Why the Third Reich worship?

submitted by Lugger from self.debatealtright

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]EthnocratArcheofuturist 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

He believed that Germans would've been better off had they been converted to it instead of Christianity

Yes, but that doesn't mean he wanted Germany to become an Islamic state. He wasn't actually doing that. He was trying to bring back paganism. That was his ideal.

as well as placed the Arabs above fellow Europeans

In a spiritual sense, yes. I do to. I have more respect for a Jihadist than a Western bugman.

[–]Lugger[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Yes, but that doesn't mean he wanted Germany to become an Islamic state. He wasn't actually doing that. He was trying to bring back paganism. That was his ideal.

Hmm. Here's his another quote:

Had Charles Martel not been victorious at Poitiers — already, you see, the world had fallen into the hands of the Jews, so gutless a thing was Christianity! — then we should in all probability have been converted to Mohammedanism, that cult which glorifies heroism and which opens the seventh Heaven to the bold warrior alone. Then the Germanic races would have conquered the world. Christianity alone prevented them from doing so.

Still not convinced that the guy was a Muslim lover?

I mean, he doesn't even hide how much he adores Islam. It's all over the place.

In a spiritual sense, yes. I do to. I have more respect for a Jihadist than a Western bugman.

Why even choose between those two evils?

Both Jihadists and liberals are pathetic, just in different ways.

[–]EthnocratArcheofuturist 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Still not convinced that the guy was a Muslim lover?

I never said he wasn't. He was talking about choosing between Christianity or Islam. He wasn't talking about the other option, Nordic paganism, which is what he was actually reviving. Are you really this dense?

Why even choose between those two evils?

Ideally we wouldn't have to choose between those two, which is why I want Europeans to go back to their pagan roots, but if I had to choose I would choose Islam over liberalism, any day of the week.

By the way, what he said about Christianity preventing Germanics from conquering the world is spot-on. Just look at the US. If the US was Muslim instead of Christian they would have castrated every male black slave. The only reason why MENA countries don't have leftovers from black slave populations is because they castrated all the male slaves. The US would have no black problem today if they did the same. Christian slave morality prevented them from embracing their domination as masters. The moment you feel any sympathy for slaves and the weak is the moment you deserve to be crushed.

[–]Lugger[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I never said he wasn't. He was talking about choosing between Christianity or Islam.

Exactly.

He believed that the religion of i**d gt f****s was more suitable to Germans than Christianity.

but if I had to choose I would choose Islam over liberalism

Whatever. I'm not American, I'm a 'Eurocuck' (Dutch) and my experience — both in my country and in greater Europe — tells me that liberalism is 1000 times better than Islam.

I guess it's a matter of perspective, hehe.

If the US was Muslim instead of Christian they would have castrated every male black slave.

Yep, I know that Arabs castrated their black slaves, which is why they don't suffer from Black plague the way the U.S. does.

But are you sure that it was because of religion, not Arab's mentality?

Christian slave morality prevented

Christianity was pretty based until it got subverted by globohomo.

Don't forget about muh crusades, inquisition n sheeit whenever you want to tell about Christian inherent slave morality.

Don't forget that Islam also aims to convert as many people as possible, which means that, if it was really Whites' mentality, not religion (like I suggested), that prevented them from castrating the slaves, the Islamized America would probably end up with tens of millions of Muslim free blacks. Islam combined with Black aggressiveness would probably be a complete shitstorm.

But that's just a 'What if' guess and we'll never learn the truth.

The US would have no black problem today

I'd also argue that greed definitely played a part in a decision not to castrate the slaves.

"Why waste time and money transporting them across the atlantic when you can let them breed and create more and more slaves on their own."

[–]EthnocratArcheofuturist 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

But are you sure that it was because of religion, not Arab's mentality?

Yes.

Christianity was pretty based until it got subverted by globohomo.

No, it wasn't.

Don't forget about muh crusades, inquisition n sheeit whenever you want to tell about Christian inherent slave morality.

Last time I checked they lost on both counts. And the inquisition was mostly retarded.

[–]Nombre27 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This guy is a fucking idiot. Arab (Islamic) mentality is wholly driven by Islam and it's religious dictates. Why do you think their religion has them pray 5x a day? To keep them in line and coming back to the source of how they're supposed to live. It's like reinforcing something you want to do more in a manner suggested by Atomic Habits.