you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 10 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 0 fun11 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I am not sure if it is necessary White pilling. Kyle Rittenhouse is not a White political dissident that beat the system. He was a random kid that got attacked by a mentally ill Jew and deranged anti-fa rioters. The lawyer in a post trial interview talked about winning the case because they found nothing on his devices linking him to "groups". The fact the lawyer saw this as a factor for winning his case shows we don't have freedom of speech or even the freedom to explore dissident ideas. He was barely able to make it out of a political show trial by being a upstanding member of the community, excellent aiming in a chaotic scenario and the clearest example of self defense in a mass media trial. There was no ambiguity for self-defense, and Kyle barely made it out of the anti-white system in one piece. Imagine in a hypothetical world where Kyle had links on his phone to amren.com or even VDare. He would probably be in prison for 425 years while also awaiting a upcoming trial in a federal court for hate crime charges.

[–]Blackbrownfreestuff 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Imagine in a hypothetical world where Kyle had links on his phone to amren.com

This. A million times this. It's a free country, so your personal thoughts on race don't suddenly nullify you're right to self defense, but if Rittenhouse had been a racist or even looked into dissident ideas, he would have been convicted and sentenced to life in prison, for the exact same self-defense scenario or any self-defense scenario.

Thoughtcrimes are literally a thing now.