all 7 comments

[–][deleted] 11 insightful - 2 fun11 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Yawn...typical conservative liberal, individualistic, lolbert nonsense. Sure, some of the sentiment is agreeable but most of it is crying about evil "gubermint" and "COLLECTIZUM". I don't really see any rhetoric in this letter that is different from what I would see in a PragerU video. Sure it attacks communism, but an attack on communism from such individualistic grounds is an attack on any sort of collectivism. Do you seriously believe the state should not have the right to regulate, enforce and protect what it believes in and what is important to it (not just even in the economic sense but also the social sense)?

"Duh steyt" and "gubermint" are nothing more than emergent properties of the society they exist within, specifically those with power, to protect whatever their interests are. Power is morally neutral, political power is no more a tool than a hammer and can be used as maliciously or benevolently as the beholder of it wishes. For example, she says "organic communities it forms, such as churches, must be invaded, defanged, and delegitimized to leave people at the mercy of authorities" (not that I imagine this woman is some devout believer). This is a uniquely modern and secular problem, the Church (idk which church she means, in reality they have varying degrees of influence depending on which) in America is weak because America separates church from state. In other countries (past and present), the church IS the authority.

Such sentiments are not helpful, this American liberalism needs to be abandoned if Americans want to achieve anything. American Republicanism (by this I mean the founding ideology of America) has been a failure and the current state of it has long been deviation from anything Washington or the other Founding Fathers would have wanted anyway.

[–]EthnocratArcheofuturist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The state is an existential entity.

[–]president_camacho 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The main problem isnt coming from "communists". It's coming from global capitalists. Seemed like a typical boomer take to me.

To the extent self described communists are a problem, its acting as the foot soldiers of the elite in physically attacking, harassing and baiting dissidents while being protected from the consequences by this elite. Their zealotry is largely superficial and fleeting, a symptom of naive youthful idealism and peer pressure, and most of them arent intelligent, disciplined, tough or courageous enough to be a serious problem. They are almost always pampered bored elites.

Jews have always had a soft spot for communists as they were seen as the vanquishers of their enemies the Czar and the Nazis, so they will always be an annoyance as long as Jews control all the major institutions in America, and its possible commies would be seen by the Jewish elite as a last ditch alternative should capitalism fail and nationalists threaten to gain power, so they dont mind having a dedicated cardre of dumbshits calling themselves commies on hand should they feel the need to resurrect Communism much like they created it.

[–]JuliusCaesar225Nationalist + Socialist 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I read about half and it was enough. It is nice she is not writing long letters supporting BLM but there is nothing unique in her views. It is the standard conservative perception of the issues which is framed as communism and the cure being libertine conservative values.

[–]EthnocratArcheofuturist 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It is nice she is not writing long letters supporting BLM

Very low bar.

[–]EthnocratArcheofuturist 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Muh 1776. Muh free market. Muh constitution. Yawn!

[–]Minedwe 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Typical, smoothbrained cuckservative take.

  • What WE should ALLOW people to own.
  • What WE should ALLOW people to do.
  • What WE should ALLOW people to say.
  • How WE should ALLOW people to use their property.
  • How WE should ALLOW people to conduct their businesses,
  • … and WHO should be ALLOWED,
  • … and WHERE.
  • How WE should ALLOW people to raise their children.
  • Who should be GIVEN which roles within society.
  • etc.

The Government SHOULD be deciding a lot of these things, in most cases. People should not be allowed to own things that are degenerate, immoral, etc. People should not be allowed to do things that endangers themslves, others, the collective, the nation, etc. and this applies somewhat to speech as well. People should not be able to use their property to exploit people, the nation, nature, etc. and the same for conducting business.

And yes, 100% the state should decided who is allowed and where. Faggots and other degenerates who have proven to have a sick mind and a penchant for raping kid should 100% not be allowed to have children at all, in any capacity. There is a right and a wrong way to raise children and the roles for people are mostly predetermined by gender, intelligence, and other such factors.

  • We have come to accept a militarized police.
  • We have come to accept ideological indoctrination in schools.
  • We have come to accept mass surveillance.
  • We have come to accept speech codes.
  • We have come to accept the rewriting of history to serve the interests of the ruling party.
  • We have come to accept the tarring of political dissidents as “terrorists”, “extremists”, and “White Supremacists.”
  • We have come to accept the State telling us when and where we can meet.
  • We have come to accept the State shutting down our places of worship.
  • We have come to accept the idea that parents should have no special authority over their children.
  • We have come to accept the manipulation of thought through the manipulation of language.
  • We have come to accept the radical reordering of society by government in the name of crisis.
  1. Good, when used by our people

  2. Good, when used by our people

  3. Good, when used by our people

  4. Good, when used by our people

  5. Yes, I too hate Jew lies like the "Holocuast" and the stab-in-the-back being a "myth"

  6. Yeah, but you condemn White 'Supremacists' too, you retarded cow

  7. I mean, that's always been a thing and pretty much always will be.

  8. They've been doing this for many years, but mainly to Christian churches.

  9. Cuckservatives support such liberal ideas as well.

  10. Always been a thing, always will be, and is a good thign when our guys do it

  11. Good, when it's done to our benefit

I really don't see how cuckservatives are so blind (besides the rampant diabetes, obviously) to the superiority of fascism and the disgustingness of their ideology of decay and pandering.