you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

From the perspective of non-whites it's pretty obvious why we wouldn't want to call white people superior.

Human beings are animals, and superiority runs rampant in the animal kingdom. Do you call yourself a cuck because you wouldn't stand a chance against a 400 pound Gorilla in a ring? What about a bear or a lion? Accepting such superiority is ok, because it represents biological facts and in many ways, is crucial for survival.

Calling any race other than your own superior is cuckoldry.

See above, it's called facing reality and facts.

If there was another race that made the exact same achievements as White people, where are they? Answer: They don't exist.

I'm sure you'd never willingly call East Asians superior.

Why? If they can prove it, I wouldn't deny it. For example, I think East Asians are far superior at making video games. They also do far better in school than other groups. If I'm not afraid to admit those things, why would you or anyone else when the evidence exists?

[–]douglas_waltersWhite Supremacist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

You are talking past each other.

In context, we are discussing a totalising superiority as an organism, which in my view, can only be derived from objective markers of success like reproductive fitness, civilisation building, scientific achievement, intellectual and cultural developments, conquest and military might, etc.

Do I expect other races to consciously acknowledge white supremacy given this criteria? No, that would be warped.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Do I expect other races to consciously acknowledge white supremacy given this criteria? No, that would be warped.

But you haven't explained WHY that is warped, especially since:

objective markers of success like reproductive fitness, civilisation building, scientific achievement, intellectual and cultural developments, conquest and military might, etc.

Already exists. Quick question: which was superior? The Ethiopian Empire or the Roman Empire? The Romans? Ok, now guess which race they were? White? Ok, now put the two and two together and which Race did better in history?

It's incredibly straight forward, and I even explained that if there was another another race who had the exact same achievements as the Romans, the Portuguese or the British then YES! I would acknowledge it. Why the hell wouldn't I? It's impossible to lie or fake the maps that show the extent of conquest, or the technology they built, or the quality of life they enjoyed. It has nothing to do with being cucked because it's just pointing out basic facts. And if other Races deny that, they are only hurting themselves.

Look at present day South Africa. One of their former Presidents literally went on Television and said he hated seeing Blacks get educated like Whites always have. I'm not making this up, here's the source:

https://www.timeslive.co.za/news/south-africa/2020-06-15-it-kills-me-to-see-black-educated-youth-thinking-like-white-people-says-zuma/

Now look at where his country is today? Did removing "white thinking" make the country prosper, or did it get worse in hosting violence and poverty? Since violence and poverty are always bad, do we have direct comparisons to say the country is inferior to Apartheid? Yes! That's the power of facts. It will always be true, even if someone else pretends to ignore it.

[–]douglas_waltersWhite Supremacist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

haven’t explained WHY

Acknowledging that your tribe is inferior to other groups would be demoralising, leading to potentially destructive behaviours. Beyond this, it is simply unnecessary.

So I would flip the question: what benefit is there to non-whites for acknowledging white supremacy?

I would acknowledge it

An anecdotal case of autism cannot be extrapolated to the irrational masses as a whole.

Did removing “white thinking” make the country prosper... Since violence and poverty are always bad

Different races have divergent ideal modes of living. The problem with modern Africa is the presence of Chinese trade and white infrastructure in the hands of literal apes.

This unfamiliar and fundamentally unnatural way of life is going to produce stressors detrimental to harmonious existence (this looking nothing like European civilisation, but is nonetheless a consequence favourable to their predispositions).

Thus, what you define as “prosperous” or “bad” is informed by your cultural bias as a white man raised under the umbrella of liberal-capitalism that is obsessed with material wealth and standard of living.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Acknowledging that your tribe is inferior to other groups would be demoralising, leading to potentially destructive behaviours. Beyond this, it is simply unnecessary.

Ok, this is just being stupid.

Everywhere in life, there is practically no such thing as equality. It just doesn't exist, especially in the animal kingdom world where such differences reveal themselves very blatantly. If I see someone who can run faster than me, or do complex math questions, my immediate instinct should be to find it impressive, rather than live in a constant state of denial that says "No, that's impossible! Only I was suppose to the fastest".

There's also a saying, competition inspires innovation. Someone else being faster or smarter doesn't mean you can't learn to improve these things and make something better. The standards for what is considered "great" are always rising, and those who ignore it are also the first ones to fall behind in the race. The Digital world is full of many examples of this. Computers, game consoles, and smart phones all have their own manufactures competing for the spot of most powerful. The ones who succeed manage to grab the attention of billions. The ones who stagnate or fail to keep up, are now forgotten in history.

So I would flip the question: what benefit is there to non-whites for acknowledging white supremacy?

For one, the world would be a lot more peaceful. Less people deluding themselves into thinking we're all the exact same could actually inspire them to learn about genetics. We would have no more shitty riots if blacks for example, stopped falling for the lie that police always target them unprovoked or that their crime statistics doesn't raise alarms. In a lot of ways, blacks would do better if they just simply acknowledged the truth and just picked a better culture that didn't worship rap music and breaking the law. That doesn't mean there would be no more black criminals or high levels of violence, but at least there would be some level of accountability where people like George Floyd or Trayvon Martin aren't glorified as Saints and require statues built in their thuggish honor.

An anecdotal case of autism cannot be extrapolated to the irrational masses as a whole.

You know, I had someone explain to me before about the irrational masses and my response is I don't let them dictate my thinking. Democracy is proof that millions of people will always vote against their own interests, because they are either Low IQ or simply ignorant. After reading the bell curve, it should be fairly obvious that all major decisions in life where always decided by the highest caste. Mcdonalds doesn't let their fry cooks run the business, only the CEO at the very top has the power to influence millions. Similarly, I don't care if the actual lemmings disagree with me. I consider myself smarter to know what is actually good for them.

Different races have divergent ideal modes of living. The problem with modern Africa is the presence of Chinese trade and white infrastructure in the hands of literal apes. This unfamiliar and fundamentally unnatural way of life is going to produce stressors detrimental to harmonious existence (this looking nothing like European civilisation, but is nonetheless a consequence favourable to their predispositions). Thus, what you define as “prosperous” or “bad” is informed by your cultural bias as a white man raised under the umbrella of liberal-capitalism that is obsessed with material wealth and standard of living.

South Africa is proof that abandoning White excellence, or the model created by them, was a big disaster, because the absolute alternative (i.e President Zuma saying Blacks needed to think like Blacks) just doesn't work. Yet at the same time, Blacks still don't like extreme violence or poverty, because they still call the police or ask for financial assistance when they're on their last knees. I'm not saying we need to scrap every unique racial culture on Earth. I think my love of Japan is proof that a balance can exist. But I wont shed any tears if there was a worldwide eugenic effort to remove the lass savory elements found in every country. Stuff like slavery or human sacrifice, have always thrived on pure misery, rather than advance a civilization in any meaningful way. We can live without those things. But if Blacks want to make movies about themselves, or engage in physical sports, I'm not going to complain because they're neither harmful or deleterious. You can still have an advance civilization that does those things.

Edit: And the fact that non-whites have always immigrated in mass to White cultures is proof there is no bias in what I'm talking about. If they hate wealth and high standards of living, then they can always buy an Airplane ticket and GTFO. But.... they.... never.... do..... this.... ever.....

That's why I made this thread. Every human being on Earth is complicit in finding White people to be better than them. They don't ever admit this outloud, but their actions speak even louder when they demand they get access to the White Man instead of asking for a wall to separate them.