all 24 comments

[–]BISH 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (28 children)

He shot a guy in a fist fight.

[–][deleted]  (21 children)

[deleted]

    [–]BISH 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (20 children)

    Mutual combat? What? Like a gladiator?
    When does that every happen?

    What if he shot a white guy in a fist fight? You think it would be different?

    [–][deleted]  (19 children)

    [deleted]

      [–]BISH 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (18 children)

      What the black guy legally did was assault, this was not a fist fight, there was no consent gained beforehand to fight fairly.

      Fights aren't duels.

      I have been in dosens of fights, and consent was never given by me to any aggressor to fight fairly.

      If a black person pulls a gun on a white aggressor, will you then agree that the black person should have pulled out their gun?

      It's difficult to imagine you'd say that was acceptable.

      [–][deleted]  (17 children)

      [deleted]

        [–]BISH 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (15 children)

        If a White guy randomly attacked a black guy, repeatedly punching him in the face and the black guy decided to draw a gun and shoot the White guy

        Is that what happened? In reverse?

        [–][deleted]  (9 children)

        [deleted]

          [–]BISH 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

          The black guy attacked the White guy without provocation. He just got mad because the White guy stuck up for the girl he was sexually assaulting. I don't understand why you're playing dumb here.

          Some dipshit hit on a guys fiance, and then started a fight.

          Another dipshit who substituted fighting skills with a gun, pulled out the gun and shot the fight starting dipshit and killed him, right?

          1st degree manslaughter, etc.

          We can both agree on these details, right?

          Are you suggesting it's ok to kill someone who keeps approaching your fiance, etc.

          Are warning shots no longer reasonable options?

          The article is from "nationaljusticeparty.com".

          Where's the justice in manslaughter from an unarmed assault?

          Are you really this frightened of black people?

          [–]HongKongPhooey 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

          Some dipshit hit on a guys fiance, and then started a fight.

          Another dipshit who substituted fighting skills with a gun, pulled out the gun and shot the fight starting dipshit and killed him, right?

          Sounds like self defense. Is he obligated to get his ass kicked by someone breaking the law and using violence? If someone tried to physically assault me or my fiance and I was armed, I would not hesitate to shoot them. Shooting someone who is physically assaulting you is well within your rights, whether they are armed or not. I couldn't care less about the skin color of any of the people involved here

          [–]LGBTQIAIDSAnally Injected Death Sentence 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

          I have been in [dozens] of fights

          I doubt that. Why would one man have been in dozens of fights without starting at least half of them? Care to explain why you're any different from the deceased? Trying to be a bigger man by brawling more than Andrew Jackson?

          It's difficult to imagine you'd say that was acceptable.

          Nah, that's your misunderstanding of, and attempt at a 'gotcha' directed at, 'White supremacists', etc. Truth be told, we don't like degenerate Whites either: after all, if you're that aggressive, you should have been bagged long ago, and I'd have zero problem with any groid that does the service. On those rare occasions we invoke the words 'Master Race' (Shock! Horror!), you're evidently not part of it.

          Are you suggesting it's ok to kill someone who keeps approaching your fiance, etc.

          This scenario has nothing in common with the event in question. (Although I have zero problems with someone being bagged if it can be proven that he's persistently being a pest of that nature.)

          Now, I doubt that any decent, moral person has any problem with some abeed getting bagged who, after sexually harassing a woman (that alone enough of an offence for many feminists and some others to want a man put to death), proceeds to throw punches for no justifiable reason. Either the former or the latter is enough moral justification for bagging someone, let alone the both of them combined.

          More to the point, regarding your last line?

          Why are you so protective of 'black people'?

          It's because you think that criminals are the real victims; that the police are the real criminals, etc. in typical lopsided liberetardian-progressive fashion, right?

          Furthermore, your attempt to bring race into the equasion is merely another attempt to advantage you in an argument with 'White supremacists'. Him being black—while drastically increasing the chance of him being a piece of shit to anyone who isn't an egalitarian low-IQ moron who lives in a fantasy world—doesn't actually mean much here. Nobody should be free of the consequences of immoral and stupid actions, whereas you're clearly implying that we view all nonwhites as guilty and all Whites as saintly, which demonstrates your lack of understanding. You think we really value the lives of Antifa Whites or White queers and trannies, for instance? Nay, it wouldn't be an understatement to say that many of us rightly view them as worse than many nonwhites: I respect Erdogan or Assad more than some Antifa crackhead obese pansexual tranny. All that 'White supremacism' really entails here is that I consider a White Antifa crackhead obese pansexual tranny to have very marginally more value than a black one, since the latter would be even more low-IQ and otherwise incompatible with civilization than the former.

          [–][deleted] 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

          https://www.kmbc.com/article/independence-missouri-shooting-kcmo-firefighter-anthony-santi-charges/41693134 A off duty White fire fighter got into a scuffle with a black man after an argument at a gas station and the black girlfriend executed him after taking the gun from both of them. The black man tried to execute the White man with his gun and the black girlfriend finished the job and no murder charges for both blacks.

          [–]BISH 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

          Yeah. That's fucked up.

          "Execute" is a rather strong word. Usually reserved for killing a captive.

          Do you think it's unusual that a person would keep fighting with a gun trained on them?

          Do you believe everything you see in the news? I don't.

          [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

          She executed him. After her boyfriend was told to leave the gas station because he was harassing the store clerk he ran to his car to get an illegal firearm from his car. He brandished the firearm and pointed it at the White firefighter to shoot him and the firefighter grabbed him to disarm him of the gun. The girlfriend grabbed the gun and said "get off my boyfriend." A few seconds later she shot him in the back killing him. She executed him after her boyfriend lost the chance to kill him with the illegal firearm. It is a clear murder case, but thanks to the cuck white female DA, they are going to roam free to kill and rob somebody else in the future.

          [–]arainynightinskyrim 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

          https://twitter.com/KcDiscover/status/1582552334994796547

          The hatred in the comments are something else, it's impossible to not hate africans.

          [–]BISH 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

          If a black person pulls a gun on a white aggressor, will you then agree that the black person should have pulled out their gun?

          [–]Airbus320 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

          Good, go away jew

          [–]BISH 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

          Hey you pussy.

          [–]EuropeanAwakening14 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

          Hey, Jew.

          [–]Fitter_HappierWhite Nationalist[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

          So did George Zimmerman. The black guy was 6" taller and the aggressor. What would you have done? Taken a beating like a man? Let your fiancee' take a beating? If the perp had been White this would not have been a case.

          [–]Fitter_HappierWhite Nationalist[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

          Deadly force is relative to your size. This guy was much larger and very aggressive. The White guy was in no way obligated to take a chance that maybe he could out fisticuffs the rabid nog. Have you seen blacks fight? They don't follow White guy rules. They will stomp your neck first chance they get. Is THAT a "fist fight"?