Sub-Saharan Africans derive up to 19% of their ancestry from an unknown, extinct hominid species not found in Eurasian populations

submitted by TheJamesRocket from self.debatealtright

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]negrogreBeing black is anti-white 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Blacks are much more likely to attack than aborigines are.

[–]douglas_waltersWhite Supremacist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Yes, they are far more threatening than Abos. But that is what makes them ideal for red-pilling and accelerationist purposes.

E.g. Australia is filled with a lot Asian immigrants. So the population have less reason to be racially-conscious.

[–]negrogreBeing black is anti-white 0 insightful - 1 fun0 insightful - 0 fun1 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Australia is filled with a lot Asian immigrants. So the population have less reason to be racially-conscious.

Why don't they have a reason to?

[–]douglas_waltersWhite Supremacist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Because Asians are not violent and low IQ. So they can culturally-integrate better than other races.

Which is what makes them all the more dangerous.