Is there any data on how developed America would be with only whites? What about only blacks? What about only hispanics? What about only asians and whites?

submitted by 8thmonitor from self.debatealtright

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]EuropeanAwakening14 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

It's really dishonest to not point out that that "study" doesn't take into account per capita measurements. White Americans make up a little under 60% of the American population. It's actually Black's and Hispanics that are over represented on a per capita basis.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

In 2020, hispanics and latinos contributed 2.8 trillion USD to the economy. Meanwhile in 2020 the ENTIRE US budget for social services was around 1 trillion USD. This means that hispanics and latinos could support the ENTIRE safety net for all races 3 times over. This means that it is physically impossible for hispanics and latinos to be a net drain on social services. This is a fallacy.

[–]DragonerneJesus is white 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Did they contribute 2.8 trillion USD to the federal budget?

[–]Blackbrownfreestuff 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Every time the topic of wetbacks come up, we always hear about Muh GDP. I'm not a GDP nationalist. Whites are doing just fine maintaining very high GDP around the world. The anlgosphere is wealthy. That's why wetbacks want in. If Mexicans immigrants really do raise GDP, I don't want it. It's not worth it. I don't want to send my kids to a school with a bunch of Spanish speaking Mexicans, for a slight increase in GDP.

Every time this GDP stuff comes up I'm always perplexed by it. I guess leftists view it as some sort of gotcha, checkmate. All these wetbacks raise GDP, therefore let the invasion continue?