all 55 comments

[–]ReSegreto 13 insightful - 6 fun13 insightful - 5 fun14 insightful - 6 fun -  (1 child)

🤡 🌎

[–]wristaction 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

The only cogent response.

[–]djhdlkguhaeil 9 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

Grab a beer gays, we on the right stopped caring.

[–]madcow-5 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Also, most of the people who helped you guys be able to get married are on the right now.

Think these SJWs frantically competing to look the most progressive were on your side in 2000? Nah, they were the ones taking the homophobia, the norm of the time, too far and chucking rocks at you.

[–][deleted]  (1 child)

[removed]

    [–]madcow-5 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    There’re tons in their 30’s.

    [–]Not_a_celebrity 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

    How come every right wing I see here on the internet (even in the comments below people are like "as bad as an all woman team is it would be worse to allow anyone gay", "gays are eww", etc) or anywhere is a homophobe then?

    [–]madcow-5 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    Because you have a straw man idea of what a right winger is.

    [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Perhaps the answer is apparent when one sees the number of evangelical Republicans who've been caught with their boyfriends or child porn. They have to support the party line that "gays" are bad, and might even believe this, but the most outspoken of this group are men, and they probably wonder why they dream of sex with men. Outside of the church, and before Freud, (for thousands of years), bisexuality and other forms of sexuality were not so heavily criticized, even for those who were against it.

    [–][deleted] 7 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 3 fun -  (5 children)

    I find it suspicious that it's all-female and they reject a male.

    [–]ReeferMadness 11 insightful - 3 fun11 insightful - 2 fun12 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

    And have the audacity to say it's for diversity. This is the definition of double speak.

    [–]insta 10 insightful - 2 fun10 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

    The Apple department head of diversity had to step down after she said that white men can be diverse.

    If people haven't caught onto what "diversity" means by now their either idiots or liars.

    [–]jet199 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

    I don't. I find it obvious.

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    Different words, same meaning.

    [–][deleted]  (1 child)

    [deleted]

      [–]Airbus320 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

      🤣

      [–]dissidentrhetoric 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

      feminism is the hate of white men

      [–]akkordeonplayer 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      Lol.

      [–]madcow-5 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (17 children)

      I don't entirely buy into the whole "women causing the decline of society" bullshit, but I did get thinking the other day: the left is entirely dominated by women. Short of Schumer, the higher up men on the left don't seem influential.

      [–]scrubking[S] 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

      Women are not the cause for the decline of society. Women being placed in positions of authority is one of the causes of the decline of society.

      [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

      Any evidence for that? (no)

      [–]Airbus320 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

      Merkel

      [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      Nah - Germany is the 4th richest economy. She's doing something right.

      Perhaps: Imelda Marcos

      [–]insta 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

      [–][deleted] 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

      It's not like Republicans are gonna save us, though.

      [–]insta 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

      True, but it's not like they're out there voting for staunch libertarians either.

      [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

      Ridiculous map. What is the source? That's not how demographic results would look, by a long shot.

      [–]insta 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

      When people are so disconnected from the reality of demographics and voting that they just kneejerk reject them for no reason.

      [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

      I mentioned the reason. I asked you for the source. Disinformation is spread with images like this, that as you note are "disconnectd from the realilty of demographics". For example, 'College Educated Whites' would not turn that many states Red. It is impossible. And the majority of them are not nearly that stupid.

      [–]insta 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      I asked you for the source.

      There is no minority female group that votes in majority for Republicans. We both know that, you're just lying about it. And even white females are only a plurality by just +/- 2-4%.

      For example, 'College Educated Whites' would not turn that many states Red.

      I'll be honest, looking at that again you might be right.

      [–]jet199 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

      In the UK it's mostly leftist men driving this. There's a whole bro movement around Corbyn which is just old school bully boys throwing their weight around with a woke sheen. A couple of years ago a Labour politician was talking and one of these progressive men just picked her up and removed her from the platform. This is why women actually need some sort of respected hierarchy in society otherwise all you're left with is who's the strongest, where women will always lose.

      [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

      Women Democrats at the moment are much more brave than their male counterparts at the moment, which makes the men look weak. There is however, Adam Schiff, who is doing his job. Republican congressmen are quite outspoken, and sometimes promise their constituents the opposite of what they vote for in congress; eg. Rubio, Paul, McConnell, etc. Republican congresswomen - lately - seem unhinged when they support QAnon theories.

      [–]madcow-5 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      I don’t pay close attention to Adam Schoff, but of the little I’ve seen of him, he’s like the poster boy for a weak male.

      [–][deleted]  (1 child)

      [removed]

        [–]madcow-5 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        Who do you see doing that?

        [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 4 fun2 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

        this is good actually, as bad as an all woman team is it would be worse to allow anyone gay

        [–]blowininthewind 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

        define the word diversity.

        also define the word cultural revolution.

        [–]Nonime 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

        The USA does not have equal demographics. Demanding an even split of every skin color in the USA is idiotic and un-representative. The most "reasonable" diversity position is to have the council match actual USA demographics, meaning 62% white, 16.9% Hispanic, 12.6% black, and 5.2% Asian.

        That council is not white or Asian enough.

        [–]jamesK_3rd 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        If we're doing real diversity, then it should probably better match the demographics of the city:

        San Francisco Demographics

        According to the most recent ACS, the racial composition of San Francisco was: - White: 46.41% - Asian: 34.40% - Other race: 7.68% - Two or more races: 5.57% - Black or African American: 5.21% - Native American: 0.37%- - Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander:0.36%

        Additionally: - gay or lesbian: 15.6% - 49% female

        If they want real diversity, they're going to need to fire half of the women in the council. They probably only need two homosexuals.

        So really, they need: - 7 whites - 5 Asians - 1 black - 1 Hispanic - 1 other

        Of course only half should be women.

        The two homosexuals are probably White or Asian there, so if probably just select one homo in each of those two brackets. But they could make one of them from another bracket for fun. Of course if they want more homosexuals they could always pack the board.............

        Why is it only a 15 person council rather than a 150 person council....

        [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

        Breitbart cancer

        [–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

        Search: Breitbart and Netanyahu/Mossad.

        It should basically be put into foreign agent status just like AIPAC and the American Zionist council/organization should be.

        We know that the ZioCons are playing the hero card creating the needed clown world for their sheep to be distracted with.

        I have a post where I proved that an Israeli citizen and Zionist literally pretented to be gay lesbian and that she and her lover were attacked a a hoard of white teenages that left her nose broken and bleeding because she was gay. This occures in the UK. It was a big news story and the photo ops were perfect.

        As a sleuth I was able to prove this zionist was out on her levitical vaction year and she wasn't a lesbian, had a boyfriend and she was hired by a Perception management company to push this story.

        It was entirely a hoax. A psyop. A fake story. So, Zionists are creating many of these stories to rile us up and distract us with. How many posts on the front page of saidit mention bankers?

        [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

        Perhaps?: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-48555889

        Stories like this are - I agree - worth questioning, because the MSM will post anything: if it bleeds, it leads. And there are special interest groups (in several countries) that fund these violent events and stories in order to create anxiety and distractions. It's reality TV on News at 10.

        [–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        That's the one... even the BBC title is ridiculous. It's stupid. She got some money from this hack act job psyop.

        https://www.saidit.net/s/WorldNews/comments/1vh1/men_are_badgay_is_good_expse_on_a_hate_crime_hoax/

        [–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        Even more idiotic narrative:

        Two actors starring in an award-winning LGBT+ play were pelted with stones in a “cowardly, homophobic hate crime” after kissing in the street.

        [–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

        It's funny that we agree on so much. I invite you to look up corey morningstar and read some of her amazing research. Notice it is never posted here.

        https://mobile.twitter.com/elleprovocateur

        Sure there are some commies on her page but that is the nature of the game. They feature the hammer and sickle but forget that the USSR and all communist countries were in fact CORPORATIONS.

        [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

        Seems odd to do investigative journalism via tweet - as if one were a gnat in heat and had difficulty writing longer discourses. I've read through a number of her Tweets about farmers in India, and - because of the word limit perhaps - it's not easy to appreciate most of her points, which mainly suggest criticism, rather than get to the point. Hopefully this person will move to a better platform and start to make more explicit arguments. Thanks for the info. Increasing attendion for the farmers' protests is important, and does not necessarily require all of the critical assessment this person promotes. India's government removed farmers' abiilities to arrange their own prices for their own crops, and thus to operate in the marked. Taking away their rights in September was criminal, and shows how the government arranged a corporate takeover of farmers' work. They should get more attention for this.

        [–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        She has her own website and has written many articles. She covers many topics.

        [–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        This proves Brietbart are playing the heroes in this clown world psyop. Let's trust a media corporation that was created by mossad agents.

        [–]worthyword 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        It's really telling, I think, that we only ever hear stories like this from British right-leaning magazines or beyond sus publications like Breitbart. No gay or "LGBTQ+" publication today would touch this topic, either because they're terrified of being labelled as the voice of "privileged white cis gays" or because their editorial teams are now populated by radical trans and "queer" activists.

        [–]akkordeonplayer 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        If it’s an all female group, keep it all female. Men can have their groups.

        You KNOW this “all female” group will be overrun with transwomen in a years’ time anyway.