Kosher pro-whiteness

submitted by [deleted] from self.debatealtright

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]antireddit 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

If he wants to run for president it makes sense for him to do whatever it takes, then do everything he can to expose them once in office. If he did the things you want him to do he would be taken off the air that night, never to return. Thats the reality. Fox has always been neocon. It's always been Jewish propaganda/controlled opposition. It's almost as riddled with Jews as the rest of them, they just arent all concentrated at the top like the others, but rest assured Jewish controlled ad companies, politicos and lobby groups are breathing down their necks 24/7 to make sure they stay kosher while the Jews within do everything they can to steer it in the direction they want or subvert if they cant.

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

If he wants to run for president it makes sense for him to do whatever it takes, then do everything he can to expose them once in office.

Sounds like the exact same logic that Trump supporters projected onto their failed president.

. If he did the things you want him to do he would be taken off the air that night, never to return.

It's not 2012. He'd make more money and have a bigger audience on independent media. (worse case scenario he wouldn't starve).

Fox has always been neocon.

Trucker signaled he was willing to buck that trend. Obviously that didn't last though.

It's always been Jewish propaganda/controlled opposition.

Agreed; but again Tucker was certainly tiptoeing (and gaining huge audiences because of it).

[–][deleted]  (2 children)

[deleted]

    [–]antireddit 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    They might be willing to tolerate a black who has supported someone who was critical of them in the past, so long as they are sufficiently anti white as well and they are fairly sure this person wont ever do something like that again, and if they did the plug could be pulled on them on the quick, possibly using them as an example that blacks who aspire to power can be forgiven for past transgressions against Jews, but it had better not ever happen again and if it did, those who gave them power wont hesitate to take it away and make an example of them.

    [–]literalotherkinNorm MacDonald Nationalism 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    For me it's not that I need him to go full WN or anything -- he isn't one nor will he ever be one so why would he? -- it's the fact of what he focuses on. The genius of the Tucker show in the past was focusing like a laser on the hardest part of the problem and ignoring the easy outs. What is easier in American life than denouncing 'anti-Semitism' and what is harder than actually denouncing the anti-White aspect of the system? I feel like since he fired that writer for naughty things he said online the show has changed dramatically in tone and taken that very easy option nearly all the time which is why I don't watch it anymore.

    I saw another clip on Twitter of a segment of Tucker denouncing the speech Biden made about emergency relief for minorities but not Whites. That's good and should be denounced. So what does he do to follow up on the Biden speech? Well he has a lawyer on who is campaigning against a state law that excludes Whites, Native Americans and Asians. That's what's changed about the show is that he nearly unflinchingly now takes that easy route of not focusing on the common denominator in all this crap which is anti-Whiteness but focusing on a law that excludes others as well -- of course the lawyer mentioned Whites third in relation to the Oregon law and seemed to hesitate even to say Whites.

    The genius of Tucker's show which is now absent is not that he started repeating our talking points -- although he came pretty bloody close at times -- but that he didn't FOCUS ON THEIRS. That's why he made people so angry and worried them.

    [–]antireddit 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    I guess I should have watched the clip before commenting. I just did and it was pretty cringe. It's hard to stomach Tucker going on and on about muh antisemitism when all Martin did was accuse Jews of doing to blacks what Jews continuously accuse whites of doing to them.