you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]JuliusCaesar225Nationalist + Socialist 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I used to get really worked up about stuff like this but I've been trying not to lately. I have learned to just accept it as punishment for the weakness of late stage liberal society, even moreso weakness of RW movements who lack any organization or revolutionary will. The democratic age and its weak spirit has completely degenerated European man. The end result may be a few points bump to the controlled RW party when what it needed is a reverse bolshevik style revolution to tear down the current order and build it anew.

[–]NeoRail 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

In the past couple of years, I don't think I've ever seen you say anything positive about white people or even any right winger. It's always just takes like this. If everyone is doing such a poor job of undermining liberalism, it should be be very easy to do better. So, where are your achievements? Don't you think you are being a bit unfair?

[–]JuliusCaesar225Nationalist + Socialist 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

My issue isn't even the lack of action taken against the current order but the lack of consciousness of the severity of situation and the radical action that must be taken. Most RW don't speak or think like this, they are weak and democratic in their mentality. Look at the way radical leftists constantly speak about revolutionary action against the system, it doesn't matter if they are retarded at least they think in such terms. Would Bolsheviks ever have achieved what they did if their propaganda wasn't constantly advocated for revolutionary action? Never before has the West been more in need of revolutionary change but because RW identifies with conservatives and engages liberal democracy they do not even talk about revolutionary action let alone take it.

And before someone mentions the way Nazis were able to have revolutionary change by engaging with the liberal democratic system, that was a different situation in a unique culture that cannot be compared to today. We are more equivalent to Bolsheviks in Tsarist Russia, they could never hope to achieve power through democratic means so the only choice was revolution.

[–]NeoRail 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You can't expect the average citizen to have a thorough political education and a character suited for politics. This will never happen, and can never happen. It has never been the case. And the same applies even for what we could call "the political vanguard". Most right wingers you see are still human beings who are just trying their best. And it should be noted that the right has faced a century of marginalisation and harsh suppression. I am impressed that right wingers today can even get anything done at all, and they are doing things despite the extraordinarily difficult circumstances. As for the comparison with leftists, the radicalism of leftists, particularly American leftists, is owed to them being psychologically unstable and often times straight up criminal individuals. They are forced to be radical because they are incapable of moderation, political or even mental or emotional. I would think that it is a good thing to differ from leftists in this regard. Not to mention that leftists have been completely ineffective in achieving any of their goals besides annoying right wingers and getting in the way of more effective and organic political forces. Electorally and on the streets, the left is a failure. They are good at being lapdogs for the liberals and little else. Look at what happened to the Sanders campaign, to the Antifa autonomous zone, to basically any leftist endeavour. It's all come to nothing, always. Are you really sure that these are the people you want to emulate?

If we are going to talk history, then let us at least be consistent - do you think that the Bolshevik revolution was not itself the result of unique, unrepeatable historical conditions? Here's a few vital preconditions without which the Bolshevik revolution would not have come to be: the events of 1905, the imperial government's response in the years following 1905, the unprecedented experience of the First World War and the February Revolution. A Bolshevik Revolution type of scenario is never going to happen in the modern West. The Bolsheviks relied especially on their hardened and well-entrenched power base in the cities of Moscow and St Petersburg. The major cities and the capitals today, on the other hand, are where the right wing movements are weakest. These are the strongholds of leftists and liberals. So, clearly, a Bolshevik-style strategy is completely impossible.