you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]MagicMike 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

“ Racial populations differ in many genetic characteristics, some of which, such as brain size, have behavioral and psychometric correlates, particularly g. What I term the default hypothesis states that the causes of the phenotypic differences between contemporary populations of recent African and European descent arise from the same genetic and environmental factors, and in approximately the same magnitudes, that account for individual differences within each population. Thus genetic and environmental variances between groups and within groups are viewed as essentially the same for both populations. The default hypothesis is able to account for the present evidence on the mean white-black difference in g. There is no need to invoke any ad hoc hypothesis, or a Factor X, that is unique to either the black or the white population. The environmental component of the average g difference between groups is primarily attributable to a host of microenvironmental factors that have biological effects. They result from nongenetic variation in prenatal, perinatal, and neonatal conditions and specific nutritional factors.” A.R. Jensen

https://www.cogsci.ecs.soton.ac.uk/cgi/psyc/newpsy?10.023

[–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Yes, two populations live can live in diametrically opposite environments for 10,000 years and have no genetic difference in psychologically or cognitively. Evolution just cares about the skin and bone structure. Human survival could not possibly have anything to do with the brain after all.

[–]EthnocratArcheofuturist[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Secular creationists, as Greg Johnson calls them.