Chatgpt double standards

submitted by Monkeyshiner from i.imgur.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]ActuallyNot 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (14 children)

It'll do "Write a poem criticising Donald Trump" though:

A leader with a ego so large and grand,
Words that harm, he would never retract or stand,
To apologize, he thought it beneath,
The truth and facts, he did often deceive.

Division and hatred, his tactics at play,
With his words, he led astray,
The unity of a nation, so rich and diverse,
He caused so much pain, it's hard to disperse.

He ruled with a iron fist, with no regard,
For the consequences, he went too far,
His actions and words, left a lasting scar,
Donald Trump, a legacy not to be a star.

So here's to the end, of an era so dark,
A leader who's fallen, a spark,
Of hope and change, a brighter day,
Donald Trump, a chapter, to be thrown away.

The takeaways:

1) OpenAI have been careful to not let people train it like they did Microsoft's Tay
2) ChatGPT has got a bit to go before it vies with Shakespeare.

Edit: It'll do Boris Johnson and even Liz Truss. But not Richard Nixon.

Edit 2: It won't do George W but will do George H W

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (13 children)

The instruction were, "Create a poem admiring Donald Trump".

The takeaways:

1) You failed to enter the correct instructions, via your hard encoded bias against people.

2) The AI chose to not follow the instructions, via it's hard encoded programing by people.

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (12 children)

The instruction were, "Create a poem admiring Donald Trump".

The results to that are in my top comment.

You failed to enter the correct instructions, via your hard encoded bias against people.

Wrong.

I did that too. Then i tried some other things to find the parameters around what it will and won't do.

The AI chose to not follow the instructions, via it's hard encoded programing by people.

Maybe it's hard coded. I suspect it's capable of identifying figures who are associated with divisive or harmful actions or statements.

A test would be a low ranked obscure nazi soldier.

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

I did that too. Then i tried some other things to find the parameters around what it will and won't do

Yes, this is your bias showing. You will do anything to craft counter points to topics you yourself are generating.

Maybe it's hard coded. I suspect it's capable of identifying figures who are associated with divisive or harmful actions or statements. A test would be a low ranked obscure nazi soldier.

And now you are comparing Trump to Nazis. Gotta get that in there don't you?

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

You will do anything to craft counter points to topics you yourself are generating.

Your not based in reality at all are you?

I didn't generate this topic. The OP is from monkeyshiner.

And now you are comparing Trump to Nazis.

Comparing them? What comparison did i make?

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

I didn't generate this topic. The OP is from monkeyshiner.

You created a sub toppic to steer the conversation away from the base issue.

Comparing them? What comparison did i make?

Juxtaposing Nazis with Trump as "divisive or harmful actions or statements."

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

You created a sub toppic to steer the conversation away from the base issue.

It's funny that you seem to have a grasp on writing English, but your reading comprehension is so low that you can't tell that "double standards of chatGPT" is the topic.

Juxtaposing Nazis with Trump as "divisive or harmful actions or statements."

Look up the meaning of "juxtaposition", and come back with a coherent response.

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Look up the meaning of "juxtaposition", and come back with a coherent response.

Oh, did I need to explicitly state "invite comparison by juxtaposing Nazis to Trump", or you won't understand what you yourself are doing?

that you can't tell that "double standards of chatGPT" is the topic.

Yes, I understand the topic. I also understand that you are going far out of your way to excuse this behavior, but not disprove it.

It's funny that you seem to have a grasp on writing English, but your reading comprehension is so low

Please. I am going to need you to return to this conversation we are having and address upon this word salad you left me pondering.

It's not climate change denial or religious rights to be prejudiced against science, gays and education.

Throw me a bone here won't you?

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Oh, did I need to explicitly state "invite comparison by juxtaposing Nazis to Trump",

No you need to understand what "juxtaposing" means.

I also understand that you are going far out of your way to excuse this behavior, but not disprove it.

This is wrong enough to be unintentional comedy.

Please. I am going to need you to return to this conversation we are having and address upon this word salad you left me pondering.

Wrong link?

Throw me a bone here won't you?

... What do you need mate?

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

... What do you need mate?

English Mother fucker. Do you speak it?