A breathtaking dispaly of black courage and masculinity

submitted by casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter from self.debatealtright

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]literalotherkinNorm MacDonald Nationalism 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (15 children)

As usual the second the tables are turned on an aggressive black they become squealing little bitches crying for their mothers and wetting themselves.

They're such ridiculous creatures.

[–][deleted]  (14 children)

[deleted]

    [–]literalotherkinNorm MacDonald Nationalism 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (13 children)

    It's so fucking true and I think fight videos are some of the best raw HBD examples in existence. It's so unnerving to watch the way Blacks will stomp your skull even when you're unconscious and how like pack animals they fight.

    You can show a guy a million charts about IQ or other measures of human difference and they might not care but when you show a man how other groups fight that hits on a deeper level.

    Blacks fight like hyenas; Whites fight like lions.

    [–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (12 children)

    Its due to inbreeding. Arabs and negroes are very inbred and thus highly tribal. They fight and hunt like pack animals. They hunt the weakest and suddenly surround and pound on them.

    Europeans having been selected for individualism by the manorial system and Catholic law see combat as more of a one on one endeavor. A chance to prove your valor and masculinity.

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

    How do you explain the Habsburg jaw? Or Tay Sachs?

    [–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Global-prevalence-of-consanguinity-as-cited-by-Bittles-AH-Black-ML-ref-6-reproduced_fig1_264626559

    [–]literalotherkinNorm MacDonald Nationalism 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (9 children)

    That's the European aristocracy and Jews inbreeding. What on Earth made you think that claiming certain groups inbreed means that others don't?

    [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

    https://academic.oup.com/ije/article/38/6/1453/673854

    Consanguineous marriage happened in multiple European societies.

    [–]literalotherkinNorm MacDonald Nationalism 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

    No one said it didn't but even the paper you cited talks of strict laws limiting consanguinity laid down by the Church. Look up any current measure of consanguinity today -- and that means yesterday as well -- and the highest levels are in the Middle East and Africa.

    Even the British have to deal with the high levels of inbred Pakistani defects given their proclivity to marry their own cousins. This is well known and undisputed so it begs the question why someone would ask about the Habsburg jaw when another person mentions high levels of inbreeding in certain populations.

    [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

    I'm not arguing with anything else. I'm pointing out that historically there was inbreeding in European societies as well, and you skipped over the point in the study where the church could be paid off or convinced to allow the marriages. Marriage to first cousins is still legal within some parts of the US too.

    [–]literalotherkinNorm MacDonald Nationalism 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

    It existed but because of the culture it was low in relation to other societies both yesterday and right now. Marriage to first cousins may be legal in the US but it doesn't happen that often whereas in the countries in the Middle East where consanginuity is the highest it isn't just legal it's practically de rigueur as it has been for generations.

    [–]literalotherkinNorm MacDonald Nationalism 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    and you skipped over the point in the study where the church could be paid off or convinced to allow the marriages.

    Exactly and as I stated in my original post this was a habit only the wealthy and the aristocracy could afford to engage in hence things like the Habsburg jaw. Normal people couldn't afford things like that and that's why there's relatively low levels of consanguinity in European populations compared to other societies.