you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]EuropeanAwakening14 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

OK. We don't need to have a "counter argument" every time a White person does something bad. This is a retarded way to view things. Anti-Whites hate Whites no matter what. Whites already have some of the lowest crime rates and commit a disproportionately low amount of hate crimes. They still attack us. The argument is that White people doing bad things doesn't mean we can't advocate for our racial interests. It's that simple. If it did, it would apply 10x to blacks.

[–]Nasser[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

My argument is the context of debate. If say you were in a debate whether on a public forum or in public about US society and race relations and trying to justify White advocacy or attacking Black/Non White victimhood narratives, the enemy could easily pull this case as a counter, swaying/manipulating the apolitical/moderate White towards their evil as well as galvanizing the left wing White.

[–]Blackbrownfreestuff 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

My argument is the context of debate.

No it isn't Salos. Youre concern trolling.

If say you were in a debate whether on a public forum

White nationalists arent allowed on public forums. We got banned, remember?

enemy could easily pull this case as a counter,

They can just make up whatever case they want, whenever, however.

galvanizing the left wing White

They're already frothing at the mouth and want everyone of us dead or in jail. They're galvanized already.