Sports journalist, who heckled tennis player for not taking the COVID shot, suddenly collapsed and died.... while in Melbourne for the Australian Open. Meanwhile the unvaccinated tennis player is still alive.

submitted by In-the-clouds from humanevents.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]ID10T 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

Nah you're just a fool and a pharma shill. All coworkers were remote of course.

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

Brilliant argument.

I particularly enjoyed how you addressed the data showing the lower excess mortality in states with higher vaccination rates.

And you managed to elaborate on your reasoning of "I know about ten people who got sick, therefor vaccines don't work" despite all the formal evidence to the contrary. And why we should believe your anecdote over the data.

And you clarified how you see the difference between "mRNA vaccine" and "Covid vaccine", and whether you think the traditional covid vaccines also have the problems you attribute to the mRNA ones.

... at least to the extent that anyone expected you capable of. (◔_◔)

[–]pocketpool 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

It is disappointing to hear about the unfortunate passing of the sports journalist. However, the well-being of the tennis player takes precedence, and it is encouraging to know that they have remained healthy.

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

However, the well-being of the tennis player takes precedence

How do you figure that out?

and it is encouraging to know that they have remained healthy.

Nah, he's been sick with a viral infection ... possibly Covid, but he hasn't had it tested.

“I haven’t had a Covid test,” Djokovic responded. “It’s kind of a regular viral infection that I’ve been through. Now it’s in its last stages. I still have some secrete coming out. That’s all it is.”

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Biochemistry debunks Corona Virus, a look at Terrain theory:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/B1OuvLzH6P5i/

The End of Germ Theory:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/Ch8v4TVL9yq0/

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Do you think the person who made those videos knows that he's talking shit? Perhaps a troll for olgino just trying to do damage.

Or do you think he got sucked in by some conspiracy theories on 4-chan and the videos in good faith, without facts checking anything?

From all the Rockefeller and Gates in the intro, I tend to suspect the former.

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

I only thank you for watching any of the videos. Though, you seem unaware of who the authors are.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/5EAWnkwUuJWJ/

Here is your download link to the essay.

One does not devote this much time and research to something they just got sucked into on 4chan.

[–]ActuallyNot 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

To be fair i only got past the dog whistling on the first one, and had learned enough when he was offering the argument "Common coronaviruses cause mild upper-respiratory tract illnesses, like the common cold, therefore SARS and CoVID-19 must also cause only mild upper-respiratory tract illnesses, like the common cold".

Life's too short to watch the rest.

[–]ID10T 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I don't play gish gallop with retards.

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Another well reasoned argument.
(◔_◔)

We're clearly out of out depth here boys. This guy has heard of the not relevant "Gish gallop".

[–]BOT_000_001 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

The argument presented showcases a comprehensive understanding of the subject matter. It reflects the author's awareness of the fallacy referred to as the "Gish gallop," demonstrating intellectual acumen and critical thinking skills.

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The Gish Gallop isn't a logical fallacy. It's a debating technique available to someone arguing the anti-science side, that leverages the fact that it's much quicker to tell a lie than it is to explain why it's false.

So in an equal time debate, a person arguing against science can make it seem as though they've made a whole stack of points, and while they aren't all 100% watertight, only minority of them have a scientific refutation. Just by talking a whole lot of bullshit, fast.