Good example - even if this is only one of the speeches. Mussolini and his party, and many in Germany, and some in England and the US (well, everywhere) shared the same concerns, especially in response to the Russian Revolution and the losses of WWI, the Irish revolt, and upon reading Spengler's 'Decline of the West', among many other devlopments. They had seen this as part of a cyclical development in civilizaiton, which had reached the end of one cycle. Yes, Jewish financial interests were among the causes for this failure of civilization by 1919, but the concerns were much broader than this. Ultranationalism was not necessarily THE answer, but arguably another aspect of late stage civilization. Fascism was initially more of a Nationalism movement than it was about the hatred of Jewish financial interests, though I agree with you that the latter issue was part of the problem. My main point is that fascism and Neo-fascism will not gain sufficient support, given previous forms of extremism. One would have to go after the big banks with anti-trust legislation, the fairness doctrine, the new deal and much more that developed in the early 20th century. That did not destroy the big banks, but it did make them useful. The 99% are oppressed because of money in politics, by Jews and non-Jews. The problem is with the 1%. Neofascism will focus only on one aspect of this and will be put down like the whiny snivling children that they are. Go after the 1%.