influenza to be found.

In the second cut off him, he's saying that in the future, it's not crazy that the technology could become available to produce a vaccine very fast. Faster than a pandemic can arrive from China, so long as its RNA had been sequenced.

Murder Pandemic: Fourth Straight Month With More Homicides than COVID Deaths in Washington, D.C. by Rob3122 in news

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Not investigating murders in black areas, while investigating them in white areas is racism.

I've had people claiming to be police say words to the effect of the victim is a criminal too, so why try to stop the killings. You might save someone who kills more people later.

Murder Pandemic: Fourth Straight Month With More Homicides than COVID Deaths in Washington, D.C. by Rob3122 in news

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The reason is surely racism.

The executive function rationalisation is that in these areas the murderers and the murdered come from the same pool of people, and so investigating them is a low priority: The dead guy was most likely a bad guy.

Worth the Watch: Fauci and HHS in October 2019 Plotting to Use a Flu Virus from China to bring in mRNA Vaccines by Orangutan in politics

[–]ActuallyNot 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Someone's gone to a lot of effort to cut the discussion in such a way that a conspiracy theorist might misinterpret it.

They aren't talking about mRNA, they're talking about finding a vaccine that will work against all the varieties of influenza. The discussion is about how get the research done, not the roll out of a solution.

"Why don't we blow this thing up?" is talking about "disruptive" research needed to find a universal flu vaccine.

"There might be a call for an entity that is completely disruptive" is talking about bringing young researchers to the field of influenza research. An influenza-focused entity is discussed.

After Fauci talks about the minimum decade of research to be done, he goes on to talk about the governments role is make sure that industry doesn't damage public health for profit, which is interesting.

"we really do have a problem with how the world perceives influenza" is talking about the fact that while influenza kills hundreds of thousands in a good year, and millions if there's a pandemic, people don't fear flu the way they do HIV or cancer.

The part about "an outbreak of a novel avian virus could occur in China somewhere" is speculating about future technology, an unknown way off. Here mRNA is mentioned as a possible technology for that.