The Tonight Show audience cheering at white population decline

submitted by [deleted] from self.debatealtright

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

I've spoken with Leftists and they're hellbent on this idea that "Hispanics" are going to be counted as Whites, just like how Italians and Irish are.

But that makes little sense because the latter two groups were from continental europe and they've completely assimilated to White identity.

Hispanics not only look physically different thanks to race mixing, and it also shows in how their own societies always end up in disaster.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Not much "race mixing" when 90% of the Aztecs and their neighbours died of smallpox shortly after Cortés arrived. There is almost as much Native American in some of the descendants of North American settlers. Defining what's NOT "white" will become more difficult over time, if we consider DNA.

[–]Fitter_HappierWhite Nationalist 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Every word out of your mouth is wrong in some way, it's amazingly consistent. I defy you to show me the data that says there's ANY significant Native American in the general White population, not counting Mexicans.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Perhaps you should re-read what I wrote. (Also, the words aren't 'out of my mouth'; they're typed.)

I didn't write that there was any "ANY significant Native American [DNA] in the general White population".

I wrote:

Not much "race mixing" when 90% of the Aztecs and their neighbours died of smallpox shortly after Cortés arrived. There is almost as much Native American in some of the descendants of North American settlers. Defining what's NOT "white" will become more difficult over time, if we consider DNA.

Loses of 90% of North and Centrail American native groups to smallpox and other diseases resulted in FEWER native populations, many of whom - and their ancestors - nonetheless had children with the European populations. It's not that complicated, and you can read about it in various history texts.

[–]Fitter_HappierWhite Nationalist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Also, the words aren't 'out of my mouth'; they're typed.)

excellent point. you're a fantastic contributor to this forum.