you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]oligarchracy 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

the reason I don't reply to shitlibs is risk of suspension and waste of mental energy.

But you just said the entire purpose of you spewing years of continuous concern troll posts that have gotten you periodically suspended and banned here is so we can better debate shitlibs. Now you're saying its a waste of energy and not worth the risk of suspension to debate them? Which is it?

I post those posts here in order to challenge users and to formulate counter arguments to common arguments the enemy makes.

But one sentence ago you just said it's not worth the energy and risk of suspension.

Tell me what the definition of a concern troll post is. Give us the definition.

[–]Nasser[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

I don't feel I'm the best debater, I link the reddit posts as well if anyone here wants to try to debate with the users they can.

I don't know what the definition of concern troll is, I think it is honestly you just being upset the sub isn't a circlejerk and you aren't challenged on any view (to make it clear I am a White nationalist but I'm more moderate on other issues and not a fascist).

[–]oligarchracy 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I don't feel I'm the best debater, I link the reddit posts as well if anyone here wants to try to debate with the users they can.

But you said yourself that debating them would risk a suspension(in actuality you know they would be banned), so why would you link to those posts knowing others would simply be banned?

I don't know what the definition of concern troll is

Oh I think you know exactly what concern trolling is. Everyone with a room temperature IQ who has spent any amount of time on the internet knows. It is universally bannable in any forum where you have a "team" or a side you claim to be on. This is literally the first sub I've ever been on where mods don't ban it consistently, despite it being explicitly listed as against forum rules.

Even though you know, I'll give you examples. An alt righter goes to a Jewish sub and says 'yo guys, I'm worried about the fact us Jews were heavily involved in the slave trade and people know this, so how can we counter our obvious involvement and profiting from the slave trade?'

Or another example is going to a black or BLM themed sub and saying 'how do you counter the fact that blacks kill way more whites than the reverse?' Or saying 'yo, we need to stop proving the "enemy" right by killing all these white kids like this recent example im linking to'. That is concern trolling, that is what you do, that is what you have always done, and until you are banned will continue to do, and you know this.

[–]Nasser[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Well I am a White Nationalist, I'm not a fascist though and I've never claimed to be one. I don't encourage users to interact with the reddit posts either, that is to their discretion.

Here's a question for you: Why don't you put in even an ounce of effort on adding content or questions to this sub instead of crying and bitching about users who do (and don't comply with how YOU think they should act) like a paranoid lunatic?

[–]oligarchracy 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Well I am a White Nationalist, I'm not a fascist though and I've never claimed to be one.

I'm neither a white nationalist nor a fascist, and unlike you I never claim to be either.

I don't encourage users to interact with the reddit posts either, that is to their discretion.

So why do you link to these posts over and over again for years? You said it's a waste of time to debate shitlibs, but it's apparently not a waste of time to spam concern troll posts for years on these reddit posts you admit you never have any intention of debating anyone on and would instantly get a person banned? When and where are you pretending such debates ever occur exactly? Obviously not in the place you literally link to, as you admit.

[–]Nasser[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

What ideology are you?