A European Framework National Statute For the Promotion of Tolerance

submitted by send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist from self.debatealtright

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Jacinda 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I've often thought that, in Europe at least, something could be done with the recent UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.

Interpreted from a white nationalist perspective it has a great deal to offer. For example:

  • Recognizing the urgent need to respect and promote the inherent rights of [White Europeans] which derive from their political, economic and social structures and from their cultures, spiritual traditions, histories and philosophies, especially their rights to their lands, territories and resources,

[Snip...]

  • Welcoming the fact that [White Europeans] are organizing themselves for political, economic, social and cultural enhancement and in order to bring to an end all forms of discrimination and oppression wherever they occur,

  • Convinced that control by [White Europeans] over developments affecting them and their lands, territories and resources will enable them to maintain and strengthen their institutions, cultures and traditions, and to promote their development in accordance with their aspirations and needs [Cont...]

Since our government secretly ratified it, Maori activists are using it to great effect to push for a dual political system thus blowing any pretense of democracy (and equal rights) out of the water.

If they can use it the descendants of the 3 European founding groups (original hunter-gatherers, Anatolian farmers, and the Yamnaya horizon) can certainly benefit.

The UN can hardly claim to be anti-racist and argue that their policy is for BIPOC only.

As far as I know the only European group to claim indigeneity is Patriotic Alternative. You can read their statement here:

I don't know if any European nationalists are pushing for recognition under the treaty but they should.

Edit: Posted as separate thread.

[–]DragonerneJesus is white 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I've looked into it and they define it as colonialized people. So whites are excluded from the definition.

I have had succes pushing our views by taking the opposite position. "Danes aren't indigenous to Denmark, only inuits are". "Swedes aren't indigenous to Sweden, only Saami are". This makes even normies argue our points and then you can point to the politicians that have recognized saami and inuits as indigenous but not danes or swedes etc. Then while they are contrarian to you and not receptive of what you have to say, you claim that the politicians would NEVER recognize danes or swedes as indigenous. Forcing them, in their own minds, to having to argue the opposite point that of course the politicians would do that. But OF COURSE, they would. But they wont.
Then you proceed with "Try to make the politicians recognize danes as indigenous then", "They will never do it. Never ever do it".

I got a lot of downvotes for arguing "such stupid points", but it got even leftists to argue our point of view.

[–]Jacinda 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Good luck with arguing that white people aren't autochthonous, nearly everyone has Neanderthal DNA. It would be hilarious to hear a politician debate the point with an evolutionary scientist.

Kevin MacDonald makes much the same point in his latest book, Individualism and the Western Liberal Tradition reviewed here by Ricardo Duchesne.

Euro-Canadian:

Europeans evolved in the course of time inside Europe and have remained European through almost their entire history until mass immigration came to be promoted in the last three decades

John Derbyshire had a recent post pointing out how the current Woke governments feels like colonization.

VDare:

A lot of people have been comparing the rule of Wokesters to colonialism, America being run by people essentially foreign who think they mean well [Cont...]

He goes onto link a number of articles. Keith Woods often makes the same point.