Glowing or based?

submitted by AlphixNational Socialist from self.debatealtright

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]AlphixNational Socialist[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

If you read the tweet, the FED connection is pretty obvious.

[–]wristaction 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

What is it? Articulate this "FED connection" you claim was obvious to you.

[–]AlphixNational Socialist[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

If you're too dumb to see it, and not actually playing, then I won't make you smart enough to be useful by guiding the eyes above your drooling mouth towards the parts that any reasonably endowed human will go "OK, that's a controlled asset". I think you're playing dumb, because people are rarely THAT dumb, and just want me to show you how to present somebody so that they don't trigger the "controlled asset" flags.

[–]wristaction 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

So, you won't be able to articulate this claimed "FED connection" you claimed was obvious to you, is what I'm hearing you say, is that correct?

[–]AlphixNational Socialist[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Retard annoys. Retard blocked.

[–]wristaction 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Okay. Bye Ira.

[–]AlphixNational Socialist[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I have little patience for morons but I came back just for you. My munificence amazes me.