Saidit admin caves into pressure and finds excuse to ban unpopular saiditor

submitted by trident765 from saidit.net

all 91 comments
sorted by:
new (suggested)
topinsightfulfun

[–]jet199 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

OK, I get what you guys are doing.

Distraction.

Keep the deplorables busy so no one plots anything against the hair sniffer.

We weren't doing that anyway but you guys entertain yourselves.

It's not like there's anytime interesting happening in the news right now or anything.

[–]bobbobbybob 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (12 children)

rule 2: no sexualising of children.

Pretty cut and dried

[–]SilenceThem_Consume 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

“Not merely the validity of experience, but the very existence of external reality was tacitly denied by their philosophy. The heresy of heresies was common sense.”

[–]bobbobbybob 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

didn't you just get banned? peddle your pedo crap elsewhere

[–]Airbus320 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (5 children)

What about the rotten fruit poem in saidit?

[–][deleted]  (4 children)

[deleted]

    [–]Airbus320 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (2 children)

    s/poetry

    [–][deleted]  (1 child)

    [deleted]

      [–]Airbus320 4 insightful - 5 fun4 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

      Lets censor it quick

      [–]trident765[S] 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (3 children)

      Pretty cut and dried

      What does "sexualize" mean?

      [–]jet199 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

      To make something sexual which isn't.

      [–]trident765[S] 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

      What does it mean to make something sexual?

      [–]jet199 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

      Don't play cute.

      You're a perv, you know full well.

      [–]Optimus85 12 insightful - 3 fun12 insightful - 2 fun13 insightful - 3 fun -  (12 children)

      It's the kind of shit the authorities will use as an excuse to shut down this site. So fuck off with your defending molesting children and killing feminists. Go sabotage some other platform.

      [–]SilenceThem_Consume 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      Can you give examples of speech being illegal?

      [–]magnora7 7 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

      Agreed

      [–]fschmidt 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (9 children)

      We are defending free speech, not molesting children and killing feminists.

      This site will be shut down anyway because it isn't decentralized and the new government will shut down all right-leaning sites that it can.

      [–]filbs111 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

      They'll come for anything not enthusiastically on board the new one party system. Of course, it will be branded as something else.

      [–]bobbobbybob 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

      no, we are not "defending free speech". we are hanging out and talking to each other without applying the mad censorship of the current cancel culture whilst abiding by simple site rules

      faggot

      [–]fschmidt 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (2 children)

      "We" doesn't include you. "We" refers to the regular members of this sub.

      moron

      [–]Airbus320 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

      He is a mod of s/retards

      [–]Optimus85 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

      There are commies. socialists, capitalists and libertarians on this site you know. "Right" and "left' are pretty reductionist concepts. Politics and values are a spectrum.

      [–]fschmidt 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

      Basically anyone against the globalists will be shut down.

      [–]jet199 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

      So not paedos then.

      [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

      yeah I'm far left socialist and I'm looking at repubs complaining about being banned and thinking "first time?"

      [–][deleted] 8 insightful - 6 fun8 insightful - 5 fun9 insightful - 6 fun -  (0 children)

      https://i.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/mobile/000/035/766/0_U6GcU-Xk7GEWMoQR.jpg

      [–][deleted] 9 insightful - 4 fun9 insightful - 3 fun10 insightful - 4 fun -  (36 children)

      The guy is unpopular because he wants to fuck his own daughter when she turns 12, and he has he has a date with a 15yr old coming up.

      Not like he got banned for liking butterscotch ice cream.

      [–]SilenceThem_Consume 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

      Great post, I think you should ban everyone who you think is trolling, then we can get only the "REAL" adults here.

      [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

      I had nothing to do with it.

      [–]fschmidt 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (32 children)

      You are a moron. You are in the wrong sub.

      [–]Optimus85 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun -  (7 children)

      You're on the wrong site.

      [–]fschmidt 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (6 children)

      I am in the wrong time, but I don't have a time machine. So I am stuck in idiocracy.

      [–]jet199 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

      You long for a simpler time when men were men and little girls were traded like cattle.

      [–]Airbus320 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

      Whats wrong with that? Atleast we didn't have the tranny problem then

      [–]bobbobbybob 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

      hot tip: you can fuck off somewhere else and push your crap there instead

      [–]fschmidt 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

      Actually I can't because humanity has become too stupid to understand what I am saying, and too intolerant to even listen to many things.

      [–]Optimus85 4 insightful - 5 fun4 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 5 fun -  (1 child)

      Have some Brawndo. It's got electrolytes.

      [–]fschmidt 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

      I will leave that to Americans to water their crops. Instead I will probably move to Costa Rica and drink fresh fruit drinks that one can hardly find in America.

      [–][deleted] 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (23 children)

      Don't take it out on me. I said not to ban your friend before he started talking about raping children. What did he think was going to happen?

      [–]SilenceThem_Consume 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

      I said not to ban... What did he think was going to happen?

      I just had sexual relations with Joe Biden, and i didnt ask him first. #Did it Happen? Just Speech Thiings.

      🦅

      [–]fschmidt 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (21 children)

      I don't know your age, but not so long ago there was free speech in America and people were not banned for holding unpopular opinions. Only in about the last 10 years has the West become universally against free speech.

      [–]Node 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

      Before the jews fomented the "free speech riots" at Berkeley in the 60s, our speech was free while still not corrupting the community. They successfully turned Free Speech into a weapon to destroy our morals and our country.

      [–][deleted]  (3 children)

      [deleted]

        [–]fschmidt 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun -  (2 children)

        Not my tribe, rabbi. I left the Jewish tribe.

        [–][deleted]  (1 child)

        [deleted]

          [–]fschmidt 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

          I protect all free speech. I even protect the free speech of racist Nazis. Superficially this may not appear to be in my self interest but I believe that free speech is fundamentally in my interest, so I defend the right of free speech for all views.

          [–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (15 children)

          That's true, although Roman Polanski was charged in 1977. NAMBLA, despised widely, was founded in 78. Society has become more puritanical in many ways since, but some things were always frowned upon.

          [–]Airbus320 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

          Children was not one of them

          [–]fschmidt 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun -  (13 children)

          Just because things were frowned upon didn't mean that they couldn't be discussed. These days the only public place where I can speak freely in America is in a mosque.

          [–][deleted] 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (12 children)

          Many of us, and even some animals, have a protective instinct towards children even if they aren't ours. It's primal. Talking about hurting them triggers that part of the lizard brain.

          [–]SilenceThem_Consume 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

          (Visual approxximation of the outraged posters above who are calling for censorship Irl)

          [–]fschmidt 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (10 children)

          Those with more than lizard brains understand that free speech is the best way to deal with all issues, especially with opinions that one disagrees with. I am a strict religious conservative (following the Old Testament), so obviously I disagree with Caamib's views on sex. But that doesn't prevent me from defending his right to speak.

          [–]bobbobbybob 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

          the site has rules. Rule 2 is pretty clear.

          [–]fschmidt 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

          Rule 2 is irrelevant because porn wasn't posted.

          [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

          Do you have kids yet? I feel like you might feel differently if it was your child or could possibly be your child that Caamib wanted to use like a sex toy.

          [–]fschmidt 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (5 children)

          Yes I have kids.

          [–]magnora7 8 insightful - 4 fun8 insightful - 3 fun9 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

          Also he literally was saying "Let's mass murder people" so obviously not okay

          [–]fschmidt 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun -  (15 children)

          The admin didn't cave to pressure. The admin is simply modern scum acting like modern scum.

          [–]fschmidt 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (13 children)

          https://saidit.net/s/SaidIt/comments/77i5/saidit_will_die_like_voat_an_incel_vouching_for/rak0

          Proving my point

          [–]magnora7 9 insightful - 4 fun9 insightful - 3 fun10 insightful - 4 fun -  (12 children)

          Don't "Cheer for people to be sent to gulags" then and wish suffering on them?

          Don't be friends with people who openly advocate mass murder?

          Are these complicated concepts for you?

          [–]SilenceThem_Consume 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

          “There was truth and there was untruth, and if you clung to the truth even against the whole world, you were not mad.”

          [–]fschmidt 6 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 4 fun -  (10 children)

          I am not going to submit to you. If you want to arbitrarily ban people that you don't like, then go ahead and ban me. It's your site.

          [–]magnora7 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (9 children)

          I only ban people who break the rules. So if you break rules again you'll be banned and if you don't, you won't be banned. Simple as that. I don't play favorites.

          [–]Airbus320 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

          You do with socks, bookmobile and many others

          [–]fschmidt 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun -  (7 children)

          Simply not true, but debate is obviously pointless.

          [–]bobbobbybob 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

          actually, fuckhead, it is true. Until you break the site rules, the rest of us will have to put up with your nonsense, or block you. Magnora7 is very fair. I'm still here, after all. Although My head is pulled in since it took me time to acclimatise to the rules and general concept of the site.

          [–]SilenceThem_Consume 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

          actually, fuckhead

          🙃🙃🙃

          [–]bobbobbybob 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

          flavour text

          [–]fschmidt 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun -  (3 children)

          You are in the wrong sub. You are just too stupid to understand this.

          [–]bobbobbybob 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

          whatever, giant brain :D

          [–]Airbus320 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

          Go back to s/retards

          [–]magnora7 8 insightful - 5 fun8 insightful - 4 fun9 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

          Yes I won't let people go around literally calling for mass murder. What "modern scum" I am. /s

          [–]magnora7 11 insightful - 4 fun11 insightful - 3 fun12 insightful - 4 fun -  (16 children)

          You mean I applied the rules we've had for years? https://saidit.net/s/SaidIt/comments/j1/the_saiditnet_terms_and_content_policy/

          He was openly advocating mass murder. As well as sexualizing children in several posts, which is also against saidit rules. He literally said:

          I'm a reactionary who supports patriarchy and mass murder of feminist scum.

          Pretty obvious valid ban, as per long-established saidit rules.

          [–]SilenceThem_Consume 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

          the whole aim of Newspeak is to narrow the range of thought... In the end we shall make thoughtcrime literally impossible

          [–]trident765[S] 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

          You are taking the quote out of context. Out of context, it looks like he is calling for violence. In context, it is clear he is just defending himself from accusations that he is a liberal.

          [–]magnora7 9 insightful - 4 fun9 insightful - 3 fun10 insightful - 4 fun -  (3 children)

          There is no context that makes advocating mass murder acceptable on saidit.

          [–]bobbobbybob 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

          Thank you, magnora7.

          Those of us who came form darker places just have to get used to it, as casual demands for genocide were the cultural norm there. Its actually quite refreshing to not be talking like that anymore

          [–]magnora7 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

          Happy to hear it. I agree it's nice to have a place that isn't taken over by stuff like that

          [–]SilenceThem_Consume 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

          Like on reddit? Where they ban women for offending Trans men? Or like on Voat....

          ...

          What website are you talking about?

          [–]trident765[S] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (9 children)

          You are taking the quote out of context. Out of context, it looks like he is calling for violence. In context, it is clear he is just defending himself from accusations that he is a liberal.

          [–]Node 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

          Maybe if it was just that one point needing an explanation and reframing. But then there was that bit with his mom, and the 11 or 12 year olds, and the 'interest' in his own daughter. When the technical line crossings begin stacking up, it kind of starts looking like a pattern.

          [–]SilenceThem_Consume 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

          if it was just that one point needing an explanation and reframing. But then there was

          It's very entertaining how soon the former redditors become envious of censorship. Trolling is not illegal, yet, dumfarse.

          [–]Node 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

          Okay, how soon?

          [–]SilenceThem_Consume 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

          Once you stop asking for it, Jimmy.

          [–]Node 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

          how soon the former redditors become envious of censorship.

          Ah, should have specified. Now I see that last sentence probably seemed what I replied to. How soon for this quote?

          [–]Airbus320 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

          Meh

          [–]Node 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

          Yeah, I felt the same way. Thought about going and grabbing quotes in support, but it was some ridiculously late time of the morning. Hence, a pretty weak comment.

          [–]bobbobbybob 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

          'clear'

          [–]SilenceThem_Consume 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

          '...'