a very strong in-group bias.

Indeed. But since the way they define the in-group involves nothing obviously ascriptive and immutable—in the way that our in-group is far more clearly defined; after all, a high level of European ancestry is a purely ascriptive characteristic, though there are also partly ideational components such as being of non-degenerate character—and is largely about the set of beliefs to which one subscribes, it is hard to see how they go about exercising in-group preference in practice. After all, no one has a sign on his head saying: 'I'm a Leftist; ergo, I'm on your side.' It is hard to tell whether what seems like Left-wing in-group preference is actually genuine or simply the result of many individuals understanding that they need to work together to achieve individual, rather than group, ends. In the latter scenario, they will of course cease having such an in-group preference in the event that it benefits their individual self-interest to do so.

And this leads to my second point: indeed, much of what Leftists stand for seem suspiciously like rationalizations for their flagrant and ever-growing degeneracy and parasitism. For example, 'tolerance' only ever means, in practice, tolerance of degeneracy: tolerance of fags, trannies, trans kids, &c. For I have never seen these people call for tolerance of something that was not considered, quite rightly, by the overwhelming majority of our ancestors as absolutely evil and stark raving mad. Indeed, many of them would have seen today's idiots as under something akin to demonic possession, and thus worthy only of eradication.

This is one reason for which I have always been wary of self-proclaimed socialists: the overwhelming majority of them subscribe to this ideology only because they have some kind of degenerate motivation for doing so, in particular, a destructive ressentiment, an urge to tear down everyone and everything that reminds one of one's own inferiority. And so no form of socialism that motivates its followers through appeals to such things as the fulfillment of the self-interests that a counter-productive bottom-feeder might derive from a radical implementation of equality, or the psychological comfort that one might derive from seeing those who remind him of his own inferiority destroyed, should ever be taken seriously, let alone as something even remotely capable of improving the state of the race or of Man more generally.

That is, of course, the type of socialist that permeates the comment sections of Vaush: those useless eaters who often confess to being 'neurodivergent', 'trans', 'furries' and so forth. Their brand of socialism would improve nothing: it is merely motivated by such things as the perpetual fear that the host will one day seek to expel the parasite from within himself. In this event, the Vaushists would simply die off, and even they are not stupid enough so as not to know that deep inside. They are, in that regard, smarter than their host.

Destiny, Vaush and Hasan Piker are the first three of these useless eaters that come to mind. All three combine numerous forms of degeneracy, and consequent of it, they attract others of their kind, all of whom are so twisted and far gone so as to see degeneracy as virtuous and the degenerate as brave and courageous.

As an aside, I remember you claiming that you felt worse after taking those vaccines, and not having forgotten this, I should add that I sincerely hope that you are remaining in good health.