you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

Yes. You have contrasted these two men, in this thread and then assigned a narrative to it.

ڵ

Good for you! Also, a little lazy... But good for you none the less.

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

The article I linked assigns the narrative.

But you seem to have some objection to it. However it's not one that you can put into words.

Good for you! Also, a little lazy... But good for you none the less.

Oh, the irony.

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

No it doesn't. As you have contrasted the black man against the white. But you already knew that. As you are a liar.

Never Forget!

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

No it doesn't. As you have contrasted the black man against the white.

Yes it does:

The cases are remarkably similar, except for one thing: Guy is black, Magee white. And while Magee was found to have acted in self-defense, prosecutors are seeking the death penalty for Guy. He remains in jail while he awaits trial.

.

But you already knew that. As you are a liar.

Oh, the irony.

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Oh sorry. I clicked the link above the link you posted the last time I went to check on it. Not that it matters, as you chose to drag that motherjones article into this thread.

So, you still did that. Do you agree?

940

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Oh sorry.

Sure.

I clicked the link above the link you posted the last time I went to check on it.

Did you? What link was that?

Not that it matters

Then why bring it up?

as you chose to drag that motherjones article into this thread.

Yes, the source I linked to was "that motherjones" article. In the sense that it was a motherjones article.

Well done. You managed to follow the link.

Why do you claim that it doesn't matter?

So, you still did that. Do you agree?

Linked to a source that backed up what I was saying?

Yes, I did do that. I often do that. One could say it's my MO.

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Did you? What link was that?

The link above it.

Then why bring it up?

You did that.

Why do you claim that it doesn't matter?

That is explained in the second half of the sentence that you chose to quote separately.

Linked to a source that backed up what I was saying?

No, that's not what I was implying at all. Why do you do that?

⅋̸͎͋̂ ̴̪̦͗͗˙̵͙̈̀ ̷̙̆ ̷̢̙̓̓¿̸̜͔͊̏ ̴̤͋̊ ̸͖̆͠¡̷̗̚͝