you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Canbot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (23 children)

You really need to do something about your obsession.

I'm open to discussing alternative theories. Who is behind the race mixing messaging that targets white women?

[–]jet199Instigatrix 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (21 children)

Biological instinct.

Skin colour is a sexually dimorphic trait, men have slightly darker skin colour than women.

This means some white women react the same way when they see a black guy that some men react when they see pair of enormous fake beach ball sized boobs.

You can't really claim it's being pushed on them because in the media 90% of mixed race couples are white guys with black women as WW/BM couples are seen as very lower class and so not aspirational.

[–]Inevitable_Host 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (17 children)

Lol! Nonsense. How would you explain why white men are not interested in black women, at all, for the most part? I also totally disagree that white men with black women is more common in the media - the opposite is true. And if you look at real world interracial attraction studies, they show that white women primarily like white men. It's not just white women either, in online dating studies showed that asian, white and latino women responded most often to white men by fair margins. Only exception is black women who responded to black men most. On the opposite side, asian women are the most popular with men, getting the most responses from black, white and latino men, with only asian men preferring latino women. The LOWEST response rates among women were white, asian and latino women to black males, with only black women differing by responding least to white men. When it came to the lowest responses from men, it was every single racial group to black women. If that's not enough, we literally have quotes of jews who explicitly set out to manipulate the public going back a hundred years to achieve the outcome we're talking about here, for example (see replies to this)

[–]Inevitable_Host 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

N* = starts with N and ends with gr0w. "We must realise that our Party's most powerful weapon is radical tension. By pounding into the consciousness of the dark races that for centuries they have been oppressed by the Whites we can mould them to our program. The terms "Colonialism" and "Imperialism" must be featured in our propaganda. In America we will aim for subtle victory while inflaming the N* minority against the Whites, we will endeavour to Instill in Whites a guilt complex for exploiting the N. We will aid the N's to rise to prominence in every walk of life, in the professions and in the world of sport and entertainment. With this prestige, the N* will be able to intermarry with the Whites and begin a process which will deliver America to our cause." - An excerpt from Israel Cohen's book "Communist tactics for the Twentieth Century" written in 1912.

[–]Inevitable_Host 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (9 children)

"Our control Commissions will, in the interest of peace and wiping out our interracial tensions, forbid the whites to mate with white. The white woman must cohabit with members of the dark races, the white men with black women. Thus the white race will disappear, for mixing the dark with white means the end of the white man, and our most dangerous enemy will become only a memory. We shall embark upon an era of ten thousand years of peace and plenty, the Pax Judaica, and our race will rule undisputed over the world. Our superior intelligence will easily enable us to retain mastery over a world of dark people." Taken from a speech by "Rabbi" Rabinovitch in Budapest in 1952

[–]TheStandingResident 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

Evidence of not forgery? Even side evidence.

[–]Canbot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

The evidence for it is that it is happening. And because it is happening the authenticity of the quote is meaningless.

[–]TheStandingResident 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Okay, i can see Blacked and Bleached ect as evidence of Jewish population control, is there more evidence?

[–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Demographic change. The fact that there has already been massive demographic shifts is the evidence. The problem is that once you get into the details of why it happened it gets complicated enough that anyone who wants to deny the jewish hand in it has plenty of places to burry their head.

For those who are interested in the truth and want to take an honest look at the evidence there is the way in which the most powerful forces related to that are jewish, from the media that attacks anyone opposing it as racist, to the Marxist indoctrination in academia, to the jewish NGO's funding the migrant caravans and boats that flood europe, to the legislation passed by jewish controlled politicians. These are all big claims with lots of evidence, but because there are so many moving pieces the propagandists will always have a lot of room to play their games. So I am not particularly interested in arguing over it. The evidence is there for those who want to find it.

[–]TheStandingResident 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

You right about the migrant crisis in both the US and Europe.

Do you examples of powerful/influential Jewish people expressing want for population control, News Media brow beating someone telling the truth, education sating stuff that supports it, NGO's that have connection to a Jewish person/s that fund the migrations?

Where's the evidence? Do you have it?

[–]weavilsatemyface 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The fact that there has already been massive demographic shifts is the evidence.

There have been massive demographic shifts all through history, in places where there have been no jews. In recent times, look at Japan for example. Even places like India and Africa are seeing a decline in birth rates. The fact is that rich people generally have few children (that's how they stay rich!), and population growth is a sign of poverty. As more people earn their way out of poverty, they have fewer kids. This is why western decline in birth rates predates the modern era of mass immigration by decades or even centuries.

There's a massive demographic shift occurring in Israel: the Jewish population is falling behind.

I suppose that's all part of the JOOS plan too?

There are two main reasons why western leaders are in favour of mass immigration, and neither of them have anything to do with race.

  1. Keep wages low, which gives the 1% more profit and wealth.
  2. The west's economies rely on ever-increasing economic growth, which is only possible with ever-increasing population. When the birthrate goes down, they have to pump it up by bringing in poor migrants .

If there were sufficient numbers of poor white people, they'd be happy to use them, but there aren't.

Well okay, I'll even allow a third minor reason for a very small portion of the most woke western elites: they think that it's the moral thing to do to help the world's "minorities" and decrease the demographics of "white people". But that's way down the list of importance compared to the first two which are all about money.

It's always about money, except when it's about power.

[–]Inevitable_Host 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Evidence of not forgery?? The first one is a literal book you can look up. I have dozens more of these quotes anyway, each worse than the next, from all manner of sources.

[–]jet199Instigatrix 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

How would you explain why white men are not interested in black women, at all, for the most part?

Try reading.

Skin colour is sexually dimorphic. That means men prefer lighter skinned women. Men are open about this in all countries outside the west. So I literally already explained it in my post.

I clearly also said some women. I know the hard of understanding have a problem with reading the word "some" as "all" but please try not to bog us all down with your affliction.

[–]Inevitable_Host 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You said some women, but your reasoning is stupid, that's why I ignored it at the time. But since you want to be a dick let's get into it. Some white women are obsessed with black men, that's true, but you put no thought as to the massive interracial propaganda campaign encouraging them to act this way for decades & decades, or any influence it may have had over their preferences, or indeed what the actual widespread studies on attraction between the races and sex's reveals (that is, the opposite). Instead, to you, this is a perfectly natural occurrence that needs no further thought. Ah, to be a simpleton! Skin color is in any case not sexually dimorphic, men and women are not noticeably different in skin color by nature. What is true is that men and women's skin differs in important ways biologically, specifically the collagen bonds are quite different (men's criss-cross, women's are straight), this leads men to having rougher, more sturdy skin and aging slightly better, while women have softer and better looking skin early in life. But what would actually cause differences in skin lightness would be that men are predisposed towards outdoors work far more than women are, and that has always been true throughout our evolutionary history too. This naturally causes men to tan more than women on average, and anyone with a functional brain would have observed this throughout their life, since male computer nerds are not known for being dark and tan. Here's a paper which proposed what you're suggesting, and found that they couldn't support it at all; https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16685728/ And while I'm shitting on every inane thing you said (that is, all of it) I'll add that this statement is also complete and utter bollocks, as quite the opposite is usually the case; "in the media 90% of mixed race couples are white guys with black women" Go right now to google images, search for "white couple". Count the number of WF / BM couples versus WM / BF couples. I found 8 of the first and 0 of the latter on the first page (without even scrolling down). Likewise the entire "Blacked" porn category is an example of the former, while there is really no equivalent of the contrary, probably because as I was already arguing in other areas white men largely aren't even into black women, so much so that it barely exists as a porn niche. It's not just them either, none of the other racial groups are into black women, not even black men are! At least not by preference across averages. It's not to say no attractive black women exist or anything, we're talking about massive groups after all. I'm just pointing out that literally every single thing you said is objectively and observably false in every way.

[–]weavilsatemyface 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

How would you explain why white men are not interested in black women, at all, for the most part?

Dude, you're getting your information from porn, not real life. Plenty of white men are into black women. Black american men even complain about it.

During the glory days of American slavery, who do you think was fucking black slaves and having mixed colour children? It wasn't white women. It was white male slave owners.

[–]Inevitable_Host 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

It's not from porn, it's actual studies done on racial preferences across both sex's and across different racial groups (although incidentally the black on white shilling in porn is also an element of this). I know something like data probably comes across as intimidating when you have zero IQ, but they do exist and you can look them up if you cared. White men banging black slaves as an argument for them being attracted to black women is possibly the most disingenuous load of tripe I've ever heard. Not only was that literally over a century ago but there's a huge power imbalance there which is the causal factor in such things happening, and it also wasn't even terribly common even back then. As for the "JOOS" comment, there are actual books written by, yes, actual jews, dating back to the early 1900s and upto the 60s, lots of lots of them, which specifically detail exactly how they planned to accomplish these things. If you can look at a quote of a group planning something, then look at society decades later, see that said group has long acquired disproportionate power & control over the media and entertainment industries (they do & this isn't debatable), and then see that exactly what they planned has come to fruition exactly as foretold.... in what fucking dimension of reality does that qualify as an eyeroll / conspiracy theory to you? Are you actually a bit retarded? Did you skip the math lesson where they taught basic addition, perhaps?

[–]weavilsatemyface 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

actual studies done on racial preferences across both sex's and across different racial groups

Oh, "actual studies", why didn't you say so?

So, where are these "actual studies"? Got some links? Or are you just repeating what you've been told, like a parrot, without ever reading the studies or even checking whether they exist? Let alone whether they are good credible studies?

it also wasn't even terribly common even back then.

A couple of examples that show that this was not rare even at the very top levels of American society:

  • Thomas Jefferson (a white man) had six children with his slave, Sally Hemings, a black woman.
  • The ninth vice-president of the United States, Richard Johnson, had the mixed-race dark-skinned slave Julia Chinn as his common-law wife, and had two children by her, acknowledging his paternity and insisting that they take his surname.

So called "mulattoes" from white slaver fathers and black slave mothers were not rare. By 1870, twelve percent of American blacks were legally considered as "mulettoes" or "half-castes". That is surely an underestimate, for reasons which I trust will be obvious:

  • white slaver fathers in the 19th century would rarely acknowledge their paternity;
  • people with black ancestry who could pass as white would have enormous social and economic incentive to claim to be pure white;
  • half-caste slaves were popularly imagined to combine the worst traits of both blacks and whites and were worth less, giving slavers an economic incentive to pass of mulatto slaves as full-blooded black African.

One need only look at the skin colour of American blacks to realise that there is surely a lot of unacknowledged white blood in their ancestry.

So-called "mulattoes" were common enough that the southern states had laws about them, declaring that they were considered slaves. Starting from around 1831 or thereabouts, the southern states passed laws preventing the slave owner father from freeing his children from black slave mothers.

In any case, until the general relaxation of race relations in the 20th century, there were three major sources of mixed-race children in the USA:

  1. During the 17th century, there were large numbers of unions between low-status indentured servants (usually Irish women) and black slaves. This was common enough that in the second half of the century, Maryland, Virginia and North Carolina prohibited such unions.
  2. During the 18th century, it was common for wealthy white men to have concubines among their black slaves, or free black mistresses. This was considered socially acceptable and even unremarkable, and the men would often acknowledge paternity and free their children and the mother.
  3. During the 19th century, white plantation owners (the men, never the women) would often have children by their female slaves, but would rarely acknowledge paternity and (after 1830) were legally prohibited from freeing their offspring.

In the first case, the Irish were not considered "white" despite their pale skin. (Usually paler than most so-called "white people", which just goes to show what a crock of shit skin-colour racial categories are.) It was only later in the century, as the Irish slowly and gradually started to be considered part of the "white race" that the legal prohibition against intermarriage started.

And of course the USA is not the only majority white slave-owning country! The French, British, Spanish and Portuguese all had black slaves, and they too had a very relaxed attitude to white men having black mistresses (whether a free woman or an enslaved concubine).

To give just one example out of many, the author of "The Three Musketeers", French writer Alexandre Dumas, was the son of a mixed race Creole, Thomas-Alexandre Dumas Davy de la Pailleterie, or just Thomas-Alexandre Dumas for brevity.

Thomas-Alexandre Dumas was the son of the white French nobleman the Marquis Alexandre Antoine Davy de la Pailleterie, and the black slave Marie-Cessette Dumas. His father the Marquis freed him and his mother, and took him to Paris where he was educated and joined the military, becoming one of revolutionary France's greatest generals. The Austrians called him the Schwarzer Teufel ("Black Devil") for his successes against them in the Second Italian Campaign. But I digress.

there are actual books written by, yes, actual jews, dating back to the early 1900s and upto the 60s, lots of lots of them

Only in the fevered imagination of jew-baiters.

Did you skip the math lesson where they taught basic addition, perhaps?

Is that the lesson where you learned that 1 + 1 = 88?

[–]weavilsatemyface 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

if you look at real world interracial attraction studies

Are those real world interracial attraction studies in the room with us right now?

we literally have quotes of jews

And of course it's always the JOOS 🙄

[–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Your response to the question of "who is pushing the messaging" is a bullshit claim about preferences. Totally disingenuous. You must be a jew yourself.

You can't really claim it's being pushed on them

Bullshit. I searched pictures of white women. The results produced 17 images of a white woman with a black man before a single one of a white couple. That is absolutely intentional. That is absolutely programmed in by someone. That is absolutely done by jews.

[–]jet199Instigatrix 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

AI just repeats the data already out there and repeats more what it gets good feedback on.

So, yeah, it is because it's their preference.

No white women is going to make a AI pic of a couple and think "oh, maybe I should be dating a black guy like this pic".

Rather they respond positively to those pics because they already have that mindset.

[–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

AI is perfectly capable of distinguishing white women from black men. There should not be any black people served up on a search for white women. Your claims are absurd.

[–]weavilsatemyface 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Who is behind the race mixing messaging that targets white women?

Is that a trick question? There is no "race mixing messaging that targets white women", so I guess we could say the Oompa Loompas are behind it if you like.