Haha

submitted by IndianaJones from i.imgur.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

There is no scientific marker

There are MANY

No, there aren't. Show us your racial science theory, professor, because I can assure you it's not a scientific concept. So link us to some reputable science journal with your discovery that race has a biological basis.

Not ethnicity. Race. You need to show us how WHITENESS has a definition including pale finno-ugric and pale indo-europeans but excluding darker finno-ugric and darker indo-europeans. Good luck

[–]JasonCarswell 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Not ethnicity. Race.

Semantics. Define race. Or define a single race. We can of course find exceptions to whatever you define, such as Asians or Africans with blue eyes.

If you don't think they're trying to weaponize viruses aimed at certain races/ethnicities based on their genetic makeups (ie. scientific markers), then you're uninformed.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

So link us to some reputable science journal with your discovery that race has a biological basis

They wouldn't publish such a thing, race is considered an imaginary social construct like gender.

We don't have races or genders anymore, we are all equal.