you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Yin 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Birth control hormones are unnatural and nation-wrecking. They have some body-regulatory aspects, however it comes at the extreme trade-off of destabilizing women's bodies in worse ways which have major societal negative ramifications. And I don't just mean the insane evolutionary wrench that unlimited promiscuous sex brings in the break down of family and the allowance for a rise in hyper-feminist infrastructures backed by glorifying antinatalism, nor the chaos it all sows at the national security level: women are disposed to letting barbarians into the gate while the men around them are "replaced", therefore, it follows, more matriarchal influence leads to a weakened state primed for national genocide or autogenocide.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I went on an autism spree right after I saved the comment. This is a recent study, and it does appear to have an impact according to the results.

women are disposed to letting barbarians into the gate while the men around them are "replaced"

I still think this is a shit test of sorts, one requiring reasoning that I sure to shit don't understand. I think it's related to men becoming weak in the West. I honestly don't know. This probably requires levels of mass scale psychological analysis and a shit storm of other things that I'm not qualified to perform.

https://academic.oup.com/scan/article/11/5/767/1753384