you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]DragonerneJesus is white 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

I think subsaidits get to decide themselves if they want to be on s/all or not. The subs have to take themselves off s/all if they censor their opponents. If /u/send_nasty_stuff follows saidit s/all rules, then I don't see a problem with DAR being on s/all again.

It is the same for all the feminist subs on this site. If they want to be on s/all, then they also have to allow EVERYONE on the sub, but because the feminist subs want to censor those that disagree with them, then they have to be off /s/all. This is different for the debate feminist subs where they don't censor.

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist[S] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

I think subsaidits get to decide themselves if they want to be on s/all or not.

Obviously not. Someone from admin team is going in and unchecking the 'appear on s/all' option.

The subs have to take themselves off s/all if they censor their opponents.

We don't censor opponents here. Only people that break rules repeatedly and show they are debating in bad faith. We welcome 'opponents' not trolls.

It is the same for all the feminist subs on this site. If they want to be on s/all, then they also have to allow EVERYONE on the sub

We do not control who posts or who subscribes. So our sub is open to all of saidit.

but because the feminist subs want to censor those that disagree with them,

I'd support a 'debatefeminists' sub being on the s/all though. That's a sub that open for outsiders to come in and engage/discuss.

[–]DragonerneJesus is white 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

My message was an appeal to the admin that just removed the sub from s/all

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist[S] 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

I've got you. I don't think they will listen but we will see.

[–][deleted] 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They will never listen. I was appealing my first ban to Magnora and it was like he didn't even read what I wrote. His shtick is censoring political opponents by using his catch-all "pyramid of debate" to make us out to be the bad guys and not listening to any arguments. He's just as bad as Reddit admins if not worse due to his hypocritical advocacy for free speech.