you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (10 children)

Yes. That is the Biden Crime Family policy. But, the topic is Trump.

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

It's possible that someone who hasn't been following the investigations might believe that.

But you're just lying aren't you.

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

the investigations

You mean, these ones?

https://oversight.house.gov/landing/biden-family-investigation/

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Yep. Not a single charge filed. Not a single scrap of evidence sufficient for court. A bunch of poorly sourced allegations continually referred to as if they're talking points. Mostly from one unnamed human source that everyone knows was Rudy Giuliani. https://ohiocapitaljournal.com/2023/10/02/gop-witnesses-at-biden-impeachment-hearing-see-insufficient-evidence-of-wrongdoing-so-far/

Witnesses turned out to be crooks and liars. https://newrepublic.com/article/178960/republican-witness-hunter-biden-impeachment-tony-bobulinski-past

Counter to DOJ policy on unproven allegations.

As we both know, don't we.

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

Wow. That whole one witness you say? While all of D.C is corrupt, laundering money through Ukraine, and running a front for China, you found one guy that's shady. Well you got me there.

As we both know, don't we?

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Wow. That whole one witness you say?

For instance. None of the others panned out either, as you will remember.

While all of D.C is corrupt,

Citation needed.

laundering money through Ukraine

Citation needed.

and running a front for China,

Citation needed.

you found one guy that's shady.

One example.

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

You do not live in the real world.

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

You've made 3 claims that need citation.

Trying to reduce the discussion to insults doesn't support your claims.

Am I to assume that you're withdrawing your claims because they have no evidence?

Good

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

And your only goal is endless """engagement""". Am I too assume that you are paid to crawl around in the mud, making the internet suck? You try to reduce every discussion to an endless array of meaningless citations that are barley related to the topics at hand. Do you not see how transparent this is? You are no better than the bots spamming walls of text. Only you make it personal, while pretending to take the higher ground. I am insulted by your lack of integrity.

Am I to assume that one day you shall look upon your life and regret?

How sad.

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

If your claims aren't related to the topic at hand, that's on you.

Not being able to back them up is merely how we know that they're not true.

And your reaction to bring asked shows that you know that, at least on some level.

The truth is the higher ground. That's not a pretense, and it's not irrelevant. As we saw from Jan 6, if you can get people to believe absurdities you can get them to commit atrocities.

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's possible that someone who hasn't been following the investigations might believe that.

But you're just lying aren't you.

You know Trump is in front of the criminal courts, and he's trying to delay the cases, not fight them, because his corrupt scotus will allow him to pardon himself if he wins the presidency.

And you know that the charges against Biden are now focused on $4000 Biden payed back to his dad from a loan for a truck:https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/12/04/comer-mischaracterizes-hunter-biden-car-payment-reimbursement-his-dad/

There's literally nothing against Biden, and serious charges, with sufficient evidence that they're being brought against Trump.

But you don't care about the truth do you?

You'll repeat lies if it supports the criminals who have as much hatred for asylees and women as you do, and you're prepared to be a deceiver to hide your inability to love your neighbour amongst others who similarly fail to be decent or even average human beings.