The jews aren't White theory doesn't really have a strong basis to be honest

submitted by Salos60000Pragmatic European Nationalism from self.debatealtright

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]literalotherkinNorm MacDonald Nationalism 12 insightful - 2 fun12 insightful - 1 fun13 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

Our people don't have origins in India you utter retard. The White people whose culture appears to have emerged in the Steppes of what's now Ukraine who spoke proto Indo-European and conquered all the way from Northern India, parts of China, Persia and all the way West to Ireland were Whites and they form a major part of especially NW European ancestry. You're honestly too fucking stupid to even debate. You just babble and say weird random shit I'd expect from a 12 year old.

Jews are Jews. I don't give a fuck if they're 'brown', 'blue', 'green' or 'white' they are their own group with their own identity, religion and interests. That's all that matters. Mostly only morons debate this utterly meaningless question whether they're White or not.

Jews are Jews. I'd be as opposed to the Amish -- who are 100 percent of European origin -- if they acted the way Jews do. It is an irrelevant piece of tedium for philo-semites like you to obsess over.

Also spare me this fake sudden conversion to any hostility to Jews. You're such a slimy fucking liar.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 5 fun1 insightful - 4 fun2 insightful - 5 fun -  (5 children)

Why so hostile?

Anyhow, seems you missed this day in school:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_Horde

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mongol_Empire

Most Europeans are mixed.

[–]literalotherkinNorm MacDonald Nationalism 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Europeans are a mix of three ancestries for the most part. Ancient hunter gatherers who have been there since before the last ice age, Anatolian Farmers who find their closest representation in modern Sardinians and the Indo-European speaking people who were the last major wave of genetic input -- mostly on the paternal line as they slaughtered the all the men and took the women. So yes we are mixed. What that means in your addled brain I don't know. I guess it means infinity Somalians and Eritreans to White countries forever somehow. For me I can't quite make that logical leap. You're welcome to it though.

Thanks for posting about the Mongol Empire though. Fascinating and totally relevant to the ancestral make up of most modern Europeans.

[–]YORAMRWWhite nationalist, eugenicist 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Also, you have to keep in mind that, although modern-day whites are technically a mix of three ancestral populations, those three ancestral populations were by no means different races. Based on the archelogical evidence, those three ancestral populations were distantly related to each other and would all fall into the Caucasoid category based on physical characteristics, and were at most different sub-races.

So modern-day whites aren't a mixed people in the way mestizos and and South Asians are for example, and comparing the "mixed" origins of whites to the actually mixed origins of mestizos and South Asians (as "socks" was likely going to do, thinking it's an "own" against us) would be like comparing people who are half German half English to people who are half German half Somalian.

[–]SoylentCapitalist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Europeans did mix with Neanderthals which were far more genetically distant to them than blacks are today.

[–]YORAMRWWhite nationalist, eugenicist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I know, but Neanderthals weren't one of those three ancestral populations. Those three (proto-)white ancestral populations emerged thousands (if not tens of thousands) of years after the Neanderthals were still around and the mixing occurred. Those three acestral populations were the Western Hunter Gatherers (Nordic whites, Northwestern Europe), Indo-Europeans/Yamnaya (partially Nordic whites, eastern Ukraine and the Caucasus), and Neolithic Farmers (non-Nordic whites; Southern Europe, North Africa and the Levant/Near East). All three of those ancestral populations of mordern-day whites already had Neanderthal admixture, just like non-white Caucasoids, Central Asians (Caucasoid-Mongoloid hybrids) and East Asians (most pure Mongoloids).

Furthermore, West-African blacks (Congoid Negroids) have admixture of up to 20% of previously unknown "ghost DNA", which has recently been revelead to have been a hybrid of Homo Sapiens and Homo Erectus (a now extinct human subspecies which is known for looking like a racist caricature of a black man, which has been found to have been very lazy and low-IQ), meaning modern day blacks are the closest thing still alive to the Homo Erectus.

[–]SoylentCapitalist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Furthermore, West-African blacks (Congoid Negroids) have admixture of up to 20% of previously unknown "ghost DNA", which has recently been revelead to have been a hybrid of Homo Sapiens and Homo Erectus (a now extinct human subspecies which is known for looking like a racist caricature of a black man, which has been found to have been very lazy and low-IQ), meaning modern day blacks are the closest thing still alive to the Homo Erectus.

I've read about this a few times on this sub. Looking up the source for this it states 2-19% which realistically means 10.5% admixture on average.