It is always weird that this line of thinking is often implied among anti-Whites. "Your ancestors were too magnanimous to completely destroy a hostile non white group, therefore you now have to give up your countries and pay tribute to these groups forever." If anything, this line of thinking makes it seem the biggest mistake of White ancestors was not completely destroying non white groups after standing victorious over them in the past. We don't hear big oppression narratives about Arabs castrating African slaves during the time of the transatlantic, Arabic and African slave trade. We only hear stories about Whites which treated slaves better than other groups that participated in that slave market.

This type of narrative justifies genocide because soft treatment of losers leads to greater resentment. They will never be grateful that they are allowed to reproduce and continue to carry on their existence. You could posit with this type of thinking that Nazi Germany was evil because they never planned or were able to kill all Jews. If they killed all Jews, the holocaust would have never happened because there would be nobody to complain about it. This type of argumentation is clearly insane, but anti-Whites often imply this with their narratives. I want to know if this is just oversight on their part or their universalist victim narratives are just part of their pilpul.