you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]magnora7 11 insightful - 4 fun11 insightful - 3 fun12 insightful - 4 fun -  (16 children)

You mean I applied the rules we've had for years? https://saidit.net/s/SaidIt/comments/j1/the_saiditnet_terms_and_content_policy/

He was openly advocating mass murder. As well as sexualizing children in several posts, which is also against saidit rules. He literally said:

I'm a reactionary who supports patriarchy and mass murder of feminist scum.

Pretty obvious valid ban, as per long-established saidit rules.

[–]SilenceThem_Consume 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

the whole aim of Newspeak is to narrow the range of thought... In the end we shall make thoughtcrime literally impossible

[–]trident765[S] 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

You are taking the quote out of context. Out of context, it looks like he is calling for violence. In context, it is clear he is just defending himself from accusations that he is a liberal.

[–]magnora7 9 insightful - 4 fun9 insightful - 3 fun10 insightful - 4 fun -  (3 children)

There is no context that makes advocating mass murder acceptable on saidit.

[–]bobbobbybob 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Thank you, magnora7.

Those of us who came form darker places just have to get used to it, as casual demands for genocide were the cultural norm there. Its actually quite refreshing to not be talking like that anymore

[–]magnora7 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

Happy to hear it. I agree it's nice to have a place that isn't taken over by stuff like that

[–]SilenceThem_Consume 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Like on reddit? Where they ban women for offending Trans men? Or like on Voat....

...

What website are you talking about?

[–]trident765[S] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (9 children)

You are taking the quote out of context. Out of context, it looks like he is calling for violence. In context, it is clear he is just defending himself from accusations that he is a liberal.

[–]Node 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

Maybe if it was just that one point needing an explanation and reframing. But then there was that bit with his mom, and the 11 or 12 year olds, and the 'interest' in his own daughter. When the technical line crossings begin stacking up, it kind of starts looking like a pattern.

[–]SilenceThem_Consume 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

if it was just that one point needing an explanation and reframing. But then there was

It's very entertaining how soon the former redditors become envious of censorship. Trolling is not illegal, yet, dumfarse.

[–]Node 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Okay, how soon?

[–]SilenceThem_Consume 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Once you stop asking for it, Jimmy.

[–]Node 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

how soon the former redditors become envious of censorship.

Ah, should have specified. Now I see that last sentence probably seemed what I replied to. How soon for this quote?

[–]Airbus320 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

Meh

[–]Node 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah, I felt the same way. Thought about going and grabbing quotes in support, but it was some ridiculously late time of the morning. Hence, a pretty weak comment.

[–]bobbobbybob 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

'clear'

[–]SilenceThem_Consume 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

'...'