The anti white backlash towards the coverage of the Russian-Ukraine war continues to grow on social media

submitted by JuliusCaesar225Nationalist + Socialist from self.debatealtright

https://twitter.com/AlanRMacLeod/status/1497974245737050120

With the war breaking out it became a huge news story. All of social media was enthusiastically supportive of Ukraine and Ukrainians were considered victims. White people as victims. I knew that couldn't last. Anyone who knows modern progressivism and the ideology that dominates it, especially on social media, knows that they would not tolerate all this sympathy for white people for long. That conflicts with their whole ideology. Slowly but surely I have been noticed more backlash against it. It is not evolving into support for Russians but rejection to giving sympathy to Ukrainians.

There needs to be a new Godwin's Law. Godwin's Law states -

the longer an online discussion goes, the more likely a Nazi comparison becomes, and with long enough discussions, it is a certainty.

A new law should be -

whenever there is a big news story it will eventually be turned into a narrative about victimized non white groups and racist white people. The bigger the news story is the more inevitable this is.

European people should be uniting not killing each other. That is what makes this whole situation lame. You have slavs killing each other, one for Anglo American world order the other for Putin's Eurasianism when we need to be uniting for a common cause against a world that is hostile to us.

all 17 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]jet199 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

"Westerners, don't be alarmed at Muslims marching down your streets shouting death to your country and claiming allegiance to some genocidal dictator. It's completely normal for people to feel kinship with people they've never met, on the other side of the world just because they share some religion or cultural traits with them."

"Westerners, why are you caring about people you share religious and cultural traits with in a totality proportional way? That's racist!"

[–]EthnocratArcheofuturist 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Is Richard Spencer right again? Is this going to force us to become an identitarian block? Lol! Imagine...

[–]DisastrousDepth14Race comes first 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

When did Spencer say this? I'm asking because I didn't know that he said that. Also, can you please speak more about this topic. Sounds interesting

[–]EthnocratArcheofuturist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Look up Caspar's post about it.

[–]DisastrousDepth14Race comes first 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

So I've just read Spencer's tweets about this from Caspar's post. To be honest his arguments sound compelling.

[–]EthnocratArcheofuturist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Not really. The idea that the woke are going to become Nietzschean overmen is laughable. And he calls Putin's regime a regime based on resentment, but how is that any different from the West? Wokeness is all about resentment. I'm usually the most staunch defender of Spencer's takes, but this one is just too contrarian.

[–]DisastrousDepth14Race comes first 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The idea that the woke are going to become Nietzschean overmen is laughable.

I don't really care about the woke and they will certainly not become one of us but I have hope for the ordinary folks.

And he calls Putin's regime a regime based on resentment, but how is that any different from the West? Wokeness is all about resentment. I'm usually the most staunch defender of Spencer's takes, but this one is just too contrarian.

I agree

[–]shilldetector 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

You have slavs killing each other, one for Anglo American world order

Yeah that's it! The Anglos are coming to get us all, anglos included. They want to flood europe and the anglosphere with non white immigrants and incite hatred of whites and anglos because of.....reasons. Letting Jews take control of all their key institutions and media was always just an elaborate anglo plot to frame Jews for the Anglos secret plan to commit demographic suicide and destroy their societies!

[–]JuliusCaesar225Nationalist + Socialist[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Letting Jews take control of all their key institutions and media

You think this is a defensive of Anglo culture? Would you prefer the term Judeo-Anglo world order? I don't scapegoat Jews in order to give a pass to the non Jewish ruling class.

[–]shilldetector 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's not meant as a defense of anglo culture. It is meant as a diagnosis of a problem. Anglo culture might be A problem, but there is a far greater underlying problem, one which in part makes anglo culture a problem. You are addressing a symptom rather than the underlying disease. If anglos all disappeared tomorrow the problem would still exist, in fact it would probably accelerate.

[–]shilldetector 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I don't scapegoat Jews in order to give a pass to the non Jewish ruling class.

Here's the thing. They scapegoat us every day. Every time I turn on CNN, or look at reddit, or look at the wapost, NYT or literlly any mainstream media, I see white people being scapegoated either by Jews, or by proxies who collect their paycheck from Jews. Hell the fucking Jewish attorney General of the US openly scapegoats white people, and his immediate family profits by scapegoating whites, and he's far from an exception.

Black people have a saying. Dont start nothin wont be nothin. That applies here. They started the shit by slandering us continually ever since the end of ww2, going on an entire century now, and the more we say yeah you're right, we are kind of shitty, the more emboldened they get.

The JQ has a very easy solution. It doesnt require fascism, or Nazism, or war, or pogroms, or expulsion, or any other over reaction. It requires one simple thing. For whites to say no more. Enough is enough. You are not going to slander us, and when a white person calls them out for it and they attack him, we need to back them up. No more divide and conquer. You slander any of us you slander all of us, and we will do the exact same thing you've done to us. Cancel you, sue you, protest you, deplatform you, boycott you, shun you, and most of all, name you. That will solve the problem, but it requires people to stick their neck out and for others to back them up when they do. Whites are starting to do that, but when Jews attack them, through proxies or directly, they dont name them. Naming them is all it takes and they will be forced to stop this shit.

[–]EthnocratArcheofuturist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

How will you remove these parasites from power without "fascism"?

[–]shilldetector 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I'll add something to my previous comment. We're on the same side here, but you are either in denial or simply wrong about what is driving all this and why. Anglo elites today are unwitting accomplices in all this. They are concerned about one thing. Their own wealth or status. They do not coordinate with other anglo elites to push an explicitly anglo agenda. I challenge you to name anglo elites that are pushing an anglo agenda or coordinating with other anglo elites to do so. Jewish elites do push a Jewish agenda. Certainly not every single one of them, but a large and powerful contingent of them. There is no large contingent of anglo elites that are pushing an anglo agenda.

Sure Anglo elites are easy marks for Jewish pressure tactics and manipulation, precisely because they act as atomized individuals pursing their own personal goals. But the anglo question has an easy solution. Their own long term group(and ultimately self) interest. Jewish elites on the other hand see their own long term group interests as being served by undermining and destroying white societies, or at least changing them demographically so they are no longer white and whites in them no longer possess any group power and inclination or ability to act in their own group interests.

[–]JuliusCaesar225Nationalist + Socialist[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

They are concerned about one thing. Their own wealth or status. They do not coordinate with other anglo elites to push an explicitly anglo agenda.

Exactly, it is a hyper individualist merchant capitalist culture, which is why Jews were able to become so powerful and influential with zero backlash.

[–]shilldetector 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Exactly, it is a hyper individualist merchant capitalist culture, which is why Jews were able to become so powerful and influential with zero backlash.

Zero backlash? They were banned from England unbroken for over 3 centuries. That's like the mother of all backlashes. It wasnt just one leader that banned them, it was a ban that lasted down through many generations.

[–]JuliusCaesar225Nationalist + Socialist[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Dumb comment. Obviously I'm not talking about the culture of Britain 800 years ago. The Jews never faced any backlash in Britain after they were let back in despite their ascension into power and influence. Not coincidentally that coincides with Britain becoming a money based merchant culture and the rise of the individualist liberal doctrine.

[–]Blackbrownfreestuff 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Black people always have to put their privilege everywhere.