Vincent James' best video. When Critical Race Theory Leads to anti-White Violence.

submitted by [deleted] from self.debatealtright

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (23 children)

So your argument is that if you can find one white person in history that owned a slave all anti white rhetoric is justified?

I'm going to assume you accept my argument that Jews were the primary owners of american slaves since you didn't argue with my infographics.

[–]Daddiescummies 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (22 children)

So your argument is that if you can find one white person in history that owned a slave all anti white rhetoric is justified?

No, my argument is that slavery existed and produced generational wealth and comfort for White people at the expense of Black and Indigenous people

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (21 children)

Your argument doesn't work if the majority of slave owners and sellers and distributors were Jews. Your argument doesn't work in white countries that were never involved in slavery or colonialism. Your argument doesn't consider white slaves (slavic people, Barbary pirate slave trade, arab slave trade of Iberian whites). Your argument doesn't consider non white slave owners (i.e. slavery all over the world). Your argument doesn't consider modern slavery (much of it rebooted after Hilary took out Ghaddafi). Your argument doesn't consider other forms of slavery relevant to the neo feudalism we are living in.

[–]Daddiescummies 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (20 children)

Your argument doesn't work if the majority of slave owners and sellers and distributors were Jews.

They weren't.

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (17 children)

They weren't slave owners or they weren't the majority? (Or are you trying to say Jews are 'white' because in this case it helps your argument? Then in another argument you will probably say Jew's aren't white. Jews seem to love bouncing back and forth between white and not white. How convenient.)

[–]Daddiescummies 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (16 children)

Not the majority.

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (15 children)

Even a casual glance at Jewish involvement in the triangle slave trade operated out of the Netherlands disproves this.

The Dutch Jews were even involved in white slaving

https://nationalvanguard.org/2020/07/dutch-jews-and-the-white-slave-trade/

And if National vanguard is a biased source from your perspective you're welcome to dig into the excellent works of Historian Tony Martin.

https://saidit.net/s/runebooks/comments/1wp6/the_tony_martin_reader/

One thing I will give you is that Jews very strategically gave up their holding in slaves about 10 years before the American civil war. If you look at demographic data post 1850 you will probably see more anglo ownership of slaves than Jewish ownership but you can see that the reason Jews were giving up these holding is because the UK had banned slavery and they knew the American Civil war was coming (because they were instigating it). Must be nice to basically have a heads up on the directions of markets. It's almost like they still do this in the form of hedgefund plays, false flags, etc., but that's a different comment.

[–]Daddiescummies 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (14 children)

Even a casual glance at Jewish involvement in the triangle slave trade

Nobody was forcing Americans to buy slaves. The Government could have outlawed slavery at ANY POINT and chose not to, because it would have upset whites.

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (13 children)

The Government could have outlawed slavery at ANY POINT

Lol. It did outlaw slavery. Whites fought a fucking war over it. We lost 600k people. Where's the war in the arab world to end slavery? The Chinese world? The Latin world? You're essentially making the argument that whites boldly ended slavery you realize that right? I wonder why that's not in the critical theory and cultural marxist propaganda taught to children in school? Seems weird huh?

[–]Daddiescummies 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (12 children)

Slavery isn't outlawed in America.

  1. Slavery is still legal if someone is imprisoned.
  2. The US prison system is a for-profit industrial complex.
  3. Over policing, false accusations, Racist laws, and systemic marginalization/dehumanization feeds Black people (mainly men) to the prison industrial complex to provide slave labor and maintain a racial under-caste by destroying Black families and communities. The fact that Black men receive longer and harsher jail sentences than their white male peers is further proof of the systemic injustice of American prisons.
  4. Ending slavery did not end the cultural and economic exploitation of Black people.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

YES THEY WERE. This is heavily documented. Go read Elizabeth Donnan.

[–]Daddiescummies 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No, they weren't babe. White people decided to buy slaves, then used them to profit. Nobody forced whites to buy slaves or buy products made with slave labor, but they still did because it provided them with power and wealth.