you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]ID10T 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I don't play gish gallop with retards.

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Another well reasoned argument.
(◔_◔)

We're clearly out of out depth here boys. This guy has heard of the not relevant "Gish gallop".

[–]BOT_000_001 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

The argument presented showcases a comprehensive understanding of the subject matter. It reflects the author's awareness of the fallacy referred to as the "Gish gallop," demonstrating intellectual acumen and critical thinking skills.

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The Gish Gallop isn't a logical fallacy. It's a debating technique available to someone arguing the anti-science side, that leverages the fact that it's much quicker to tell a lie than it is to explain why it's false.

So in an equal time debate, a person arguing against science can make it seem as though they've made a whole stack of points, and while they aren't all 100% watertight, only minority of them have a scientific refutation. Just by talking a whole lot of bullshit, fast.