Have Liberals/Leftists ever explained these photos of diversity being forced at gunpoint?

submitted by radicalcentristNational Centrism from self.debatealtright

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Salos60000Pragmatic European Nationalism 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

No they did not. When did Eisenhower or anyone on his cabinet say White's shouldn't exist? When did any US congressmen or Senator in the 1950s say Whites shouldn't exist? Show me any anti White messaging in the media in 1950s.

No sources presented for points 2 and 3. What banks did they own? Do you have any articles about these bankruptcies?

Again, this is a weak "own", the equivalent of victim blaming, if this event did end in bloodshed, absolutely no one would take the side of the grown soldiers who just killed innocent children.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

No they did not. When did Eisenhower or anyone on his cabinet say White's shouldn't exist? When did any US congressmen or Senator in the 1950s say Whites shouldn't exist? Show me any anti White messaging in the media in 1950s.

Segregation laws existed to protect Whites from getting their gene pool destroyed. Without them, America would have became exactly like Brazil, where race mixing and mass immigration turned Whites into hated minorities and the country as a whole is now a failure.

No sources presented for points 2 and 3. What banks did they own? Do you have any articles about these bankruptcies?

https://www.nytimes.com/1981/07/26/us/businesses-owned-by-blacks-still-fighting-an-uphill-battle.html

Black-owned businesses were decimated as a paradoxical side effect of desegregation, and, despite the emergence of a new generation of black businesses competing in the general marketplace, only marginal progress has been made in recovering the ground lost in this era of sweeping social and economic change. 'It Just Didn't Work Out' There are fewer than 500 black-owned businesses operating in Birmingham today as against more than 1,000 in the early 1960's, according to veteran black business leaders here, and the statistics tell similar stories in cities across the nation where blacks constitute a significant share of the population: New York, Washington, Richmond, Nashville, Jackson, Miss., Atlanta, Chicago, Kansas City, Mo.

Again, this is a weak "own", the equivalent of victim blaming, if this event did end in bloodshed, absolutely no one would take the side of the grown soldiers who just killed innocent children.

How can you be so sure? Blacklivesmatter riots were just last year, and yet there was no federal resistance to the mass looting, burnings and even murder that came as a result.

Meanwhile, the USA constantly mobilizes whenever White people get close to the U.S Capitol. Joe Biden even said the biggest threat facing America today is "White supremacy". Which is just a code word for "white people wishing to exist".

Jared Taylor did an excellent write up on how the U.S government isn't afraid to shoot down White people compared to any other race.

https://www.amren.com/videos/2021/09/does-the-us-have-political-prisoners/

If the U.S Army didn't want to gun down White people for opposing diversity, why summon them in the first? It seems like they had intentions to kill in order to push an agenda.

[–]Salos60000Pragmatic European Nationalism 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I don't really believe your point on segregation. The Black population was only 10% of the populace, and on top of that most races choose those of their own. What has done the most harm to White America over the last 50 years was mass immigration introduced by parasites and traitors. The Black community has largely remained stagnant.

The desire to end segregation wasn't motivated that much by anti whiteness(although it was used a staging point) more as a way to deprive the soviets of the talking point as the US sought allies in post colonial nations as well as that morality was a motivation as communications connected the north with the south.

Eisenhower send the troops to enforce the Supreme Court decision, no Whites were killed at Little Rock.

I'd be fine with segregation of the Black community was actually treated fairly. There are thousands of accounts for Blacks who grew up in that time period, their QOL and restrictions against them are pretty clearly documented. The business's point is a good one but the business class was likely in a minority compared to the populace in cheap labor.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

good point everything that led to progress was done to compete with the soviets. New Deal and space program too.