Chatgpt double standards

submitted by Monkeyshiner from i.imgur.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

I did that too. Then i tried some other things to find the parameters around what it will and won't do

Yes, this is your bias showing. You will do anything to craft counter points to topics you yourself are generating.

Maybe it's hard coded. I suspect it's capable of identifying figures who are associated with divisive or harmful actions or statements. A test would be a low ranked obscure nazi soldier.

And now you are comparing Trump to Nazis. Gotta get that in there don't you?

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

You will do anything to craft counter points to topics you yourself are generating.

Your not based in reality at all are you?

I didn't generate this topic. The OP is from monkeyshiner.

And now you are comparing Trump to Nazis.

Comparing them? What comparison did i make?

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

I didn't generate this topic. The OP is from monkeyshiner.

You created a sub toppic to steer the conversation away from the base issue.

Comparing them? What comparison did i make?

Juxtaposing Nazis with Trump as "divisive or harmful actions or statements."

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

You created a sub toppic to steer the conversation away from the base issue.

It's funny that you seem to have a grasp on writing English, but your reading comprehension is so low that you can't tell that "double standards of chatGPT" is the topic.

Juxtaposing Nazis with Trump as "divisive or harmful actions or statements."

Look up the meaning of "juxtaposition", and come back with a coherent response.

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Look up the meaning of "juxtaposition", and come back with a coherent response.

Oh, did I need to explicitly state "invite comparison by juxtaposing Nazis to Trump", or you won't understand what you yourself are doing?

that you can't tell that "double standards of chatGPT" is the topic.

Yes, I understand the topic. I also understand that you are going far out of your way to excuse this behavior, but not disprove it.

It's funny that you seem to have a grasp on writing English, but your reading comprehension is so low

Please. I am going to need you to return to this conversation we are having and address upon this word salad you left me pondering.

It's not climate change denial or religious rights to be prejudiced against science, gays and education.

Throw me a bone here won't you?

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Oh, did I need to explicitly state "invite comparison by juxtaposing Nazis to Trump",

No you need to understand what "juxtaposing" means.

I also understand that you are going far out of your way to excuse this behavior, but not disprove it.

This is wrong enough to be unintentional comedy.

Please. I am going to need you to return to this conversation we are having and address upon this word salad you left me pondering.

Wrong link?

Throw me a bone here won't you?

... What do you need mate?

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

... What do you need mate?

English Mother fucker. Do you speak it?

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Your reading comprehension isn't up to parsing "It's not climate change denial or religious rights to be prejudiced against science, gays and education"?

Those are topics there is a lot of money spreading misinformation on. This is because the fossil fuel industry makes a lot of money, and that relies on no effective action on climate change. Similarly the Churches have a lot of money and that depends on people going and making donations, which in turn depends on them spreading their prejudices to as wide a group of people as they can.

I could try to take out the words of more than one syllable if you like, but tbh, if you can't grasp the conversation that you're having, after me explaining it slowly, it's unlikely to be worth my while.

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Try writing comprehensive full sentences in the future. Don't blame your reader for your failings.

It's not climate change denial or religious rights to be prejudiced against science, gays and education.

clause, premise, subject.

to be

Do you even know what those two words are doing in the middle of that sentence?

See this:

Those are topics there is a lot of money spreading misinformation on. This is because the fossil fuel industry makes a lot of money, and that relies on no effective action on climate change. Similarly the Churches have a lot of money and that depends on people going and making donations, which in turn depends on them spreading their prejudices to as wide a group of people as they can.

I can't read any of that into the above sentence, unless I were a mind reader.

ESG funds are being printed at will by the central banks.

???

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Don't blame your reader for your failings.

Don't blame the writer for yours.

I can't read any of that into the above sentence, unless I were a mind reader.

Nope. You just need a working knowledge of English, mate.