you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]88BitSorelianism 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (19 children)

Mass Shooters are disproportionately black and Muslim, but I'm sure that isn't what you wanted to talk about you just wanted to change the subject.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (18 children)

[–]88BitSorelianism 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Did you even read it?

According to most analyses and studies, the proportion of mass shooters in the United States who are white is slightly less than the proportion of white people in the general population of the US

[–]EuropeanAwakening14 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Per capita and proportionality: the bane of anti-Whites everywhere.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Again - you're picking only the bit you want for a racist narrative, albeit only a "slight" difference, and non-whites include more than 'black and Muslim'. Keep reading:

According to the Associated Press, white men comprise nearly 50 percent of all mass shooters in the US. According to the Center for Inquiry, mass shootings of family members (the most common) are usually carried out by White, middle-aged men.

Public mass shootings of persons unrelated to the shooter, and for a reason not connected with a previous crime (the rarest but most publicized) are committed by men whose racial distribution closely matches that of the nation as a whole. [eg. majority, white]

[–]88BitSorelianism 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

This is unrelated. Please leave me alone.

[–]88BitSorelianism 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Please leave me alone.

lol

[–]EuropeanAwakening14 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

Ok. Let's do the math.

https://mass-shootings.info/statistics.php?year=2021

https://mass-shootings.info/index.php

Wow, for 2021 non Whites have committed 87% of all known mass shootings. K. Math done.

[1] There are many definitions of "mass shooting" and none is universally accepted. This list was compiled based on the criteria available on :https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_mass_shootings_2020

So Don't even give us some bullshit about how you don't like how they defined mass shooting or some other weasely shit when you just linked the wiki article on mass shootings.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (10 children)

That's obviously a racist site that wants to put a black face to almost every shooting in the US, referring to almost very shooting as a mass shooting. It's obviously pushing a narrative of hate. For what purpose, you might ask. Note that the information on that site is not in agreement with the information here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_shootings_in_the_United_States

[–]EuropeanAwakening14 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

This is your playbook. As soon as you are shown to be wrong, you claim whatever evidence was presented to you is racist or was compiled by a racist. That's actually not an argument. Don't know how familiar you are with basic logic, though. Also, wikipedia is probably the most biased website in existence. It's also not made by omniscient beings and it is possible for them to be wrong. Wikipedia articles are not the end all be all of knowledge. Clearly, you can't argue against what the website says so you just ad hom and hope everyone will forget and move on.

Pathetic.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

No - I kindly told you what's wrong with the website, and offered evidence. PLEASE do not respond to me again. You are not using basic logic. It's insane. Leave me alone.

[–]EuropeanAwakening14 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

Lmao. You're getting frustrated. Hahaha. You didn't make an argument. You called it racist, linked a Wikipedia article which disproved your initial assertion, and now you want to run away.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

It's tiring to continue getting easily refutable nonsense comments, with 200% confidence and 0% accuracy. There are others on Saidit. Respond to them.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

another L for socks

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

Poor Popper - who can't bother to read the comment thread. Get back to trolling your grandmother's Facebook account.